spamassassin-users mailing list archives

Site index · List index
Message view « Date » · « Thread »
Top « Date » · « Thread »
From John Hardin <>
Date Wed, 13 Jun 2018 23:39:27 GMT
On Wed, 13 Jun 2018, Matus UHLAR - fantomas wrote:

> On 12.06.18 19:37, micah anderson wrote:
>> 2.3 EMPTY_MESSAGE Message appears to have no textual parts and no
>> Subject:
>> It did not have a subject, but it did have content (although only
>> encrypted).... it also hit:
>> *  1.8 MISSING_SUBJECT Missing Subject: header
>> which makes sense, because the mail did not have one, but have you
>> looked in your Spam folder lately? All spam has a subject, pretty much
>> always.... an informal survey of my trash heap showed 4 messages out of
>> 400 did not have a Subject, and two of them were repeats.
> and what is your point?
> MISSING_SUBJECT is here because when message has no Subject:, it is highly
> probably spam.
> it's useless to count how many of spams hit the rule. there are many rules
> who hit only small percentage of spam, but all of them hit most of spam.
> what is important is:
> - how much of mails hitting MISSING_SUBJECT is spam
> - how much of mails hitting MISSING_SUBJECT is ham.
> if the percentage is very different in there two cases, the rule gets high
> positive (or negative) score.

S/O = .826

  John Hardin KA7OHZ              FALaholic #11174     pgpk -a
  key: 0xB8732E79 -- 2D8C 34F4 6411 F507 136C  AF76 D822 E6E6 B873 2E79
   As a Turkish general once remarked, the trouble with having the
   Americans as friends is that you can never be sure when they will
   turn around and stab themselves in the back.       -- Bernard Lewis
  5 days until SWMBO's Birthday

View raw message