spamassassin-users mailing list archives

Site index · List index
Message view « Date » · « Thread »
Top « Date » · « Thread »
From Matus UHLAR - fantomas <uh...@fantomas.sk>
Subject Re: Training Bayes with BAYES_999 Mail
Date Fri, 02 Oct 2015 17:57:07 GMT
On 02.10.15 13:15, Andrew Davidson wrote:
>I'm not an expert on the mechanics of Bayes so I'm wondering how
>valuable it is to continue training with collected spam that is
>properly tagged with BAYES_999.
>
>Does that help to reinforce the logic or is it overly focusing the
>database on emails it can already detect? Should I only be training it
>with miscategorized emails and emails in the 20-80% confidence range?

imho, the more uncertain BAYES score is, the more it's usefull to train.
something hitting BAYES_999 is not worth imho.
-- 
Matus UHLAR - fantomas, uhlar@fantomas.sk ; http://www.fantomas.sk/
Warning: I wish NOT to receive e-mail advertising to this address.
Varovanie: na tuto adresu chcem NEDOSTAVAT akukolvek reklamnu postu.
"The box said 'Requires Windows 95 or better', so I bought a Macintosh".

Mime
View raw message