spamassassin-users mailing list archives

Site index · List index
Message view « Date » · « Thread »
Top « Date » · « Thread »
From Axb <>
Subject Re: Why isn't BAYES_99 + BAYES_999 trusted?
Date Sat, 12 Jul 2014 17:41:20 GMT
On 07/12/2014 07:35 PM, Steve Bergman wrote:
> Is there some reason that the BAYES_99 + BAYES_999 score does not add up
> to 5.0?

per default, no "single* SA rule should tag a msg as spam.

> I'm trying to "trust the defaults". But what would be the hazards of
> leaving BAYES_99 at 3.5 and upping BAYES_999 to 1.5? It seems that I
> should be able to trust Bayes to declare a message spam on its own.

if you can't imagine the "hazards" you better not do it ;-)

View raw message