Return-Path: X-Original-To: apmail-spamassassin-users-archive@www.apache.org Delivered-To: apmail-spamassassin-users-archive@www.apache.org Received: from mail.apache.org (hermes.apache.org [140.211.11.3]) by minotaur.apache.org (Postfix) with SMTP id 891381844A for ; Thu, 3 Mar 2016 20:17:37 +0000 (UTC) Received: (qmail 98308 invoked by uid 500); 3 Mar 2016 20:17:29 -0000 Delivered-To: apmail-spamassassin-users-archive@spamassassin.apache.org Received: (qmail 98283 invoked by uid 500); 3 Mar 2016 20:17:29 -0000 Mailing-List: contact users-help@spamassassin.apache.org; run by ezmlm Precedence: bulk list-help: list-unsubscribe: List-Post: List-Id: Delivered-To: mailing list users@spamassassin.apache.org Received: (qmail 98273 invoked by uid 99); 3 Mar 2016 20:17:29 -0000 Received: from pnap-us-west-generic-nat.apache.org (HELO spamd4-us-west.apache.org) (209.188.14.142) by apache.org (qpsmtpd/0.29) with ESMTP; Thu, 03 Mar 2016 20:17:29 +0000 Received: from localhost (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by spamd4-us-west.apache.org (ASF Mail Server at spamd4-us-west.apache.org) with ESMTP id D3F6EC06C5 for ; Thu, 3 Mar 2016 20:17:28 +0000 (UTC) X-Virus-Scanned: Debian amavisd-new at spamd4-us-west.apache.org X-Spam-Flag: NO X-Spam-Score: -0.821 X-Spam-Level: X-Spam-Status: No, score=-0.821 tagged_above=-999 required=6.31 tests=[DKIM_SIGNED=0.1, DKIM_VALID=-0.1, DKIM_VALID_AU=-0.1, RCVD_IN_DNSWL_LOW=-0.7, RCVD_IN_MSPIKE_H3=-0.01, RCVD_IN_MSPIKE_WL=-0.01, SPF_PASS=-0.001] autolearn=disabled Authentication-Results: spamd4-us-west.apache.org (amavisd-new); dkim=pass (2048-bit key) header.d=gmail.com Received: from mx2-lw-us.apache.org ([10.40.0.8]) by localhost (spamd4-us-west.apache.org [10.40.0.11]) (amavisd-new, port 10024) with ESMTP id BVyyYBoMuRup for ; Thu, 3 Mar 2016 20:17:28 +0000 (UTC) Received: from mail-wm0-f42.google.com (mail-wm0-f42.google.com [74.125.82.42]) by mx2-lw-us.apache.org (ASF Mail Server at mx2-lw-us.apache.org) with ESMTPS id 89DBB5F39E for ; Thu, 3 Mar 2016 20:17:27 +0000 (UTC) Received: by mail-wm0-f42.google.com with SMTP id l68so51010380wml.0 for ; Thu, 03 Mar 2016 12:17:27 -0800 (PST) DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=gmail.com; s=20120113; h=subject:to:references:from:message-id:date:user-agent:mime-version :in-reply-to:content-transfer-encoding; bh=ol8XWK/NEDwkDCz2NziJ4mE2BbuTFDJohIFtcZxFzaU=; b=HZxSOFKt0BD5S1WflK5REQe5xaHw5XWOtYKb5uHK4zyyryo+gOc5RmMpWbzC9i6h6o HfRZXauBOmMVfl9ntK9ZxOhmkYgfFWCGY/zYmgFSzlIrPbLlFAdROhj2Cmhpg2LvlbQy y/5Ppfok0ZWW1lrNSnT63MolTFiIrQEKKgPc6MAknhW+vQ9TdulSyGFfp4Ia/mofl2bd xUpyFNk3lMHuLdn94Xb/CCAmWRY5aV2/d3RL0fwLK4ow5RyLciPH9SiM5BHvqPUWfdFB 28d/jN4JCh7RbhMWM/AqXHMH1ZcEswdwQhgU+4K11IXgEO4lHiY7jZrYKKD/CUZ3mkqu 4zwg== X-Google-DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=1e100.net; s=20130820; h=x-gm-message-state:subject:to:references:from:message-id:date :user-agent:mime-version:in-reply-to:content-transfer-encoding; bh=ol8XWK/NEDwkDCz2NziJ4mE2BbuTFDJohIFtcZxFzaU=; b=nB6zQnrETr/h7A0TixILSZsNEb3jYPrqjGjfy/JgDWj+bCz5ZRYwquHqJFMBao5BZB /wK6l8/E0REkRODcYZlWD1xKrtLXr7/Eyjrk23RPnS7iqnr4Nx6y/cX9a6G9M++WCcnN I/jOeLqv8Rj2D9VRhniFJM8jctsdKjX6lhKfKU8Shd6E/aOuilROdAkykdLgO/cT/OS4 BrT1EnjsCaYRJSJwmpCDBrJ66BjBL7GKe7PCnvQopgUZW8WkT90Mjn9TrXvNoFPn2mbx zuEbKOULmtqMyyaJwnVvl4RcQDsCMfavfvp44r6CKTOG2HLXvvoyZJ9R2D2KQBsCMTH1 elig== X-Gm-Message-State: AD7BkJK0SkaTWljODzAuEmv5V6BIUIgTE/4gB2KeNZo7XU1fmkw9KJxtQk4Wh3X1d0Cldg== X-Received: by 10.28.64.198 with SMTP id n189mr890820wma.85.1457036246510; Thu, 03 Mar 2016 12:17:26 -0800 (PST) Received: from [192.168.192.3] (77-57-187-95.dclient.hispeed.ch. [77.57.187.95]) by smtp.gmail.com with ESMTPSA id jf6sm156254wjb.2.2016.03.03.12.17.25 for (version=TLS1_2 cipher=ECDHE-RSA-AES128-GCM-SHA256 bits=128/128); Thu, 03 Mar 2016 12:17:26 -0800 (PST) Subject: Re: RCVD_NUMERIC_HELO To: users@spamassassin.apache.org References: <15334568230.27d6.d475fad7b14312f5d8424e35e39f7512@junc.eu> <20160302131241.67f48c6c@gumby.homeunix.com> <56D6FF82.1030400@thelounge.net> <20160302211247.74040ff2@gumby.homeunix.com> <56D75EEB.5070600@thelounge.net> <20160302221347.2b7a7967@gumby.homeunix.com> <56D7684D.5030900@thelounge.net> <20160303124713.59140944@gumby.homeunix.com> <56D834F6.9020102@thelounge.net> <20160303140424.4c65c35a@gumby.homeunix.com> <56D847BC.3080901@thelounge.net> <20160303165417.15679cf2@gumby.homeunix.com> <56D879B1.7030705@thelounge.net> <20160303183936.48a5ecde@gumby.homeunix.com> <56D88EBB.9080400@thelounge.net> <56D897AA.3000809@gmail.com> <56D89A20.7020708@thelounge.net> From: Axb Message-ID: <56D89BDC.2020408@gmail.com> Date: Thu, 3 Mar 2016 21:17:32 +0100 User-Agent: Mozilla/5.0 (X11; Linux x86_64; rv:38.0) Gecko/20100101 Thunderbird/38.6.0 MIME-Version: 1.0 In-Reply-To: <56D89A20.7020708@thelounge.net> Content-Type: text/plain; charset=utf-8; format=flowed Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit On 03/03/2016 09:10 PM, Reindl Harald wrote: > > Am 03.03.2016 um 20:59 schrieb Axb: >> On 03/03/2016 08:21 PM, Reindl Harald wrote: >>>>> how do you suppose the corpus to replace ones own thinking about the >>>>> *conditions* rules hit? >>>> >>>> I've no idea what the sentence means. >>> >>> the deep-header rules have to go away or rewritten to *not* do >>> deep-header tests - was that really so hard to parse? >> >> That YOU don't like deep header parsing rule doesn't mean that they're >> useless. >> >> Maybe it's time that you, as a self proclamied perfectionist, fork SA >> and do your thing. > > maybe *you* just start ignore posts where *you* think they are wrong, > the statements about rules of this thread are *not* only from *my* > networks - other sysadmins with different customers came to the same > conclusions and even reported the problems to me > > *so what* is your problem? > > shut down the mailing list if you only want posts defending *your* own > opinions and realize that others also have their expierence, sometimes > even more than you or other developers > > you want to ignore it? > *just do it* - i don't care > > but don't expect others to only post things confirming *your* opinion > and step a little back from your "i am a SA developer and so i am always > right" attitude You're totally right. You're bad for my blood pressure. There were times when this list was an inspiring place to be in. Times change... I'm outta here.