spamassassin-users mailing list archives

Site index · List index
Message view « Date » · « Thread »
Top « Date » · « Thread »
From Reindl Harald <h.rei...@thelounge.net>
Subject Re: crm114 usage
Date Mon, 09 Mar 2015 22:08:02 GMT


Am 09.03.2015 um 22:57 schrieb Quanah Gibson-Mount:
> --On Monday, March 09, 2015 11:04 PM +0100 Axb <axb.lists@gmail.com> wrote:
>
>> On 03/09/2015 08:00 PM, Quanah Gibson-Mount wrote:
>>> Is anyone using crm114 still these days for scoring with in
>>> SpamAssassin?
>>>
>>> If so, does it seem to be an additional effective tool in helping to
>>> classify and score spam/ham?
>>
>> I used to use it with MailScanner about in the late 2000s but but as I
>> couldn't find an efficient way to use it in a farm, I dropped it.
>> Back then it seemed very complicated.
>>
>> There was a SA plugin for SA 3.x
>> (http://mschuette.name/wp/crm114-spamassassin-plugin/)
>>
>> no idea if thats stufff is still mantained..
>
> Ok, thanks.  We suffer endless complaints about too much spam getting
> through SA, so I'm trying to find anything I can do to help improve
> scoring. ;)  I'll be pushing out SA-trunk (3.4.1 beta) fairly soon, with
> the DMARC rules that were posted here.  I'm hoping that helps
> significantly

start with disable bayes autolearning

while i don't use it and train manually i spent the last 3 days cleanup 
the hand-selected and re-viewed 15000 samples from the last 6 months 
from bayes-poisioning resulting in lower the token count by 20%


Mime
View raw message