spamassassin-users mailing list archives

Site index · List index
Message view « Date » · « Thread »
Top « Date » · « Thread »
From Dianne Skoll <...@roaringpenguin.com>
Subject Catch rates (was Re: My new method for blocking spam - REVEALED!)
Date Thu, 21 Jan 2016 02:11:07 GMT
On Wed, 20 Jan 2016 15:37:33 -0800
jdow <jdow@earthlink.net> wrote:

> This observation invites a heretical question. Is nearly perfect spam 
> classification dangerous compared to merely 99.9%/0.1% accurate
> classification?

I think it's meaningless to talk about classifications better than 99.9%/0.1%
because I do not believe human beings will agree on what's spam vs ham
at that level of agreement.

Regards,

Dianne.

Mime
View raw message