spamassassin-users mailing list archives

Site index · List index
Message view « Date » · « Thread »
Top « Date » · « Thread »
From Charles Sprickman <sp...@bway.net>
Subject Re: Verify Bayes is functioning
Date Tue, 30 Jun 2015 04:40:07 GMT
Reindl Harald <h.reindl@thelounge.net> wrote:

> 
> Am 29.06.2015 um 01:14 schrieb Charles Sprickman:
>> If I run sa-learn and ask it to dump some info, that works:
>> 
>> [root@spam-b /usr/local/etc/mail/spamassassin]# sa-learn --username=spork@bway.net
--dump magic
>> 0.000          0          3          0  non-token data: bayes db version
>> 0.000          0          7          0  non-token data: nspam
>> 0.000          0        243          0  non-token data: nham
>> 0.000          0      56976          0  non-token data: ntokens
>> 0.000          0 1435355510          0  non-token data: oldest atime
>> 0.000          0 1435529521          0  non-token data: newest atime
>> 0.000          0          0          0  non-token data: last journal sync atime
>> 0.000          0          0          0  non-token data: last expiry atime
>> 0.000          0          0          0  non-token data: last expire atime delta
>> 0.000          0          0          0  non-token data: last expire reduction count
>> 
>> But I never see any bayes rule hits in the headers of my emails
> 
> it can't with just 7 spam samples

Oh my.

So apparently my pre-spamassassin filtering is keeping all the best spam
away from spamassassin.

My autolearn threshold is set to 12 for spam. I’ll take it down a few
notches, feed in some spam from elsewhere, and see what happens.

Thanks for the pointer, it simply didn’t occur to me that it’s not going to
do anything without a large enough spam/ham sample size.

Charles

Mime
View raw message