spamassassin-users mailing list archives

Site index · List index
Message view « Date » · « Thread »
Top « Date » · « Thread »
From "Christoffer G. Thomsen" <li...@cgt.name>
Subject Re: Additional great BlackList to use
Date Wed, 09 Nov 2016 18:54:17 GMT
I'm pretty sure McAfee's DNSBL is just a mirror of Spamhaus Zen, which
of course is highly effective. I'm a bit wary of psky. Delisting is
"coming soon", and it's not clear who is behind it.

I am using the NiX DNSBL as well as their ixhash service and they both
work well for me. I am also using all.s5h.net, which seems very reliable
and frequently catches spam senders that no one else does. I have not
had any false positives with it on my single-user mail server.

Christoffer G. Thomsen

On 2016-11-09 17:53, Nicola Piazzi wrote:
> Here some results of some 'unconventional' rbl that worked great in my
> system,
> 
> I tested spam/ham in the most true mode possible, adding the score that
> each rule give to consider a spam in count
> 
> For example, if a rule that have a score of 5 i count spam emails that
> have this rule and a score of 4 (default) + 5 (rule score) = 9
> 
>  
> 
> Here in order :
> 
>  
> 
> [McAfee] (Absolutely the best, and I think that very few people know it)
> 
> Total Hit 10.779
> 
> Spam 10.766
> 
> Ham 13
> 
> Accuracy Very High 99,9%
> 
> Volume Very High 5,0%
> 
> header    C_RBL_MCAFEE          eval:check_rbl('mcafee-lastexternal',
> 'cidr.bl.mcafee.com.')
> 
> describe  C_RBL_MCAFEE          Listed in cidr.bl.mcafee.com
> 
> tflags    C_RBL_MCAFEE          net
> 
> score     C_RBL_MCAFEE          7.00
> 
>  
> 
> [imp.ch]
> 
> Total Hit 330
> 
> Spam 329
> 
> Ham 1
> 
> Accuracy Very High 99,7%
> 
> Volume Very Low 0,2%
> 
> header    C_RBL_IMP_SPAMLIST    eval:check_rbl('spamrbl-lastexternal',
> 'spamrbl.imp.ch.', '127.0.0.5')
> 
> describe  C_RBL_IMP_SPAMLIST    Listed in spamrbl.imp.ch
> 
> tflags    C_RBL_IMP_SPAMLIST    net
> 
> score     C_RBL_IMP_SPAMLIST    3.00
> 
>  
> 
> [psky]
> 
> Total Hit 13.027
> 
> Spam 12.939
> 
> Ham 88
> 
> Accuracy Very High 99,3%
> 
> Volume Very High 6,0%
> 
> header     __C_RBL_PSKY         
> eval:check_rbl('bad-psky-me-lastexternal','bad.psky.me.')
> 
> describe   __C_RBL_PSKY          Check bad.psky.me
> 
> tflags     __C_RBL_PSKY          net
> 
> reuse      __C_RBL_PSKY
> 
> header     C_RBL_PSKY_BAD       
> eval:check_rbl_sub('bad-psky-me-lastexternal', '127.0.0.3')
> 
> describe   C_RBL_PSKY_BAD        Listed in psky.me - Bad
> 
> score      C_RBL_PSKY_BAD        2.80
> 
> tflags     C_RBL_PSKY_BAD        net
> 
> reuse      C_RBL_PSKY_BAD
> 
> header     C_RBL_PSKY_POOR      
> eval:check_rbl_sub('bad-psky-me-lastexternal', '127.0.0.2')
> 
> describe   C_RBL_PSKY_POOR       Listed in psky.me - Poor
> 
> score      C_RBL_PSKY_POOR       0.80
> 
> tflags     C_RBL_PSKY_POOR       net
> 
> reuse      C_RBL_PSKY_POOR
> 
>  
> 
>  
> 
> [Gbudb]
> 
> Total Hit 4.946
> 
> Spam 4.891
> 
> Ham 55
> 
> Accuracy High 98,9%
> 
> Volume High 2,3%
> 
> header    C_RBL_GBUDB           eval:check_rbl('truncate-lastexternal',
> 'truncate.gbudb.net.')
> 
> describe  C_RBL_GBUDB           Listed in truncate.gbudb.net
> 
> tflags    C_RBL_GBUDB           net
> 
> score     C_RBL_GBUDB           5.00
> 
>  
> 
> [Inps.de]
> 
> Total Hit 7.963
> 
> Spam 7.774
> 
> Ham 189
> 
> Accuracy High 97,6%
> 
> Volume High 3,7%
> 
> header    C_RBL_DNSBL_INPS_DE  
> eval:check_rbl('inps-de-lastexternal','dnsbl.inps.de.')
> 
> describe  C_RBL_DNSBL_INPS_DE   Received via a relay in inps.de DNSBL
> 
> tflags    C_RBL_DNSBL_INPS_DE   net
> 
> score     C_RBL_DNSBL_INPS_DE   3.00
> 
>  
> 
> [Blocklist.de]
> 
> Total Hit 330
> 
> Spam 321
> 
> Ham 9
> 
> Accuracy High 97,3%
> 
> Volume Very Low 0,2%
> 
> header    C_RBL_BLOCKLIST_DE   
> eval:check_rbl('bl.blocklist.de-lastexternal','bl.blocklist.de.')
> 
> describe  C_RBL_BLOCKLIST_DE    Listed in bl.blocklist.de
> 
> tflags    C_RBL_BLOCKLIST_DE    net
> 
> score     C_RBL_BLOCKLIST_DE    1.00
> 
>  
> 
> [Wpbl]
> 
> Total Hit 7.404
> 
> Spam 7.092
> 
> Ham 312
> 
> Accuracy High 95,8%
> 
> Volume Very High 3,4%
> 
> header    C_RBL_WPBL            eval:check_rbl('wpbl-lastexternal',
> 'db.wpbl.info.')
> 
> describe  C_RBL_WPBL            Listed in db.wpbl.info
> 
> tflags    C_RBL_WPBL            net
> 
> score     C_RBL_WPBL            2.50
> 
>  
> 
>  
> 
> [NiX Spam]
> 
> Total Hit 6.375
> 
> Spam 6.056
> 
> Ham 319
> 
> Accuracy Medium 95,0%
> 
> Volume High 2,9%
> 
> header    C_RBL_WPBL            eval:check_rbl('wpbl-lastexternal',
> 'db.wpbl.info.')
> 
> describe  C_RBL_WPBL            Listed in db.wpbl.info
> 
> tflags    C_RBL_WPBL            net
> 
> score     C_RBL_WPBL            2.50
> 
>  
> 
>  
> 
> Nicola Piazzi
> CED - Sistemi
> COMET s.p.a.
> Via Michelino, 105 - 40127 Bologna – Italia
> Tel.  +39 051.6079.293
> Cell. +39 328.21.73.470
> Web: www.gruppocomet.it <http://www.gruppocomet.it/>
> Descrizione: gc
> 
>  
> 

Mime
View raw message