spamassassin-users mailing list archives

Site index · List index
Message view « Date » · « Thread »
Top « Date » · « Thread »
From David Jones <>
Subject RE: Domain ages (was Re: SPAM from a registrar)
Date Mon, 09 Jun 2014 19:31:23 GMT
If SEM was able to detect newly registered domains more quickly then that would solve the problem.
From: John Hardin <>
Sent: Monday, June 09, 2014 2:24 PM
Subject: Re: Domain ages (was Re: SPAM from a registrar)

On Mon, 9 Jun 2014, David F. Skoll wrote:

> On Mon, 9 Jun 2014 11:51:21 -0700 (PDT)
> John Hardin <> wrote:
>>> So there is merit in building a distributed look-up system using SA.
>> Distributed lookup of *what*, though? Can you clarify that part of
>> your idea? Are you referring to distributed whois queries for a
>> domain name, to determine its age?
> The clever part is that once lots of sites begin using this in their
> SA setups, we'll very quickly build up quite an accurate database of
> newly-seen domains that's completely independent of any registrar for
> a data source.

Ah, ok, that's where I was confused. The proposal is for a distributed
network gathering newly-SEEN domain names, rather than newly-REGISTERED
domain names.

Thanks for the clarification. I was focusing on the latter.

  John Hardin KA7OHZ              FALaholic #11174     pgpk -a
  key: 0xB8732E79 -- 2D8C 34F4 6411 F507 136C  AF76 D822 E6E6 B873 2E79
   You can't reason a person out of a position if he didn't use
   reason to get there in the first place.   -- Kristopher, at Marko's
  739 days since the first successful private support mission to ISS (SpaceX)

View raw message