spamassassin-users mailing list archives

Site index · List index
Message view « Date » · « Thread »
Top « Date » · « Thread »
From "Kevin A. McGrail" <kevin.mcgr...@mcgrail.com>
Subject Re: ISIPP - Re: bb.barracudacentral.org
Date Mon, 18 Sep 2017 14:12:20 GMT
On 9/16/2017 4:36 PM, Chris wrote:
> I'm also seeing issues with ISIPP which is in 20_dnsbl_tests.cf. I've
> attached the message I sent them as well as their reply. Another issue
> I noticed with ISIPP is
>
> Sep 16 12:09:38 localhost named[1284]: host unreachable resolving
> 'ns1.ns.isipp.com/A/IN': 67.227.190.38#53
> Sep 16 12:09:38 localhost named[1284]: host unreachable resolving
> 'ns2.ns.isipp.com/A/IN': 67.227.190.38#53
>
> My network is up
>
> chris@localhost:~$ time host isipp.com
> isipp.com has address 67.227.187.192
> isipp.com mail is handled by 5 smtp.secureserver.net.
> isipp.com mail is handled by 0 concerto.isipp.com.
> isipp.com mail is handled by 10 mailstore1.secureserver.net.
>
> real    0m0.866s
> user    0m0.008s
> sys    0m0.004s
> chris@localhost:~$ time host isipp.com
> isipp.com has address 67.227.187.192
> isipp.com mail is handled by 0 concerto.isipp.com.
> isipp.com mail is handled by 10 mailstore1.secureserver.net.
> isipp.com mail is handled by 5 smtp.secureserver.net.
>
> real    0m0.010s
> user    0m0.008s
> sys    0m0.000s
>
> Problem, or something I shouldn't concern myself about?

Good question.  Perhaps another rate-limit issue or they block dynamic IPs.

I took this off-list by accident but Chris has low volume and uses a 
Dynamic IP.  I wonder if ISIPP is similar to barracuda in that it should 
be considered for removal from the default rules. Anyone have any feedback?

regards,
KAM

Mime
View raw message