Return-Path: X-Original-To: apmail-spamassassin-users-archive@www.apache.org Delivered-To: apmail-spamassassin-users-archive@www.apache.org Received: from mail.apache.org (hermes.apache.org [140.211.11.3]) by minotaur.apache.org (Postfix) with SMTP id 28DC011DA0 for ; Sat, 12 Jul 2014 17:41:54 +0000 (UTC) Received: (qmail 97039 invoked by uid 500); 12 Jul 2014 17:41:51 -0000 Delivered-To: apmail-spamassassin-users-archive@spamassassin.apache.org Received: (qmail 97011 invoked by uid 500); 12 Jul 2014 17:41:51 -0000 Mailing-List: contact users-help@spamassassin.apache.org; run by ezmlm Precedence: bulk list-help: list-unsubscribe: List-Post: List-Id: Delivered-To: mailing list users@spamassassin.apache.org Received: (qmail 97001 invoked by uid 99); 12 Jul 2014 17:41:50 -0000 Received: from nike.apache.org (HELO nike.apache.org) (192.87.106.230) by apache.org (qpsmtpd/0.29) with ESMTP; Sat, 12 Jul 2014 17:41:50 +0000 X-ASF-Spam-Status: No, hits=-0.7 required=10.0 tests=RCVD_IN_DNSWL_LOW,SPF_PASS X-Spam-Check-By: apache.org Received-SPF: pass (nike.apache.org: domain of axb.lists@gmail.com designates 74.125.82.43 as permitted sender) Received: from [74.125.82.43] (HELO mail-wg0-f43.google.com) (74.125.82.43) by apache.org (qpsmtpd/0.29) with ESMTP; Sat, 12 Jul 2014 17:41:46 +0000 Received: by mail-wg0-f43.google.com with SMTP id l18so1672155wgh.14 for ; Sat, 12 Jul 2014 10:41:22 -0700 (PDT) DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=gmail.com; s=20120113; h=message-id:date:from:user-agent:mime-version:to:subject:references :in-reply-to:content-type:content-transfer-encoding; bh=+TNuMEmJ4RBtTqGhG7WmkZgwTfrqqNKrvhlh9FJ1k+0=; b=Sfu3SKEUq2GBDiHNh8nnxFnhdtFsS2zNX/uLjmDz5ylMFL6lg5Mk+iu1Jol0x0eP7+ KcxzOaIG7JKE2Moa/0ZFGjoRjn8NBNOFZ0+HemfK0NC6wKtEkC/Qbs5hFnl6NjyAZbd1 qJSOB/Ds4il7ws4MWFHTyBKK3mYg7EalOdimauU9UfCWP+O33Qk6EuzEFaSrYObJUMxo BrM1OKQoA+kJyXa6NuPrn2CiWGZoWuusrqdmlFIXwuG2vHTGtjOvuC5/JP+T7L+eZeF7 gQm7rWGhmDAxoceIO0r+1pqaldwIXIqfOPnz74RmCX4nPV1zEwXqJNsakIyXkEcG9RaQ nxZw== X-Received: by 10.194.87.134 with SMTP id ay6mr7518300wjb.84.1405186882689; Sat, 12 Jul 2014 10:41:22 -0700 (PDT) Received: from [192.168.192.3] (62-2-216-82.static.cablecom.ch. [62.2.216.82]) by mx.google.com with ESMTPSA id lk5sm8940490wic.18.2014.07.12.10.41.21 for (version=TLSv1 cipher=ECDHE-RSA-RC4-SHA bits=128/128); Sat, 12 Jul 2014 10:41:22 -0700 (PDT) Message-ID: <53C17340.4040708@gmail.com> Date: Sat, 12 Jul 2014 19:41:20 +0200 From: Axb User-Agent: Mozilla/5.0 (X11; Linux x86_64; rv:24.0) Gecko/20100101 Thunderbird/24.6.0 MIME-Version: 1.0 To: users@spamassassin.apache.org Subject: Re: Why isn't BAYES_99 + BAYES_999 trusted? References: <53C171CE.2000604@gmail.com> In-Reply-To: <53C171CE.2000604@gmail.com> Content-Type: text/plain; charset=ISO-8859-1; format=flowed Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit X-Virus-Checked: Checked by ClamAV on apache.org On 07/12/2014 07:35 PM, Steve Bergman wrote: > Is there some reason that the BAYES_99 + BAYES_999 score does not add up > to 5.0? per default, no "single* SA rule should tag a msg as spam. > I'm trying to "trust the defaults". But what would be the hazards of > leaving BAYES_99 at 3.5 and upping BAYES_999 to 1.5? It seems that I > should be able to trust Bayes to declare a message spam on its own. if you can't imagine the "hazards" you better not do it ;-)