Return-Path: X-Original-To: archive-asf-public-internal@cust-asf2.ponee.io Delivered-To: archive-asf-public-internal@cust-asf2.ponee.io Received: from cust-asf.ponee.io (cust-asf.ponee.io [163.172.22.183]) by cust-asf2.ponee.io (Postfix) with ESMTP id 1A753200B2F for ; Sun, 3 Jul 2016 20:55:57 +0200 (CEST) Received: by cust-asf.ponee.io (Postfix) id 18F46160A6B; Sun, 3 Jul 2016 18:55:57 +0000 (UTC) Delivered-To: archive-asf-public@cust-asf.ponee.io Received: from mail.apache.org (hermes.apache.org [140.211.11.3]) by cust-asf.ponee.io (Postfix) with SMTP id 5E8D7160A50 for ; Sun, 3 Jul 2016 20:55:56 +0200 (CEST) Received: (qmail 62477 invoked by uid 500); 3 Jul 2016 18:55:55 -0000 Mailing-List: contact users-help@spamassassin.apache.org; run by ezmlm Precedence: bulk list-help: list-unsubscribe: List-Post: List-Id: Delivered-To: mailing list users@spamassassin.apache.org Received: (qmail 62467 invoked by uid 99); 3 Jul 2016 18:55:55 -0000 Received: from pnap-us-west-generic-nat.apache.org (HELO spamd3-us-west.apache.org) (209.188.14.142) by apache.org (qpsmtpd/0.29) with ESMTP; Sun, 03 Jul 2016 18:55:55 +0000 Received: from localhost (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by spamd3-us-west.apache.org (ASF Mail Server at spamd3-us-west.apache.org) with ESMTP id 7F945180E73 for ; Sun, 3 Jul 2016 18:55:54 +0000 (UTC) X-Virus-Scanned: Debian amavisd-new at spamd3-us-west.apache.org X-Spam-Flag: NO X-Spam-Score: -2.127 X-Spam-Level: X-Spam-Status: No, score=-2.127 tagged_above=-999 required=6.31 tests=[RCVD_IN_DNSWL_LOW=-0.7, RP_MATCHES_RCVD=-1.426, SPF_PASS=-0.001] autolearn=disabled Received: from mx2-lw-us.apache.org ([10.40.0.8]) by localhost (spamd3-us-west.apache.org [10.40.0.10]) (amavisd-new, port 10024) with ESMTP id wDq4PI7QP8PP for ; Sun, 3 Jul 2016 18:55:52 +0000 (UTC) Received: from mail.thelounge.net (mail.thelounge.net [91.118.73.15]) by mx2-lw-us.apache.org (ASF Mail Server at mx2-lw-us.apache.org) with ESMTPS id BDDD55F1B8 for ; Sun, 3 Jul 2016 18:55:51 +0000 (UTC) Subject: Re: whitelist issues with sprintpcs.com To: users@spamassassin.apache.org References: <36cceebf-b0b8-3b6d-213b-c53ef57a1efa@thelounge.net> <10c32b240d6c88d1153b2720c8a8d3b6@junc.eu> <6fef7254-f35d-f411-f22c-998a7cc55663@thelounge.net> <5e66eaa56c63f43b17c5f4f5323b83ba@junc.eu> From: Reindl Harald Openpgp: id=13540402D67A7F71C6E974EA866063CF7F780279; url=https://arrakis.thelounge.net/gpg/h.reindl_thelounge.net.pub.txt Organization: the lounge interactive design Message-ID: Date: Sun, 3 Jul 2016 20:55:49 +0200 User-Agent: Mozilla/5.0 (X11; Linux x86_64; rv:45.0) Gecko/20100101 Thunderbird/45.1.1 MIME-Version: 1.0 In-Reply-To: <5e66eaa56c63f43b17c5f4f5323b83ba@junc.eu> Content-Type: multipart/signed; micalg=pgp-sha1; protocol="application/pgp-signature"; boundary="oFGSN0FpKRLFTdODUwSpFWaOtCF0F4iKn" archived-at: Sun, 03 Jul 2016 18:55:57 -0000 This is an OpenPGP/MIME signed message (RFC 4880 and 3156) --oFGSN0FpKRLFTdODUwSpFWaOtCF0F4iKn Content-Type: multipart/mixed; boundary="pffseu5AppXTMML5bp21ElWvNrbqITJus" From: Reindl Harald To: users@spamassassin.apache.org Message-ID: Subject: Re: whitelist issues with sprintpcs.com References: <36cceebf-b0b8-3b6d-213b-c53ef57a1efa@thelounge.net> <10c32b240d6c88d1153b2720c8a8d3b6@junc.eu> <6fef7254-f35d-f411-f22c-998a7cc55663@thelounge.net> <5e66eaa56c63f43b17c5f4f5323b83ba@junc.eu> In-Reply-To: <5e66eaa56c63f43b17c5f4f5323b83ba@junc.eu> --pffseu5AppXTMML5bp21ElWvNrbqITJus Content-Type: text/plain; charset=windows-1252; format=flowed Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable Am 03.07.2016 um 20:36 schrieb Benny Pedersen: > On 2016-07-03 20:26, Reindl Harald wrote: > >> Envelope-Sender >> Resent-Sender >> X-Envelope-From >> From > > please tell me what mta add this headers as envelope_sender header ? obviously enough otherwise it would no exist > maybe you after that could tell who is idiot ? well, i can explain that in a better way EVERY header in doubt is forged, starting with From at the begin and=20 hence for x-headers SpamAssasin relys on internal_networks and/or=20 trusted_networks to know *which* headers are on your own side and which=20 are from untrsued networks hence all your first 3 or 4 replies are bullshit by definition nobody asked for unforgeable whitelisting since it#s not posible in the=20 case of the OP the following rule is the way to go whitelist_from_rcvd *@pm.sprint.com sprintpcs.com and *yes i know* that the PTR can be forged, since i control the=20 PTR-zones of our interfaces it would take 10 seconds to get a=20 something.sprintpcs.com the real problem of the OP is moste likely "(amavisd-new, port 10024)"=20 and so the SA-list is the wrong place for "why is whitelist_from_rcvd=20 from not working properly" --pffseu5AppXTMML5bp21ElWvNrbqITJus-- --oFGSN0FpKRLFTdODUwSpFWaOtCF0F4iKn Content-Type: application/pgp-signature; name="signature.asc" Content-Description: OpenPGP digital signature Content-Disposition: attachment; filename="signature.asc" -----BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE----- Version: GnuPG v2 iEYEARECAAYFAld5X7UACgkQhmBjz394AnlMzACdHXQXyG5t3GbAy/8AZ5xOB7g1 HScAnA/lMC59HLkhyRFBrAXxurWCa9ns =RjQZ -----END PGP SIGNATURE----- --oFGSN0FpKRLFTdODUwSpFWaOtCF0F4iKn--