spamassassin-users mailing list archives: January 2018

Site index · List index
Message list1 · 2 · Next »Thread · Author · Date
Re: Malformed spam email gets through.
David Jones   Re: Malformed spam email gets through. Mon, 01 Jan, 01:11
Pedro David Marco   Re: Malformed spam email gets through. Mon, 01 Jan, 08:12
Rupert Gallagher   Re: Malformed spam email gets through. Mon, 01 Jan, 08:54
David Jones     Re: Malformed spam email gets through. Mon, 01 Jan, 14:59
Bill Cole       Re: Malformed spam email gets through. Mon, 01 Jan, 15:29
David Jones         Re: Malformed spam email gets through. Mon, 01 Jan, 15:33
David Jones           Re: Malformed spam email gets through. Mon, 01 Jan, 16:17
Bill Cole           Re: Malformed spam email gets through. Mon, 01 Jan, 16:52
Matus UHLAR - fantomas         Re: Malformed spam email gets through. Mon, 01 Jan, 16:41
@lbutlr           Re: Malformed spam email gets through. Mon, 01 Jan, 17:02
Bill Cole           Re: Malformed spam email gets through. Mon, 01 Jan, 17:17
Matus UHLAR - fantomas             Re: Malformed spam email gets through. Mon, 01 Jan, 17:47
Bill Cole               Re: Malformed spam email gets through. Tue, 02 Jan, 02:10
@lbutlr               Re: Malformed spam email gets through. Tue, 02 Jan, 20:44
Matus UHLAR - fantomas                 Re: Malformed spam email gets through. Wed, 03 Jan, 11:57
@lbutlr                   Re: Malformed spam email gets through. Wed, 03 Jan, 20:42
Bill Cole                     Re: Malformed spam email gets through. Thu, 04 Jan, 18:47
@lbutlr                       Re: Malformed spam email gets through. Fri, 05 Jan, 02:13
Bill Cole                         Re: Malformed spam email gets through. Fri, 05 Jan, 06:53
Alan Hodgson         Re: Malformed spam email gets through. Mon, 01 Jan, 19:30
David Jones           Re: Malformed spam email gets through. Mon, 01 Jan, 20:01
Matus UHLAR - fantomas             Re: Malformed spam email gets through. Mon, 01 Jan, 20:08
Bill Cole           Re: Malformed spam email gets through. Tue, 02 Jan, 03:12
Benny Pedersen       Re: Malformed spam email gets through. Mon, 01 Jan, 17:40
Rupert Gallagher       Re: Malformed spam email gets through. Tue, 02 Jan, 08:48
Bill Cole     Re: Malformed spam email gets through. Mon, 01 Jan, 16:17
Rupert Gallagher       Re: Malformed spam email gets through. Tue, 02 Jan, 08:54
Rupert Gallagher         Re: Malformed spam email gets through. Tue, 02 Jan, 10:12
Rupert Gallagher           Re: Malformed spam email gets through. Tue, 02 Jan, 11:04
Antony Stone           Re: Malformed spam email gets through. Tue, 02 Jan, 11:12
Rupert Gallagher             Re: Malformed spam email gets through. Tue, 02 Jan, 11:26
@lbutlr               Re: Malformed spam email gets through. Tue, 02 Jan, 22:41
Alex                 Re: Malformed spam email gets through. Wed, 03 Jan, 01:39
Antony Stone                   Re: Malformed spam email gets through. Wed, 03 Jan, 09:31
Bill Cole                   Re: Malformed spam email gets through. Wed, 03 Jan, 19:36
Ian Zimmerman                     Re: Malformed spam email gets through. Wed, 03 Jan, 19:53
Bill Cole           Re: Malformed spam email gets through. Tue, 02 Jan, 19:36
@lbutlr           Re: Malformed spam email gets through. Tue, 02 Jan, 20:46
David Jones Question about BAYES_999 Tue, 02 Jan, 00:18
David Jones   Re: Question about BAYES_999 Tue, 02 Jan, 00:52
David Jones     Re: Question about BAYES_999 Tue, 02 Jan, 00:59
David Jones       Re: Question about BAYES_999 Tue, 02 Jan, 03:28
RW     Re: Question about BAYES_999 Tue, 02 Jan, 13:57
David Jones       Re: Question about BAYES_999 Tue, 02 Jan, 14:17
@lbutlr         Re: Question about BAYES_999 Tue, 02 Jan, 22:39
Matus UHLAR - fantomas           Re: Question about BAYES_999 Thu, 04 Jan, 10:46
David Jones             Re: Question about BAYES_999 Thu, 04 Jan, 14:02
RW               Re: Question about BAYES_999 Thu, 04 Jan, 16:04
David Jones                 Re: Question about BAYES_999 Thu, 04 Jan, 16:40
Alex                   Re: Question about BAYES_999 Thu, 04 Jan, 16:58
David Jones                     Re: Question about BAYES_999 Thu, 04 Jan, 17:08
Alex                       Re: Question about BAYES_999 Thu, 04 Jan, 17:31
RW                   Re: Question about BAYES_999 Thu, 04 Jan, 17:20
David Jones                     Re: Question about BAYES_999 Thu, 04 Jan, 17:31
SURBL false positives ratio
Pedro David Marco   SURBL false positives ratio Thu, 04 Jan, 20:12
David Jones     Re: SURBL false positives ratio Thu, 04 Jan, 20:22
dns-blocklist aren't used but should be
Jan Klein   dns-blocklist aren't used but should be Sun, 07 Jan, 15:26
Tom Hendrikx     Re: dns-blocklist aren't used but should be Sun, 07 Jan, 19:37
Tobi     AW: dns-blocklist aren't used but should be Sun, 07 Jan, 19:44
Jan Klein       Re: dns-blocklist aren't used but should be Tue, 09 Jan, 15:15
Joseph Brennan FSL_MIME_NO_TEXT and MIME_NO_TEXT Tue, 09 Jan, 15:56
Kris Deugau   Re: FSL_MIME_NO_TEXT and MIME_NO_TEXT Tue, 09 Jan, 18:16
John Hardin     Re: FSL_MIME_NO_TEXT and MIME_NO_TEXT Tue, 09 Jan, 18:24
RW   Re: FSL_MIME_NO_TEXT and MIME_NO_TEXT Tue, 09 Jan, 18:34
Matus UHLAR - fantomas   Re: FSL_MIME_NO_TEXT and MIME_NO_TEXT Tue, 09 Jan, 18:43
Matus UHLAR - fantomas     Re: FSL_MIME_NO_TEXT and MIME_NO_TEXT Tue, 09 Jan, 18:47
Bill Cole       Re: FSL_MIME_NO_TEXT and MIME_NO_TEXT Tue, 09 Jan, 20:34
Kacper Guzik srs with spamassassin SPF check Wed, 10 Jan, 10:45
David Jones   Re: srs with spamassassin SPF check Wed, 10 Jan, 12:38
Benny Pedersen   Re: srs with spamassassin SPF check Wed, 10 Jan, 13:36
Benny Pedersen     Re: srs with spamassassin SPF check Wed, 10 Jan, 13:49
Kacper Guzik       Re: srs with spamassassin SPF check Wed, 10 Jan, 13:57
Benny Pedersen         Re: srs with spamassassin SPF check Wed, 10 Jan, 14:36
David Jones         Re: srs with spamassassin SPF check Wed, 10 Jan, 14:37
Benny Pedersen           Re: srs with spamassassin SPF check Wed, 10 Jan, 14:45
Matus UHLAR - fantomas   Re: srs with spamassassin SPF check Wed, 10 Jan, 13:42
Kacper Guzik SPF Wed, 10 Jan, 11:14
Kacper Guzik [No Subject] Wed, 10 Jan, 11:15
Kacper Guzik test Wed, 10 Jan, 11:16
Kacper Guzik postsrs and SPF check problem Wed, 10 Jan, 11:18
Fwd: [Bug 7331] channel: SHA1 verification failed, channel failed
Kevin A. McGrail   Fwd: [Bug 7331] channel: SHA1 verification failed, channel failed Wed, 10 Jan, 14:09
David Jones     Re: Fwd: [Bug 7331] channel: SHA1 verification failed, channel failed Wed, 10 Jan, 14:47
Martin Gregorie     Re: Fwd: [Bug 7331] channel: SHA1 verification failed, channel failed Wed, 10 Jan, 15:10
Larry Rosenman       Re: Fwd: [Bug 7331] channel: SHA1 verification failed, channel failed Wed, 10 Jan, 15:19
RW       Re: [Bug 7331] channel: SHA1 verification failed, channel failed Wed, 10 Jan, 15:23
David Jones         Re: [Bug 7331] channel: SHA1 verification failed, channel failed Wed, 10 Jan, 16:08
David Jones           Re: [Bug 7331] channel: SHA1 verification failed, channel failed Wed, 10 Jan, 16:23
Alex             Re: [Bug 7331] channel: SHA1 verification failed, channel failed Wed, 10 Jan, 16:58
Kevin A. McGrail             Re: [Bug 7331] channel: SHA1 verification failed, channel failed Wed, 10 Jan, 17:21
Alex               Re: [Bug 7331] channel: SHA1 verification failed, channel failed Wed, 10 Jan, 18:40
David Jones                 Re: [Bug 7331] channel: SHA1 verification failed, channel failed Wed, 10 Jan, 20:06
Alex                   Re: [Bug 7331] channel: SHA1 verification failed, channel failed Thu, 11 Jan, 14:16
RW                   Re: [Bug 7331] channel: SHA1 verification failed, channel failed Thu, 11 Jan, 15:02
David Jones                     Re: [Bug 7331] channel: SHA1 verification failed, channel failed Thu, 11 Jan, 15:46
Kevin A. McGrail                       Re: [Bug 7331] channel: SHA1 verification failed, channel failed Thu, 11 Jan, 17:24
David Jones                         Re: [Bug 7331] channel: SHA1 verification failed, channel failed Thu, 11 Jan, 17:57
Kevin A. McGrail                           Re: [Bug 7331] channel: SHA1 verification failed, channel failed Thu, 11 Jan, 17:58
Bill Cole                             Re: [Bug 7331] channel: SHA1 verification failed, channel failed Thu, 11 Jan, 22:20
Kevin A. McGrail                               Re: [Bug 7331] channel: SHA1 verification failed, channel failed Thu, 11 Jan, 22:33
RW                       Re: [Bug 7331] channel: SHA1 verification failed, channel failed Thu, 11 Jan, 22:15
David Jones                         Re: [Bug 7331] channel: SHA1 verification failed, channel failed Thu, 11 Jan, 22:31
Martin Gregorie                         Re: [Bug 7331] channel: SHA1 verification failed, channel failed Thu, 11 Jan, 22:59
Martin Gregorie         Re: [Bug 7331] channel: SHA1 verification failed, channel failed Wed, 10 Jan, 17:18
Alex Woick     Re: Fwd: [Bug 7331] channel: SHA1 verification failed, channel failed Wed, 10 Jan, 16:06
Matthew Broadhead moving spam to junk folder Sat, 13 Jan, 08:35
Antony Stone   Re: moving spam to junk folder Sat, 13 Jan, 09:51
Matthew Broadhead     Re: moving spam to junk folder Mon, 15 Jan, 17:37
David Jones       Re: moving spam to junk folder Mon, 15 Jan, 18:50
Matus UHLAR - fantomas       Re: moving spam to junk folder Tue, 16 Jan, 08:48
Matus UHLAR - fantomas   Re: moving spam to junk folder Sat, 13 Jan, 17:42
jdow     Re: moving spam to junk folder Sat, 13 Jan, 22:30
Alex Using fuzzy patterns Sun, 14 Jan, 01:28
Rupert Gallagher   Re: Using fuzzy patterns Sun, 14 Jan, 07:45
David Jones     Re: Using fuzzy patterns Sun, 14 Jan, 12:58
Alex       Re: Using fuzzy patterns Sun, 14 Jan, 16:15
sha...@shanew.net   Re: Using fuzzy patterns Wed, 17 Jan, 17:10
Chris skipping nameserver '0.ns.spamhaus.org' because it is a CNAME Sun, 14 Jan, 15:07
Martin Gregorie   Re: skipping nameserver '0.ns.spamhaus.org' because it is a CNAME Sun, 14 Jan, 16:06
Per Jessen   Re: skipping nameserver '0.ns.spamhaus.org' because it is a CNAME Sun, 14 Jan, 16:07
Ian Zimmerman     Re: skipping nameserver '0.ns.spamhaus.org' because it is a CNAME Sun, 14 Jan, 17:20
Bill Cole     Re: skipping nameserver '0.ns.spamhaus.org' because it is a CNAME Sun, 14 Jan, 17:44
Alex Lasoriti   Re: skipping nameserver '0.ns.spamhaus.org' because it is a CNAME Sun, 14 Jan, 19:30
Kevin A. McGrail     Re: skipping nameserver '0.ns.spamhaus.org' because it is a CNAME Sun, 14 Jan, 20:05
Chris     Re: skipping nameserver '0.ns.spamhaus.org' because it is a CNAME Sun, 14 Jan, 21:20
Ian Zimmerman     Re: skipping nameserver '0.ns.spamhaus.org' because it is a CNAME Sun, 14 Jan, 22:53
Stephan Seitz     Re: skipping nameserver '0.ns.spamhaus.org' because it is a CNAME Mon, 15 Jan, 13:34
Re: Spamassassin DNS problems
Sebastian Arcus   Re: Spamassassin DNS problems Mon, 15 Jan, 14:03
Matthew Broadhead gpg validation failed Tue, 16 Jan, 09:34
Kevin A. McGrail   Re: gpg validation failed Tue, 16 Jan, 12:22
David Jones   Re: gpg validation failed Tue, 16 Jan, 13:41
FORGED_HOTMAIL_RCVD2 false positive
Pedro David Marco   FORGED_HOTMAIL_RCVD2 false positive Wed, 17 Jan, 06:14
Giovanni Bechis     Re: FORGED_HOTMAIL_RCVD2 false positive Wed, 17 Jan, 17:59
David Jones       Re: FORGED_HOTMAIL_RCVD2 false positive Wed, 17 Jan, 18:29
Giovanni Bechis         Re: FORGED_HOTMAIL_RCVD2 false positive Wed, 17 Jan, 19:08
Alex     Re: FORGED_HOTMAIL_RCVD2 false positive Mon, 29 Jan, 05:00
Giovanni Bechis       Re: FORGED_HOTMAIL_RCVD2 false positive Mon, 29 Jan, 07:26
Pedro David Marco         Re: FORGED_HOTMAIL_RCVD2 false positive Tue, 30 Jan, 02:55
Marcin Mirosław         Re: (was: FORGED_HOTMAIL_RCVD2 false positive) Can't locate object method "check_for_forged_gmail_received_headers" via package "Mail::SpamAssassin::PerMsgStatus" at (eval 1360) line 1587. Tue, 30 Jan, 09:11
Giovanni Bechis           Re: (was: FORGED_HOTMAIL_RCVD2 false positive) Can't locate object method "check_for_forged_gmail_received_headers" via package "Mail::SpamAssassin::PerMsgStatus" at (eval 1360) line 1587. Tue, 30 Jan, 09:54
Kevin A. McGrail           Re: (was: FORGED_HOTMAIL_RCVD2 false positive) Can't locate object method "check_for_forged_gmail_received_headers" via package "Mail::SpamAssassin::PerMsgStatus" at (eval 1360) line 1587. Tue, 30 Jan, 13:51
David Jones From name containing a spoofed email address Wed, 17 Jan, 19:31
Kevin A. McGrail   Re: From name containing a spoofed email address Wed, 17 Jan, 19:44
sha...@shanew.net   Re: From name containing a spoofed email address Wed, 17 Jan, 19:48
Alan Hodgson   Re: From name containing a spoofed email address Wed, 17 Jan, 19:48
sha...@shanew.net   Re: From name containing a spoofed email address Wed, 17 Jan, 21:32
RW     Re: From name containing a spoofed email address Thu, 18 Jan, 00:28
sha...@shanew.net       Re: From name containing a spoofed email address Thu, 18 Jan, 17:37
Pedro David Marco   Re: From name containing a spoofed email address Thu, 18 Jan, 11:52
RW     Re: From name containing a spoofed email address Thu, 18 Jan, 13:33
Pedro David Marco       Re: From name containing a spoofed email address Fri, 19 Jan, 05:02
Jeffs Chips         Re: From name containing a spoofed email address Fri, 19 Jan, 19:55
AJ Weber           Re: From name containing a spoofed email address Fri, 19 Jan, 19:57
John Hardin             Re: From name containing a spoofed email address Fri, 19 Jan, 20:11
Jeffs Chips               Re: From name containing a spoofed email address Fri, 19 Jan, 20:12
Jeffs Chips                 Re: From name containing a spoofed email address Fri, 19 Jan, 20:21
David Jones                   Re: From name containing a spoofed email address Fri, 19 Jan, 20:59
Chip                     Re: From name containing a spoofed email address Fri, 19 Jan, 21:17
David Jones                       Re: From name containing a spoofed email address Fri, 19 Jan, 22:24
Bill Cole                       Re: From name containing a spoofed email address Sat, 20 Jan, 06:02
Rupert Gallagher   Re: From name containing a spoofed email address Fri, 19 Jan, 06:40
Antony Stone     Re: From name containing a spoofed email address Fri, 19 Jan, 09:44
Rupert Gallagher       Re: From name containing a spoofed email address Fri, 19 Jan, 14:29
Rupert Gallagher     Re: From name containing a spoofed email address Fri, 19 Jan, 15:20
Bill Cole       Re: From name containing a spoofed email address Sat, 20 Jan, 03:51
sha...@shanew.net   Re: From name containing a spoofed email address Fri, 19 Jan, 16:10
Paul Stead     Re: From name containing a spoofed email address Fri, 19 Jan, 18:16
Paul Stead       Re: From name containing a spoofed email address Mon, 22 Jan, 16:21
Alex         Re: From name containing a spoofed email address Mon, 22 Jan, 19:18
Paul Stead           Re: From name containing a spoofed email address Mon, 22 Jan, 21:06
Alex             Re: From name containing a spoofed email address Mon, 22 Jan, 21:32
Paul Stead               Re: From name containing a spoofed email address Mon, 22 Jan, 21:40
jdow     Re: From name containing a spoofed email address Sat, 20 Jan, 01:02
Bill Cole       Re: From name containing a spoofed email address Sat, 20 Jan, 05:33
Dianne Skoll         Danger of using your real name (was Re: From name containing a spoofed email address) Sat, 20 Jan, 17:24
Rupert Gallagher   Re: From name containing a spoofed email address Mon, 22 Jan, 15:05
Rupert Gallagher     Re: From name containing a spoofed email address Mon, 22 Jan, 15:09
Jeffs Chips     Re: From name containing a spoofed email address Mon, 22 Jan, 15:11
David Jones     Re: From name containing a spoofed email address Mon, 22 Jan, 15:20
Chip       Re: From name containing a spoofed email address Mon, 22 Jan, 21:48
sha...@shanew.net         Re: From name containing a spoofed email address Mon, 22 Jan, 22:30
Chip           Re: From name containing a spoofed email address Mon, 22 Jan, 22:44
RW             Re: From name containing a spoofed email address Mon, 22 Jan, 22:56
Chip               Re: From name containing a spoofed email address Mon, 22 Jan, 23:03
John Hardin                 Re: From name containing a spoofed email address Mon, 22 Jan, 23:13
Chip                   Re: From name containing a spoofed email address Mon, 22 Jan, 23:18
John Hardin                     Re: From name containing a spoofed email address Mon, 22 Jan, 23:28
sha...@shanew.net                 Re: From name containing a spoofed email address Mon, 22 Jan, 23:16
Chip                   Re: From name containing a spoofed email address Mon, 22 Jan, 23:21
Chip                     Re: From name containing a spoofed email address Mon, 22 Jan, 23:26
John Hardin                       Re: From name containing a spoofed email address Mon, 22 Jan, 23:32
Chip                         Re: From name containing a spoofed email address Mon, 22 Jan, 23:35
Chip                         Re: From name containing a spoofed email address Mon, 22 Jan, 23:45
RW                   Re: From name containing a spoofed email address Mon, 22 Jan, 23:54
RW     Re: From name containing a spoofed email address Tue, 23 Jan, 00:09
Alex     Re: From name containing a spoofed email address Tue, 23 Jan, 00:40
David Jones       Re: From name containing a spoofed email address Tue, 23 Jan, 14:09
sha...@shanew.net       Re: From name containing a spoofed email address Tue, 23 Jan, 17:12
Chris     Re: From name containing a spoofed email address Fri, 26 Jan, 22:09
sha...@shanew.net       Re: From name containing a spoofed email address Fri, 26 Jan, 22:26
Chris         Re: From name containing a spoofed email address Fri, 26 Jan, 22:50
Andy Howell Mail flagged as spam on command line getting passed through as ham Thu, 18 Jan, 19:52
sha...@shanew.net   Re: Mail flagged as spam on command line getting passed through as ham Thu, 18 Jan, 20:24
Andy Howell     Re: Mail flagged as spam on command line getting passed through as ham Thu, 18 Jan, 21:28
Bill Cole   Re: Mail flagged as spam on command line getting passed through as ham Fri, 19 Jan, 14:21
@lbutlr   Re: Mail flagged as spam on command line getting passed through as ham Sat, 20 Jan, 22:18
Chip Turn OFF SA spam filtering but keep ON header examination Thu, 18 Jan, 20:09
David Jones   Re: Turn OFF SA spam filtering but keep ON header examination Thu, 18 Jan, 20:29
Chip     Re: Turn OFF SA spam filtering but keep ON header examination Thu, 18 Jan, 20:33
David Jones       Re: Turn OFF SA spam filtering but keep ON header examination Thu, 18 Jan, 20:48
sha...@shanew.net   Re: Turn OFF SA spam filtering but keep ON header examination Thu, 18 Jan, 20:51
Chip     Re: Turn OFF SA spam filtering but keep ON header examination Thu, 18 Jan, 21:01
David Jones       Re: Turn OFF SA spam filtering but keep ON header examination Thu, 18 Jan, 21:08
Chip         Re: Turn OFF SA spam filtering but keep ON header examination Thu, 18 Jan, 21:31
Chip         Re: Turn OFF SA spam filtering but keep ON header examination Thu, 18 Jan, 22:00
David Jones           Re: Turn OFF SA spam filtering but keep ON header examination Thu, 18 Jan, 22:11
Chip             Re: Turn OFF SA spam filtering but keep ON header examination Thu, 18 Jan, 22:17
Chip               Re: Turn OFF SA spam filtering but keep ON header examination Thu, 18 Jan, 22:31
Chip           Re: Turn OFF SA spam filtering but keep ON header examination Thu, 18 Jan, 22:13
Dianne Skoll       Re: Turn OFF SA spam filtering but keep ON header examination Fri, 19 Jan, 15:05
Chip         Re: Turn OFF SA spam filtering but keep ON header examination Fri, 19 Jan, 15:13
Noel   Re: Turn OFF SA spam filtering but keep ON header examination Thu, 18 Jan, 22:34
Chip     Re: Turn OFF SA spam filtering but keep ON header examination Thu, 18 Jan, 22:43
Larry Rosenman       Re: Turn OFF SA spam filtering but keep ON header examination Thu, 18 Jan, 22:55
Chip         Re: Turn OFF SA spam filtering but keep ON header examination Thu, 18 Jan, 23:20
Alex Woick       Re: Turn OFF SA spam filtering but keep ON header examination Thu, 18 Jan, 23:24
Chip         Re: Turn OFF SA spam filtering but keep ON header examination Thu, 18 Jan, 23:49
Alan Hodgson           Re: Turn OFF SA spam filtering but keep ON header examination Fri, 19 Jan, 00:31
Chip             Re: Turn OFF SA spam filtering but keep ON header examination Fri, 19 Jan, 00:34
Alex Woick           Re: Turn OFF SA spam filtering but keep ON header examination Fri, 19 Jan, 11:03
David Jones           Re: Turn OFF SA spam filtering but keep ON header examination Fri, 19 Jan, 13:38
Chip             Re: Turn OFF SA spam filtering but keep ON header examination Fri, 19 Jan, 14:24
David Jones               Re: Turn OFF SA spam filtering but keep ON header examination Fri, 19 Jan, 14:35
Chip                 Re: Turn OFF SA spam filtering but keep ON header examination Fri, 19 Jan, 14:41
RW           Re: Turn OFF SA spam filtering but keep ON header examination Fri, 19 Jan, 14:07
David Jones             Re: Turn OFF SA spam filtering but keep ON header examination Fri, 19 Jan, 14:21
Chip             Re: Turn OFF SA spam filtering but keep ON header examination Fri, 19 Jan, 14:30
David Jones               Re: Turn OFF SA spam filtering but keep ON header examination Fri, 19 Jan, 14:43
Chip                 Re: Turn OFF SA spam filtering but keep ON header examination Fri, 19 Jan, 14:57
Heiler Bemerguy Autolearn says it learned but dump magic stays at zero Fri, 19 Jan, 14:12
David Jones   Re: Autolearn says it learned but dump magic stays at zero Fri, 19 Jan, 14:27
Heiler Bemerguy     Re: Autolearn says it learned but dump magic stays at zero Fri, 19 Jan, 14:56
David Jones       Re: Autolearn says it learned but dump magic stays at zero Fri, 19 Jan, 15:02
RW   Re: Autolearn says it learned but dump magic stays at zero Fri, 19 Jan, 14:27
Bill Cole   Re: Autolearn says it learned but dump magic stays at zero Fri, 19 Jan, 14:33
Heiler Bemerguy     Re: Autolearn says it learned but dump magic stays at zero Fri, 19 Jan, 15:01
Fwd: New rule --- From:name domain mismatches From:addr domain
Rupert Gallagher   Fwd: New rule --- From:name domain mismatches From:addr domain Fri, 19 Jan, 15:14
Rupert Gallagher     Re: New rule --- From:name domain mismatches From:addr domain Fri, 19 Jan, 15:18
Rupert Gallagher       Re: New rule --- From:name domain mismatches From:addr domain Fri, 19 Jan, 15:24
Robert Boyl catching a dot in the number of a rule Fri, 19 Jan, 15:31
David Jones   Re: catching a dot in the number of a rule Fri, 19 Jan, 15:56
Sidney Markowitz Apache SpamAssassin Looking for Student Developers and Project ,Ideas for Google Summer of Code 2018 Fri, 19 Jan, 20:22
Maxium URL acceptable length
Pedro David Marco   Maxium URL acceptable length Tue, 23 Jan, 08:11
Antony Stone     Re: Maxium URL acceptable length Tue, 23 Jan, 09:41
Pedro David Marco       Re: Maxium URL acceptable length Tue, 23 Jan, 16:55
Bill Cole         Re: Maxium URL acceptable length Tue, 23 Jan, 22:26
Zulma Pape Using Cloud AutoML as an AI for an Anti-spam filter ? Tue, 23 Jan, 10:55
Benny Pedersen   Re: Using Cloud AutoML as an AI for an Anti-spam filter ? Tue, 23 Jan, 12:10
Kevin A. McGrail   Re: Using Cloud AutoML as an AI for an Anti-spam filter ? Tue, 23 Jan, 12:43
Martin Gregorie   Re: Using Cloud AutoML as an AI for an Anti-spam filter ? Tue, 23 Jan, 13:01
Dave Warren   Re: Using Cloud AutoML as an AI for an Anti-spam filter ? Tue, 23 Jan, 18:30
John Hardin     Re: Using Cloud AutoML as an AI for an Anti-spam filter ? Tue, 23 Jan, 18:42
David Jones Receiving a lot of junk from Office 356 Tue, 23 Jan, 15:17
Kris Deugau   Re: Receiving a lot of junk from Office 356 Tue, 23 Jan, 16:34
Pedro David Marco     Re: Receiving a lot of junk from Office 356 Tue, 23 Jan, 16:46
Vincent Fox   Re: Receiving a lot of junk from Office 356 Tue, 23 Jan, 16:58
Alex   Re: Receiving a lot of junk from Office 356 Tue, 23 Jan, 18:36
David Jones     Re: Receiving a lot of junk from Office 356 Tue, 23 Jan, 19:52
Michael Grant Sometimes (rarely) spamass-milter does not add the x-spam-* headers Tue, 23 Jan, 21:20
David Jones Pretty good spoof of AmEx Tue, 23 Jan, 21:52
John Hardin   Re: Pretty good spoof of AmEx Tue, 23 Jan, 23:56
Alex   Re: Pretty good spoof of AmEx Wed, 24 Jan, 01:11
David Jones     Re: Pretty good spoof of AmEx Wed, 24 Jan, 02:26
Tobi       Re: Pretty good spoof of AmEx Wed, 24 Jan, 07:46
Bill Cole       Re: Pretty good spoof of AmEx Wed, 24 Jan, 21:32
Rupert Gallagher   Re: Pretty good spoof of AmEx Wed, 24 Jan, 08:07
RW     Re: Pretty good spoof of AmEx Thu, 25 Jan, 01:05
RW       Re: Pretty good spoof of AmEx Thu, 25 Jan, 01:07
Rupert Gallagher kam corpus Wed, 24 Jan, 11:08
Kevin A. McGrail   Re: kam corpus Wed, 24 Jan, 12:34
Rupert Gallagher     Re: kam corpus Wed, 24 Jan, 19:20
@lbutlr   Re: kam corpus Wed, 24 Jan, 23:48
Kevin A. McGrail     Re: kam corpus Thu, 25 Jan, 12:24
David Jones Penalty for no/bad SPF Wed, 24 Jan, 14:12
Giovanni Bechis   Re: Penalty for no/bad SPF Wed, 24 Jan, 18:59
Vincent Fox   Re: Penalty for no/bad SPF Wed, 24 Jan, 19:01
Dianne Skoll     Re: Penalty for no/bad SPF Wed, 24 Jan, 19:30
Martin Gregorie     Re: Penalty for no/bad SPF Wed, 24 Jan, 19:32
Vincent Fox       Re: Penalty for no/bad SPF Wed, 24 Jan, 19:58
David Jones         Re: Penalty for no/bad SPF Wed, 24 Jan, 20:12
Dianne Skoll           Re: Penalty for no/bad SPF Wed, 24 Jan, 20:15
John Hardin             Re: Penalty for no/bad SPF Wed, 24 Jan, 22:20
Dianne Skoll               Re: Penalty for no/bad SPF Thu, 25 Jan, 01:01
John Hardin                 Re: Penalty for no/bad SPF Thu, 25 Jan, 01:24
Bill Cole               Re: Penalty for no/bad SPF Thu, 25 Jan, 04:20
John Hardin                 Re: Penalty for no/bad SPF Thu, 25 Jan, 04:36
Joseph Brennan           Re: Penalty for no/bad SPF Wed, 24 Jan, 21:45
David Jones             Re: Penalty for no/bad SPF Wed, 24 Jan, 22:04
Matus UHLAR - fantomas               Re: Penalty for no/bad SPF Thu, 25 Jan, 08:13
David Jones                 Re: Penalty for no/bad SPF Thu, 25 Jan, 13:11
Martin Gregorie             Re: Penalty for no/bad SPF Wed, 24 Jan, 22:16
John Hardin               Re: Penalty for no/bad SPF Wed, 24 Jan, 22:24
Martin Gregorie                 Re: Penalty for no/bad SPF Wed, 24 Jan, 23:00
Karol Augustin             Re: Penalty for no/bad SPF Thu, 25 Jan, 16:24
Pedro David Marco               Re: Penalty for no/bad SPF Thu, 25 Jan, 17:43
David Jones                 Re: Penalty for no/bad SPF Thu, 25 Jan, 17:53
Vincent Fox           Re: Penalty for no/bad SPF Wed, 24 Jan, 22:00
David Jones             Re: Penalty for no/bad SPF Wed, 24 Jan, 22:26
RW               Re: Penalty for no/bad SPF Thu, 25 Jan, 15:34
David Jones                 Re: Penalty for no/bad SPF Thu, 25 Jan, 15:53
RW                   Re: Penalty for no/bad SPF Thu, 25 Jan, 18:27
David Jones                     Re: Penalty for no/bad SPF Thu, 25 Jan, 18:48
David Jones                       Re: Penalty for no/bad SPF Thu, 25 Jan, 19:19
David Jones                         Re: Penalty for no/bad SPF Thu, 25 Jan, 19:45
David Jones                           Re: Penalty for no/bad SPF Thu, 25 Jan, 20:32
Joseph Brennan                       Re: Penalty for no/bad SPF Sat, 27 Jan, 22:48
David Jones     Re: Penalty for no/bad SPF Wed, 24 Jan, 19:42
Bill Cole   Re: Penalty for no/bad SPF Wed, 24 Jan, 19:33
David Jones     Re: Penalty for no/bad SPF Wed, 24 Jan, 19:59
Bill Cole       Re: Penalty for no/bad SPF Wed, 24 Jan, 23:10
Ian Zimmerman         Re: Penalty for no/bad SPF Wed, 24 Jan, 23:45
Bill Shirley       Re: Penalty for no/bad SPF Thu, 25 Jan, 10:19
Giovanni Bechis         Re: Penalty for no/bad SPF Thu, 25 Jan, 10:49
David Jones           Re: Penalty for no/bad SPF Thu, 25 Jan, 13:22
Dianne Skoll         Re: Penalty for no/bad SPF Thu, 25 Jan, 13:48
David Jones         Re: Penalty for no/bad SPF Thu, 25 Jan, 15:43
Rupert Gallagher   Re: Penalty for no/bad SPF Wed, 24 Jan, 23:00
Vincent Fox   Re: Penalty for no/bad SPF Wed, 24 Jan, 23:22
Palvelin Postmaster Make test fails on macOS High Sierra - help needed Thu, 25 Jan, 09:54
Palvelin Postmaster   Re: Make test fails on macOS High Sierra - help needed Thu, 25 Jan, 10:09
Bill Cole   Re: Make test fails on macOS High Sierra - help needed Fri, 26 Jan, 05:59
Palvelin Postmaster     Re: Make test fails on macOS High Sierra - help needed Mon, 29 Jan, 13:43
John Hardin       Re: Make test fails on macOS High Sierra - help needed Mon, 29 Jan, 16:59
Dave Wreski ***UNCHECKED*** Can't locate object method "trim_domain" Fri, 26 Jan, 18:06
Giovanni Bechis   Re: ***UNCHECKED*** Can't locate object method "trim_domain" Fri, 26 Jan, 21:40
Ian Zimmerman     Unchecked ??? [Was: Can't locate object method "trim_domain"] Sat, 27 Jan, 01:35
John Hardin       Re: Unchecked ??? [Was: Can't locate object method "trim_domain"] Sat, 27 Jan, 02:07
b..@inter-control.com ***UNCHECKED*** TEST TEST Fri, 26 Jan, 18:39
Ted Mittelstaedt New idea for stopping spam Fri, 26 Jan, 19:49
Dianne Skoll   Re: New idea for stopping spam Fri, 26 Jan, 20:01
David Jones   Re: New idea for stopping spam Fri, 26 Jan, 20:04
Axb   Re: New idea for stopping spam Sat, 27 Jan, 14:13
Joseph Brennan   Re: New idea for stopping spam Sat, 27 Jan, 22:31
b..@inter-control.com Scoring Issues Fri, 26 Jan, 20:39
David Jones   Re: Scoring Issues Fri, 26 Jan, 20:48
b..@inter-control.com     Re: Scoring Issues Fri, 26 Jan, 21:17
b..@inter-control.com     Re: Scoring Issues Fri, 26 Jan, 21:20
John Hardin       Re: Scoring Issues Fri, 26 Jan, 22:20
Computer Bob         Re: Scoring Issues Fri, 26 Jan, 22:28
Computer Bob         Re: Scoring Issues Fri, 26 Jan, 22:32
Computer Bob         Re: Scoring Issues Fri, 26 Jan, 22:47
Bill Cole           Re: Scoring Issues Sat, 27 Jan, 03:24
David B Funk         Re: Scoring Issues Fri, 26 Jan, 22:54
Daniele Duca           Re: Scoring Issues Sat, 27 Jan, 10:35
Matus UHLAR - fantomas             Re: Scoring Issues Sat, 27 Jan, 12:07
David Jones             Re: Scoring Issues Sat, 27 Jan, 13:01
Daniele Duca               Re: Scoring Issues Sat, 27 Jan, 15:32
Ralph Seichter                 Re: Scoring Issues Sat, 27 Jan, 18:29
Daniele Duca                   Re: Scoring Issues Sun, 28 Jan, 08:50
Computer Bob                     Re: Scoring Issues Tue, 30 Jan, 17:31
Computer Bob                       Re: Scoring Issues Tue, 30 Jan, 17:47
David Jones                         Re: Scoring Issues Tue, 30 Jan, 19:37
Computer Bob                           Re: Scoring Issues Tue, 30 Jan, 19:43
Benny Pedersen             Re: Scoring Issues Sat, 27 Jan, 22:24
Matus UHLAR - fantomas   Re: Scoring Issues Sat, 27 Jan, 10:20
Chip Shortcircuit reports only 1 test Sun, 28 Jan, 18:36
Benny Pedersen   Re: Shortcircuit reports only 1 test Sun, 28 Jan, 18:46
David Jones   Re: Shortcircuit reports only 1 test Sun, 28 Jan, 19:53
Chip     Re: Shortcircuit reports only 1 test Sun, 28 Jan, 20:01
David Jones       Re: Shortcircuit reports only 1 test Sun, 28 Jan, 20:09
David Jones         Re: Shortcircuit reports only 1 test Sun, 28 Jan, 20:12
Chip           Re: Shortcircuit reports only 1 test Sun, 28 Jan, 20:15
Benny Pedersen       Re: Shortcircuit reports only 1 test Sun, 28 Jan, 20:25
David Jones         Re: Shortcircuit reports only 1 test Sun, 28 Jan, 21:52
Chip           Shortcircuit reports only 1 test Sun, 28 Jan, 23:20
Chip           Re: Shortcircuit reports only 1 test Sun, 28 Jan, 23:56
Matus UHLAR - fantomas   Re: Shortcircuit reports only 1 test Mon, 29 Jan, 09:12
David Jones DocuSign spoof Mon, 29 Jan, 17:53
Kevin A. McGrail   Re: DocuSign spoof Mon, 29 Jan, 18:06
David Jones     Re: DocuSign spoof Mon, 29 Jan, 18:18
Jonathan Sélea Is SpamAssassin using ARC-headers? Tue, 30 Jan, 10:04
Benny Pedersen   Re: Is SpamAssassin using ARC-headers? Tue, 30 Jan, 10:53
Kevin A. McGrail     Re: Is SpamAssassin using ARC-headers? Tue, 30 Jan, 13:17
Benny Pedersen       Re: Is SpamAssassin using ARC-headers? Tue, 30 Jan, 13:27
A. Schulze SA-Update error "failed to run FORGED_GMAIL_RCVD test" Tue, 30 Jan, 11:43
Giovanni Bechis   Re: SA-Update error "failed to run FORGED_GMAIL_RCVD test" Tue, 30 Jan, 11:55
A. Schulze     Re: SA-Update error "failed to run FORGED_GMAIL_RCVD test" Tue, 30 Jan, 12:22
Alex       Re: SA-Update error "failed to run FORGED_GMAIL_RCVD test" Tue, 30 Jan, 12:33
Alex         Re: SA-Update error "failed to run FORGED_GMAIL_RCVD test" Tue, 30 Jan, 12:46
Kevin A. McGrail           Re: SA-Update error "failed to run FORGED_GMAIL_RCVD test" Tue, 30 Jan, 13:21
David Jones           Re: SA-Update error "failed to run FORGED_GMAIL_RCVD test" Tue, 30 Jan, 13:22
David Jones             Re: SA-Update error "failed to run FORGED_GMAIL_RCVD test" Tue, 30 Jan, 15:25
Matthias Egger     Re: SA-Update error "failed to run FORGED_GMAIL_RCVD test" Tue, 30 Jan, 12:30
Message list1 · 2 · Next »Thread · Author · Date
Box list
Nov 2021125
Oct 202181
Sep 2021105
Aug 202174
Jul 2021165
Jun 202170
May 2021183
Apr 2021422
Mar 2021127
Feb 2021177
Jan 2021122
Dec 2020172
Nov 2020190
Oct 2020155
Sep 2020108
Aug 2020130
Jul 2020601
Jun 202081
May 2020159
Apr 202043
Mar 202047
Feb 202097
Jan 2020134
Dec 2019148
Nov 2019226
Oct 201976
Sep 2019169
Aug 201997
Jul 2019105
Jun 2019241
May 2019227
Apr 201975
Mar 2019130
Feb 2019146
Jan 2019121
Dec 2018226
Nov 2018313
Oct 2018280
Sep 2018168
Aug 2018111
Jul 2018134
Jun 2018162
May 2018203
Apr 2018362
Mar 2018173
Feb 2018396
Jan 2018400
Dec 2017261
Nov 2017286
Oct 2017248
Sep 2017254
Aug 2017225
Jul 2017220
Jun 2017146
May 2017263
Apr 2017173
Mar 2017161
Feb 2017191
Jan 2017198
Dec 2016110
Nov 2016174
Oct 2016222
Sep 2016387
Aug 2016417
Jul 2016220
Jun 2016437
May 2016330
Apr 2016202
Mar 2016310
Feb 2016263
Jan 2016258
Dec 2015383
Nov 2015278
Oct 2015312
Sep 2015366
Aug 2015162
Jul 2015257
Jun 2015380
May 2015215
Apr 2015317
Mar 2015491
Feb 2015461
Jan 2015286
Dec 2014308
Nov 2014547
Oct 2014643
Sep 2014513
Aug 2014577
Jul 2014540
Jun 2014383
May 2014273
Apr 2014213
Mar 2014144
Feb 2014316
Jan 2014211
Dec 2013105
Nov 2013240
Oct 2013331
Sep 2013222
Aug 2013290
Jul 2013236
Jun 2013335
May 2013320
Apr 2013308
Mar 2013241
Feb 2013284
Jan 2013163
Dec 2012185
Nov 2012231
Oct 2012283
Sep 2012183
Aug 2012231
Jul 2012117
Jun 2012210
May 2012113
Apr 2012215
Mar 2012416
Feb 2012300
Jan 2012178
Dec 2011328
Nov 2011421
Oct 2011493
Sep 2011173
Aug 2011292
Jul 2011366
Jun 2011380
May 2011232
Apr 2011310
Mar 2011519
Feb 2011323
Jan 2011366
Dec 2010467
Nov 2010349
Oct 2010403
Sep 2010375
Aug 2010452
Jul 2010417
Jun 2010484
May 2010348
Apr 2010663
Mar 2010872
Feb 2010779
Jan 2010904
Dec 2009800
Nov 2009569
Oct 20091015
Sep 2009743
Aug 2009814
Jul 20091312
Jun 20091048
May 20091220
Apr 2009840
Mar 2009857
Feb 2009635
Jan 2009698
Dec 2008758
Nov 2008549
Oct 2008741
Sep 2008782
Aug 2008539
Jul 2008675
Jun 2008875
May 2008733
Apr 2008815
Mar 2008963
Feb 20081006
Jan 2008735
Dec 2007445
Nov 2007491
Oct 2007751
Sep 2007739
Aug 20071604
Jul 20071566
Jun 20071243
May 20071156
Apr 2007790
Mar 20071076
Feb 20071252
Jan 20071284
Dec 20061679
Nov 20062061
Oct 20062019
Sep 20061123
Aug 20062057
Jul 20061152
Jun 20061315
May 20061294
Apr 20061039
Mar 20061321
Feb 20061434
Jan 20061005
Dec 20051182
Nov 2005997
Oct 2005821
Sep 20051152
Aug 20051027
Jul 20051239
Jun 20051267
May 20051795
Apr 2005956
Mar 20051283
Feb 20051205
Jan 20051400
Dec 20041379
Nov 20041323
Oct 20041702
Sep 20041983
Aug 20041472
Jul 20041844
Jun 20042022
May 20041974
Apr 20042478
Mar 20042830
Feb 20042380
Jan 200426