Return-Path: X-Original-To: archive-asf-public-internal@cust-asf2.ponee.io Delivered-To: archive-asf-public-internal@cust-asf2.ponee.io Received: from cust-asf.ponee.io (cust-asf.ponee.io [163.172.22.183]) by cust-asf2.ponee.io (Postfix) with ESMTP id D729E200D5C for ; Fri, 15 Dec 2017 16:00:22 +0100 (CET) Received: by cust-asf.ponee.io (Postfix) id D5900160C14; Fri, 15 Dec 2017 15:00:22 +0000 (UTC) Delivered-To: archive-asf-public@cust-asf.ponee.io Received: from mail.apache.org (hermes.apache.org [140.211.11.3]) by cust-asf.ponee.io (Postfix) with SMTP id 25F26160C06 for ; Fri, 15 Dec 2017 16:00:21 +0100 (CET) Received: (qmail 45906 invoked by uid 500); 15 Dec 2017 15:00:20 -0000 Mailing-List: contact users-help@spamassassin.apache.org; run by ezmlm Precedence: bulk list-help: list-unsubscribe: List-Post: List-Id: Delivered-To: mailing list users@spamassassin.apache.org Received: (qmail 45891 invoked by uid 99); 15 Dec 2017 15:00:20 -0000 Received: from pnap-us-west-generic-nat.apache.org (HELO spamd3-us-west.apache.org) (209.188.14.142) by apache.org (qpsmtpd/0.29) with ESMTP; Fri, 15 Dec 2017 15:00:20 +0000 Received: from localhost (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by spamd3-us-west.apache.org (ASF Mail Server at spamd3-us-west.apache.org) with ESMTP id E332E180A2B for ; Fri, 15 Dec 2017 15:00:19 +0000 (UTC) X-Virus-Scanned: Debian amavisd-new at spamd3-us-west.apache.org X-Spam-Flag: NO X-Spam-Score: -3.002 X-Spam-Level: X-Spam-Status: No, score=-3.002 tagged_above=-999 required=6.31 tests=[HTML_MESSAGE=2, RCVD_IN_DNSWL_HI=-5, SPF_HELO_PASS=-0.001, SPF_PASS=-0.001] autolearn=disabled Received: from mx1-lw-eu.apache.org ([10.40.0.8]) by localhost (spamd3-us-west.apache.org [10.40.0.10]) (amavisd-new, port 10024) with ESMTP id Azc8vGlDfR49 for ; Fri, 15 Dec 2017 15:00:18 +0000 (UTC) Received: from intel1.peregrinehw.com (intel1.peregrinehw.com [38.124.232.10]) by mx1-lw-eu.apache.org (ASF Mail Server at mx1-lw-eu.apache.org) with ESMTPS id 3F9845F20B for ; Fri, 15 Dec 2017 15:00:18 +0000 (UTC) Received: from [10.10.11.221] (localhost.localdomain [127.0.0.1]) (authenticated bits=0) by intel1.peregrinehw.com (8.14.9/8.14.9) with ESMTP id vBFF0AIi013573; Fri, 15 Dec 2017 10:00:11 -0500 Subject: Re: Compiled rulesets and sa-update To: users References: <3482768.FYpaACJazX@mako.vk5ztv.ampr.org> From: "Kevin A. McGrail" Message-ID: <82e8c5b1-7087-4868-f98d-eb25df019dd7@mcgrail.com> Date: Fri, 15 Dec 2017 10:00:14 -0500 User-Agent: Mozilla/5.0 (Windows NT 10.0; WOW64; rv:52.0) Gecko/20100101 Thunderbird/52.5.0 MIME-Version: 1.0 In-Reply-To: <3482768.FYpaACJazX@mako.vk5ztv.ampr.org> Content-Type: multipart/alternative; boundary="------------22410BA383B908EBC79E370F" Content-Language: en-US X-PCCC-Virus-Scan: No X-KAM-Reverse-AUTH: Exempt - 127.0.0.1 is an Authorized Sender X-PCCC-Authorized-User-Relay: 127.0.0.1 X-PCCC-SA-Scanned: No: Auth User X-Scanned-By: MIMEDefang 2.79 on 38.124.232.10 archived-at: Fri, 15 Dec 2017 15:00:23 -0000 This is a multi-part message in MIME format. --------------22410BA383B908EBC79E370F Content-Type: text/plain; charset=windows-1252; format=flowed Content-Transfer-Encoding: 8bit On 12/15/2017 7:47 AM, Rodney Baker wrote: > > Hi all. I run compiled rulesets on my home mail server (which runs on > a Raspberry Pi), which I found necessary to reduce CPU utilisation > when it was running on a Raspberry Pi model A (it worked, but it's now > on a RasPi 3 which is much better). Do I need to run sa-compile after > every sa-update run? > Hi Rodney, you'll want to join the mailing list for any future emails.� I moderated you through and bcc'd you so you would get the response. sa-update changes the rules so if you don't compile the new rules, I am not sure if you will use the new set uncompiled or the old set compiled.� So the short answer is, yes, compile the rules any time they change :-) regards, KAM --------------22410BA383B908EBC79E370F Content-Type: text/html; charset=windows-1252 Content-Transfer-Encoding: 8bit
On 12/15/2017 7:47 AM, Rodney Baker wrote:

Hi all. I run compiled rulesets on my home mail server (which runs on a Raspberry Pi), which I found necessary to reduce CPU utilisation when it was running on a Raspberry Pi model A (it worked, but it's now on a RasPi 3 which is much better). Do I need to run sa-compile after every sa-update run?

Hi Rodney, you'll want to join the mailing list for any future emails.� I moderated you through and bcc'd you so you would get the response.

sa-update changes the rules so if you don't compile the new rules, I am not sure if you will use the new set uncompiled or the old set compiled.� So the short answer is, yes, compile the rules any time they change :-)

regards,
KAM
--------------22410BA383B908EBC79E370F--