spamassassin-users mailing list archives

Site index · List index
Message view « Date » · « Thread »
Top « Date » · « Thread »
From Axb <axb.li...@gmail.com>
Subject Re: Handling very large messages (was Re: Which milter do you prefer?)
Date Sun, 15 Mar 2015 18:15:12 GMT
On 03/15/2015 07:09 PM, Reindl Harald wrote:
>
> Am 15.03.2015 um 19:03 schrieb Axb:
>> On 03/15/2015 06:49 PM, Robert Schetterer wrote:
>>> Am 15.03.2015 um 18:32 schrieb Robert Schetterer:
>>>> tagging is allowed, rejecting is nice but not a must have
>>>
>>> if you like reject try working in milter chaining with
>>> milter-manager http://milter-manager.sourceforge.net/ ( stats included )
>>> this gives you option for complex filter scenarios with div milters
>>> for size perhaps test combine with milter
>>> milter-size
>>> http://www.safe-mbox.com/~rgooch/email/index.html
>>> and many other milter stuff i.e
>>> https://www.milter.org/milter/98
>>> MSH Attach Filter
>>>
>>> not easy to do but should be extrem powerfull and flexible
>>> so on topic you dont need to choose a "prefered milter", just chain and
>>> combine all milters you like
>>
>> which makes much more sense thatn bending SA to do stuff it's not
>> designed to.
>>
>> IMO, deciding what chunk of a msg should be scanned should be managed by
>> the glue and not by SA.
>
> true but if the glue (spamass-milter) would truncate the message it
> passes to spamc it would get back that truncated message with the added
> headers (which are used to decide reject or pass) and so finally
> *deliver* the truncated version

then spamass-milter is the wrong choice.






Mime
View raw message