Return-Path: 
 <users-return-102602-apmail-spamassassin-users-archive=spamassassin.apache.org@spamassassin.apache.org>
X-Original-To: apmail-spamassassin-users-archive@www.apache.org
Delivered-To: apmail-spamassassin-users-archive@www.apache.org
Received: from mail.apache.org (hermes.apache.org [140.211.11.3])
	by minotaur.apache.org (Postfix) with SMTP id 2821810893
	for <apmail-spamassassin-users-archive@www.apache.org>;
 Mon, 17 Feb 2014 14:54:47 +0000 (UTC)
Received: (qmail 12563 invoked by uid 500); 17 Feb 2014 14:54:44 -0000
Delivered-To: apmail-spamassassin-users-archive@spamassassin.apache.org
Received: (qmail 11307 invoked by uid 500); 17 Feb 2014 14:54:40 -0000
Mailing-List: contact users-help@spamassassin.apache.org; run by ezmlm
Precedence: bulk
list-help: <mailto:users-help@spamassassin.apache.org>
list-unsubscribe: <mailto:users-unsubscribe@spamassassin.apache.org>
List-Post: <mailto:users@spamassassin.apache.org>
List-Id: <users.spamassassin.apache.org>
Delivered-To: mailing list users@spamassassin.apache.org
Received: (qmail 11298 invoked by uid 99); 17 Feb 2014 14:54:39 -0000
Received: from nike.apache.org (HELO nike.apache.org) (192.87.106.230)
    by apache.org (qpsmtpd/0.29) with ESMTP; Mon, 17 Feb 2014 14:54:39 +0000
X-ASF-Spam-Status: No, hits=-0.7 required=10.0
	tests=RCVD_IN_DNSWL_LOW,SPF_PASS
X-Spam-Check-By: apache.org
Received-SPF: pass (nike.apache.org: domain of rwmaillists@googlemail.com
 designates 209.85.212.178 as permitted sender)
Received: from [209.85.212.178] (HELO mail-wi0-f178.google.com)
 (209.85.212.178)
    by apache.org (qpsmtpd/0.29) with ESMTP; Mon, 17 Feb 2014 14:54:33 +0000
Received: by mail-wi0-f178.google.com with SMTP id cc10so2478318wib.17
        for <users@spamassassin.apache.org>;
 Mon, 17 Feb 2014 06:54:13 -0800 (PST)
DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed;
        d=googlemail.com; s=20120113;
        h=date:from:to:subject:message-id:in-reply-to:references:mime-version
         :content-type:content-transfer-encoding;
        bh=qkKT57IlhEj5thTL+eR59cWn7r4g8KeMGDpn00v8LSc=;
        b=Uu1ZEidbv0pvxt0x7DGkZFkhhp4OQHPU/lUwjZejdfM8CPMX8ZWIw9QyEH4MeREPby
         67H/aTxasEa0mBXsAeTf5T2Sncu8YKBKIa3znQv5Ar36sLG49GQWm0i+e4NS0N9O1UdU
         YA/8/DSxThA539RZbX6xY5gv/q+5Hm4AyD/J4JDpAcq30hsmytEFIOYe9656Ra1WVgjM
         A3L+XTbJMwBZSsBNvJ9FQY9WNXZIxiZZ8jinrBlp3AGJd4Ecc8iblztAJrIuLFNuHfPl
         suhAxNPcWQrNvWZiH8YPQF/YOSKDl9VNjyPeu6MRQIRyPlgnOLxpKCSDTwASINxUgcRY
         3hcg==
X-Received: by 10.181.13.112 with SMTP id ex16mr13397318wid.23.1392648853599;
        Mon, 17 Feb 2014 06:54:13 -0800 (PST)
Received: from gumby.homeunix.com (4e5670d1.skybroadband.com. [78.86.112.209])
        by mx.google.com with ESMTPSA id
 n3sm33031244wix.10.2014.02.17.06.54.12
        for <users@spamassassin.apache.org>
        (version=SSLv3 cipher=RC4-SHA bits=128/128);
        Mon, 17 Feb 2014 06:54:13 -0800 (PST)
Date: Mon, 17 Feb 2014 14:54:11 +0000
From: RW <rwmaillists@googlemail.com>
To: users@spamassassin.apache.org
Subject: Re: BAYES_999 of score 1.0 (default)
Message-ID: <20140217145411.69263f56@gumby.homeunix.com>
In-Reply-To: <5302181D.4070609@PCCC.com>
References: <20140217134341.GA16168@fantomas.sk>
	<5302181D.4070609@PCCC.com>
X-Mailer: Claws Mail 3.9.3 (GTK+ 2.24.22; amd64-portbld-freebsd10.0)
MIME-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: text/plain; charset=US-ASCII
Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit
X-Virus-Checked: Checked by ClamAV on apache.org

On Mon, 17 Feb 2014 09:09:33 -0500
Kevin A. McGrail wrote:

> On 2/17/2014 8:43 AM, Matus UHLAR - fantomas wrote:
> > Hello,
> >
> > seems after last rule update we've got new rule BAYES_99 in 
> > 72_scores.cf but
> > without score (and thus default 1.0) in 50_scores.cf.
> >
> > ... a mistake happened apparently?
> >
> I'll look and see.  I've never tried to promote a bayes rule so it
> might need to bypass sandbox.

I have spam that's already hitting BAYES_999 with the default 1.0 score.