Return-Path: X-Original-To: archive-asf-public-internal@cust-asf2.ponee.io Delivered-To: archive-asf-public-internal@cust-asf2.ponee.io Received: from cust-asf.ponee.io (cust-asf.ponee.io [163.172.22.183]) by cust-asf2.ponee.io (Postfix) with ESMTP id 0B342200CF7 for ; Tue, 19 Sep 2017 13:31:59 +0200 (CEST) Received: by cust-asf.ponee.io (Postfix) id 09BE81609DD; Tue, 19 Sep 2017 11:31:59 +0000 (UTC) Delivered-To: archive-asf-public@cust-asf.ponee.io Received: from mail.apache.org (hermes.apache.org [140.211.11.3]) by cust-asf.ponee.io (Postfix) with SMTP id 2A7061609DB for ; Tue, 19 Sep 2017 13:31:58 +0200 (CEST) Received: (qmail 32748 invoked by uid 500); 19 Sep 2017 11:31:56 -0000 Mailing-List: contact users-help@spamassassin.apache.org; run by ezmlm Precedence: bulk list-help: list-unsubscribe: List-Post: List-Id: Delivered-To: mailing list users@spamassassin.apache.org Delivered-To: moderator for users@spamassassin.apache.org Received: (qmail 4613 invoked by uid 99); 19 Sep 2017 06:44:58 -0000 X-Virus-Scanned: Debian amavisd-new at spamd1-us-west.apache.org X-Spam-Flag: NO X-Spam-Score: 2.129 X-Spam-Level: ** X-Spam-Status: No, score=2.129 tagged_above=-999 required=6.31 tests=[DKIM_SIGNED=0.1, DKIM_VALID=-0.1, DKIM_VALID_AU=-0.1, FREEMAIL_ENVFROM_END_DIGIT=0.25, HTML_MESSAGE=2, RCVD_IN_DNSWL_NONE=-0.0001, RCVD_IN_MSPIKE_H3=-0.01, RCVD_IN_MSPIKE_WL=-0.01, RP_MATCHES_RCVD=-0.001, SPF_PASS=-0.001, URIBL_BLOCKED=0.001] autolearn=disabled Authentication-Results: spamd1-us-west.apache.org (amavisd-new); dkim=pass (2048-bit key) header.d=yahoo.com DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=yahoo.com; s=s2048; t=1505803490; bh=lFvH2eI2jHFGwCpr9RgW4Fqq+ndmJRDBT5XUuhq9TXE=; h=Subject:To:References:From:Date:In-Reply-To:From:Subject; b=ulJnhZxRH1fIw4MURFTBZt7IWiCkyXmZ5BGULOU5WXVxuWPHSJOF6ob62OVA/1A98D8cOy4B5rLaLHAO7dAZXhUkbwk1bHCpVb9mNJ+d94wVhgl9ZTAI5Yt8VtSflKexO0gAG0FrH5vqn4rXygKty+4RDNYE1E3szdT9a9TlYJMzGHHh4QGWX8zOGy6iv1ZITx6BVRH2oltW1LQZHu9y5h/9GDuCYs1mBNoxS/ik0bQvE10LS03pO4vOpXA+Xikiwjf6nGhJmNmxhaXpY/iSBnUzPqnqf3Yz/jbBnnYCvHMWEsXfl5o/FULOteZKsIY6O8P7JUQu+F03JoqdOVbi8w== X-YMail-OSG: Hx4lsTMVM1l8EIbDMo_PajMSc55bD_2MnNY.Cix1WsTSImkIXwaYX2T3zG9c_J9 8UH1c9HYvFEV1YO2CZpwkHHVqrJf0lCsgEUARuGwOGcBiDCEHKc0NJINdA1o.TduPd.WJ32e27P7 O_rmZM4oZgaum3hz1qindSg00QouXixfhVy811rNqr7gHV7Ivth61oFSM8AUfn8NFfGi6DK5VTTp S5SCifsiA31O37mrsTewhk52KJOlnh1bobDkEToqtSOfiIAGcTuMFxgdEKlnl2RIEckyvdnMxHc9 hBQGOdBa1LfWtBVsdZl0RsReLj8v5Ul8YALMq1c15WrkW7_bA9h_sPvvv7jaFjFHXqn04WuClq.j gtvCUkez6zN6A0lcqN2uwlfeOi38_vnS1uGZe_kQB_YAh1IaFa2opf.q.Waza6jX5mnMQpzm3rPu BnXfqToXHhREKxbdNnO2Qi8dtfP1icqLWYp0mXK0VDrTv8LDe25MmbS28RyeRdkIBdQVPUgRo5CF qM4YgmnaZmPpFGs8V55XXDSqn X-Yahoo-Newman-Id: 320399.4984.bm@smtp128.mail.ir2.yahoo.com X-Yahoo-Newman-Property: ymail-3 X-YMail-OSG: Hx4lsTMVM1l8EIbDMo_PajMSc55bD_2MnNY.Cix1WsTSImk IXwaYX2T3zG9c_J98UH1c9HYvFEV1YO2CZpwkHHVqrJf0lCsgEUARuGwOGcB iDCEHKc0NJINdA1o.TduPd.WJ32e27P7O_rmZM4oZgaum3hz1qindSg00Qou XixfhVy811rNqr7gHV7Ivth61oFSM8AUfn8NFfGi6DK5VTTpS5SCifsiA31O 37mrsTewhk52KJOlnh1bobDkEToqtSOfiIAGcTuMFxgdEKlnl2RIEckyvdnM xHc9hBQGOdBa1LfWtBVsdZl0RsReLj8v5Ul8YALMq1c15WrkW7_bA9h_sPvv v7jaFjFHXqn04WuClq.jgtvCUkez6zN6A0lcqN2uwlfeOi38_vnS1uGZe_kQ B_YAh1IaFa2opf.q.Waza6jX5mnMQpzm3rPuBnXfqToXHhREKxbdNnO2Qi8d tfP1icqLWYp0mXK0VDrTv8LDe25MmbS28RyeRdkIBdQVPUgRo5CFqM4Ygmna ZmPpFGs8V55XXDSqn X-Yahoo-SMTP: L0Ri6HeswBC0bM9NHUWOBOoufiqh1Seb7yr1nn4- Subject: Re: OT - Hotmail/Outlook.com marking most of our email as Junk To: users@spamassassin.apache.org References: From: G Roach Message-ID: Date: Tue, 19 Sep 2017 07:44:38 +0100 User-Agent: Mozilla/5.0 (Windows NT 6.1; WOW64; rv:45.0) Gecko/20100101 Thunderbird/45.1.1 MIME-Version: 1.0 In-Reply-To: Content-Type: multipart/alternative; boundary="------------83C700F3E2DB7908EAC60D33" archived-at: Tue, 19 Sep 2017 11:31:59 -0000 This is a multi-part message in MIME format. --------------83C700F3E2DB7908EAC60D33 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=utf-8; format=flowed Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit Microsoft use their own methods of detection including based on reputation and 'length of service' - ie, if you have only just started sending emails out from your own address (which you have) then they may well consider you suspicious. Theres not much yo can do about it. More info here: https://mail.live.com/mail/troubleshooting.aspx On 19/09/2017 07:25, Sebastian Arcus wrote: > This is a bit off topic as it is not directly related to SA, but I'm > hoping that with the email and spam expertise on this group, someone > might throw in a useful idea - which would be much appreciated. > > I have this problem on one site where most emails we send to > Hotmail/Outlook.com/Live.com email addresses end up in Junk at the > recipient's end. Things I have tried: > > 1. I've setup SPF, DKIM, DMARC (and set it to 'reject'). > > 2. We used to smart relay outbound email through the hosting provider > (1and1), but now changed to send directly from our own IP address, so > that we can control the reputation of the sending IP - no change. > > 3. I've checked our public IP and the domain name at mxtoolbox.com - > all tests pass (the public IP has been delisted from the Spamhaus > non-MX/end-user IP database). > > 4. I've setup forward and reverse DNS entries for our IP address. > > 5. I've checked with all DNS blocklists/blacklists I could find - our > domain or IP address is not flagged up anywhere. > > 6. This is a small network which I've been managing for years - the > domain name has not been used to send marketing/lists email of any > sort - so the historic reputation should be fine. > > 7. I've setup a monitor and block on port 25 outbound on the network > firewall - in case there is a trojan on a machine on the network > sending out spam and ruining the reputation of our IP - it's never > been triggered. > > 8. I've checked the contents of outgoing emails - this is an > accountants practice - the email content is standard, there is nothing > there which should trigger bayesian filters. > > 9. I've sent emails to other servers under my control running SA - the > scores come out perfect at the receiving end. > > 10. The emails we send are operational and notices emails to customers > - who need them. They call on the phone and complain they haven't > received them - just to discover they were sent, but ended up in the > junk. > > 11. Emails we send to any other domains are never a problem spam-wise. > > I can't really think of anything else to try - have I missed anything? > Are Hotmail/Outlook.com spam filters a complete lottery? --------------83C700F3E2DB7908EAC60D33 Content-Type: text/html; charset=utf-8 Content-Transfer-Encoding: 8bit Microsoft use their own methods of detection including based on reputation and 'length of service' - ie, if you have only just started sending emails out from your own address (which you have) then they may well consider you suspicious. Theres not much yo can do about it.   More info here: https://mail.live.com/mail/troubleshooting.aspx



On 19/09/2017 07:25, Sebastian Arcus wrote:
This is a bit off topic as it is not directly related to SA, but I'm hoping that with the email and spam expertise on this group, someone might throw in a useful idea - which would be much appreciated.

I have this problem on one site where most emails we send to Hotmail/Outlook.com/Live.com email addresses end up in Junk at the recipient's end. Things I have tried:

1. I've setup SPF, DKIM, DMARC (and set it to 'reject').

2. We used to smart relay outbound email through the hosting provider (1and1), but now changed to send directly from our own IP address, so that we can control the reputation of the sending IP - no change.

3. I've checked our public IP and the domain name at mxtoolbox.com - all tests pass (the public IP has been delisted from the Spamhaus non-MX/end-user IP database).

4. I've setup forward and reverse DNS entries for our IP address.

5. I've checked with all DNS blocklists/blacklists I could find - our domain or IP address is not flagged up anywhere.

6. This is a small network which I've been managing for years - the domain name has not been used to send marketing/lists email of any sort - so the historic reputation should be fine.

7. I've setup a monitor and block on port 25 outbound on the network firewall - in case there is a trojan on a machine on the network sending out spam and ruining the reputation of our IP - it's never been triggered.

8. I've checked the contents of outgoing emails - this is an accountants practice - the email content is standard, there is nothing there which should trigger bayesian filters.

9. I've sent emails to other servers under my control running SA - the scores come out perfect at the receiving end.

10. The emails we send are operational and notices emails to customers - who need them. They call on the phone and complain they haven't received them - just to discover they were sent, but ended up in the junk.

11. Emails we send to any other domains are never a problem spam-wise.

I can't really think of anything else to try - have I missed anything? Are Hotmail/Outlook.com spam filters a complete lottery?

--------------83C700F3E2DB7908EAC60D33-- .