spamassassin-users mailing list archives

Site index · List index
Message view « Date » · « Thread »
Top « Date » · « Thread »
From Matus UHLAR - fantomas <>
Subject Re: HTML_IMAGE_ONLY_* generating too many FP's
Date Sat, 02 Dec 2017 13:03:21 GMT
>>On 28.11.17 19:39, Sebastian Arcus wrote:
>>>I'm having more and more problems with the HTML_IMAGE_ONLY_* set 
>>>of rules recently generating false positives.

>On 30/11/17 12:45, Matus UHLAR - fantomas wrote:
>>those have lower scorew with BAYES and network rules enabled.
>>configure BAYES and enable netowrk rules...

On 01.12.17 10:17, Sebastian Arcus wrote:
>Hi. I have BAYES enabled and DNSBL's enabled (I assume that's what 
>you mean by network rules?). I still think that a score of 1.6 is 
>quite a lot, considering that so many emails nowadays contain either 
>an embedded logo in the signature, with just a few words (in a quick 
>email reply, for example), or even images inserted, instead of 
>attached to the email. Please see below an example of a SA report:

>1.6 HTML_IMAGE_ONLY_24     BODY: HTML: images with 2000-2400 bytes of words
>2.0 BAYES_50               BODY: Bayes spam probability is 40 to 60%
>                             [score: 0.4808]

configuring BAYES includes training it, so your mail don't get 0.48 score.

>2.5 PYZOR_CHECK            Listed in Pyzor (

now I really wonder why you blame HTML_IMAGE_ONLY_24, when BAYES_50 and
PYZOR_CHECK gave you higher score each?

Matus UHLAR - fantomas, ;
Warning: I wish NOT to receive e-mail advertising to this address.
Varovanie: na tuto adresu chcem NEDOSTAVAT akukolvek reklamnu postu.
I just got lost in thought. It was unfamiliar territory. 

View raw message