spamassassin-users mailing list archives: April 2013

Site index · List index
Message listThread · Author · Date
Re: Interpreting an Authentication-Results: header ?
Shankar   Re: Interpreting an Authentication-Results: header ? Mon, 01 Apr, 04:59
Ralf Hildebrandt     Re: Interpreting an Authentication-Results: header ? Mon, 01 Apr, 16:26
Andreas Schulze   Re: Interpreting an Authentication-Results: header ? Mon, 01 Apr, 18:00
Benny Pedersen     Re: Interpreting an Authentication-Results: header ? Mon, 01 Apr, 21:56
Josef Karliak Spamassassin 3.3.2 and load problem od DL380G5 ? Wed, 03 Apr, 07:04
David B Funk   Re: Spamassassin 3.3.2 and load problem od DL380G5 ? Wed, 03 Apr, 07:45
Dirk Bonengel     Re: Spamassassin 3.3.2 and load problem od DL380G5 ? Wed, 03 Apr, 08:58
Josef Karliak       Re: Spamassassin 3.3.2 and load problem od DL380G5 ? Wed, 03 Apr, 13:36
Matus UHLAR - fantomas         Re: Spamassassin 3.3.2 and load problem od DL380G5 ? Wed, 03 Apr, 13:53
Benny Pedersen           Re: Spamassassin 3.3.2 and load problem od DL380G5 ? Wed, 03 Apr, 22:15
Matus UHLAR - fantomas       Re: Spamassassin 3.3.2 and load problem od DL380G5 ? Wed, 03 Apr, 13:50
Dirk Bonengel         Re: Spamassassin 3.3.2 and load problem od DL380G5 ? Thu, 04 Apr, 09:32
Matus UHLAR - fantomas           Re: Spamassassin 3.3.2 and load problem od DL380G5 ? Thu, 04 Apr, 10:52
Josef Karliak           Re: Spamassassin 3.3.2 and load problem od DL380G5 ? Thu, 04 Apr, 11:03
Matus UHLAR - fantomas             Re: Spamassassin 3.3.2 and load problem od DL380G5 ? Thu, 04 Apr, 11:32
Josef Karliak               Re: Spamassassin 3.3.2 and load problem od DL380G5 ? Thu, 04 Apr, 12:09
Matus UHLAR - fantomas                 Re: Spamassassin 3.3.2 and load problem od DL380G5 ? Thu, 04 Apr, 14:04
nightduke                   Re: Spamassassin 3.3.2 and load problem od DL380G5 ? Thu, 04 Apr, 15:29
Josef Karliak                     Re: Spamassassin 3.3.2 and load problem od DL380G5 ? Fri, 05 Apr, 07:19
Josef Karliak                   Re: Spamassassin 3.3.2 and load problem od DL380G5 ? Fri, 05 Apr, 07:38
Axb                     Re: Spamassassin 3.3.2 and load problem od DL380G5 ? Fri, 05 Apr, 07:46
Matus UHLAR - fantomas                     Re: Spamassassin 3.3.2 and load problem od DL380G5 ? Fri, 05 Apr, 17:31
Axb   Re: Spamassassin 3.3.2 and load problem od DL380G5 ? Wed, 03 Apr, 22:23
Josef Karliak     Re: Spamassassin 3.3.2 and load problem od DL380G5 ? Thu, 04 Apr, 04:45
Henrik K   Re: Spamassassin 3.3.2 and load problem od DL380G5 ? Thu, 04 Apr, 05:05
Josef Karliak     Re: Spamassassin 3.3.2 and load problem od DL380G5 ? Thu, 04 Apr, 06:04
Matus UHLAR - fantomas       Re: Spamassassin 3.3.2 and load problem od DL380G5 ? Thu, 04 Apr, 10:54
Thomas Cameron Verifying .procmailrc settings to delete high scoring spam messages Mon, 08 Apr, 03:12
Bob Proulx   Re: Verifying .procmailrc settings to delete high scoring spam messages Mon, 08 Apr, 03:44
Thomas Cameron     Re: Verifying .procmailrc settings to delete high scoring spam messages Mon, 08 Apr, 03:55
Karsten Bräckelmann     Re: Verifying .procmailrc settings to delete high scoring spam messages Mon, 08 Apr, 20:51
Bob Proulx       Re: Verifying .procmailrc settings to delete high scoring spam messages Mon, 08 Apr, 22:02
David F. Skoll         Much better procmail alternative (was Re: Verifying .procmailrc settings to delete high scoring spam messages) Mon, 08 Apr, 23:41
Martin Gregorie           Re: Much better procmail alternative (was Re: Verifying .procmailrc settings to delete high scoring spam messages) Tue, 09 Apr, 10:29
Lucio Chiappetti     Re: Verifying .procmailrc settings to delete high scoring spam messages Tue, 09 Apr, 11:36
Andrzej A. Filip   Dev-nulling is a bad idea [Was: Verifying .procmailrc settings to delete high scoring spam messages] Mon, 08 Apr, 08:52
Walter Hurry     Re: Dev-nulling is a bad idea [Was: Verifying .procmailrc settings to delete high scoring spam messages] Mon, 08 Apr, 17:06
Bowie Bailey       Re: Dev-nulling is a bad idea [Was: Verifying .procmailrc settings to delete high scoring spam messages] Mon, 08 Apr, 17:12
Ian Turner       Re: Dev-nulling is a bad idea [Was: Verifying .procmailrc settings to delete high scoring spam messages] Tue, 09 Apr, 00:51
Thomas Cameron     Re: Dev-nulling is a bad idea [Was: Verifying .procmailrc settings to delete high scoring spam messages] Mon, 22 Apr, 13:27
Matus UHLAR - fantomas       Re: Dev-nulling is a bad idea [Was: Verifying .procmailrc settings to delete high scoring spam messages] Mon, 22 Apr, 14:03
Thomas Cameron         Re: Dev-nulling is a bad idea [Was: Verifying .procmailrc settings to delete high scoring spam messages] Mon, 22 Apr, 19:50
Andrzej A. Filip       Re: Dev-nulling is a bad idea [Was: Verifying .procmailrc settings to delete high scoring spam messages] Mon, 22 Apr, 14:29
Benny Pedersen         Re: Dev-nulling is a bad idea [Was: Verifying .procmailrc settings to delete high scoring spam messages] Mon, 22 Apr, 14:42
Thomas Cameron         Re: Dev-nulling is a bad idea [Was: Verifying .procmailrc settings to delete high scoring spam messages] Mon, 22 Apr, 20:01
Matus UHLAR - fantomas           Re: Dev-nulling is a bad idea [Was: Verifying .procmailrc settings to delete high scoring spam messages] Tue, 23 Apr, 09:58
jdow       Re: Dev-nulling is a bad idea [Was: Verifying .procmailrc settings to delete high scoring spam messages] Mon, 22 Apr, 20:50
Per-Erik Persson master/slave sql backend for spamassassin Mon, 08 Apr, 12:32
Axb   Re: master/slave sql backend for spamassassin Mon, 08 Apr, 12:39
Alex     Re: master/slave sql backend for spamassassin Mon, 08 Apr, 15:21
Axb       Re: master/slave sql backend for spamassassin Mon, 08 Apr, 15:31
Alex         Re: master/slave sql backend for spamassassin Mon, 08 Apr, 23:38
Alex VBounce and backscatter Wed, 10 Apr, 02:38
Noel   Re: VBounce and backscatter Wed, 10 Apr, 04:40
Benny Pedersen   Re: VBounce and backscatter Wed, 10 Apr, 08:47
Re: Yahoo single link spam
Alex   Re: Yahoo single link spam Thu, 11 Apr, 00:42
Noel     Re: Yahoo single link spam Thu, 11 Apr, 01:40
Alex       Re: Yahoo single link spam Thu, 11 Apr, 02:00
Noel         Re: Yahoo single link spam Thu, 11 Apr, 02:43
Alex     Re: Yahoo single link spam Thu, 11 Apr, 22:25
Martin Gregorie       Re: Yahoo single link spam Thu, 11 Apr, 23:41
Alex URL spam and RP_MATCHES_RCVD Thu, 11 Apr, 22:56
Martin Gregorie   Re: URL spam and RP_MATCHES_RCVD Fri, 12 Apr, 00:09
Alex     Re: URL spam and RP_MATCHES_RCVD Fri, 12 Apr, 01:05
Matus UHLAR - fantomas   Re: URL spam and RP_MATCHES_RCVD Fri, 12 Apr, 07:44
Kris Deugau   Re: URL spam and RP_MATCHES_RCVD Fri, 12 Apr, 15:23
Niamh Holding     Re: URL spam and RP_MATCHES_RCVD Mon, 15 Apr, 17:46
Ned Slider       Re: URL spam and RP_MATCHES_RCVD Mon, 15 Apr, 18:30
Kris Deugau       Re: URL spam and RP_MATCHES_RCVD Mon, 15 Apr, 19:34
Alex         Re: URL spam and RP_MATCHES_RCVD Mon, 15 Apr, 23:07
Ned Slider           Re: URL spam and RP_MATCHES_RCVD Tue, 16 Apr, 13:28
Ned Slider             Subject: Fusemail Technical Support for Case - 03278437 ref:_00D301Siv._50060Ppgo5:ref – Re: URL spam and RP_MATCHES_RCVD Tue, 16 Apr, 13:49
Kris Deugau           Re: URL spam and RP_MATCHES_RCVD Tue, 16 Apr, 14:26
Alex             Re: URL spam and RP_MATCHES_RCVD Wed, 17 Apr, 23:07
RW               Re: URL spam and RP_MATCHES_RCVD Thu, 18 Apr, 13:22
Alex                 Re: URL spam and RP_MATCHES_RCVD Thu, 18 Apr, 18:25
Niamh Holding         Re: URL spam and RP_MATCHES_RCVD Thu, 18 Apr, 09:23
Niamh Holding     Re: URL spam and RP_MATCHES_RCVD Mon, 29 Apr, 15:09
Axel Werner unsubscribe Fri, 12 Apr, 07:40
Bob Proulx   Re: unsubscribe Fri, 12 Apr, 07:45
Catalin Constantin Check only last Received line Fri, 12 Apr, 07:51
Matus UHLAR - fantomas   Re: Check only last Received line Fri, 12 Apr, 08:04
Catalin Constantin     Re: Check only last Received line Fri, 12 Apr, 08:39
Matus UHLAR - fantomas       Re: Check only last Received line Fri, 12 Apr, 09:38
Matus UHLAR - fantomas         Re: Check only last Received line Fri, 12 Apr, 12:04
Frank Reppin       Re: Check only last Received line Fri, 12 Apr, 11:19
Matus UHLAR - fantomas         Re: Check only last Received line Fri, 12 Apr, 11:56
Benny Pedersen       Re: Check only last Received line Fri, 12 Apr, 11:33
Matus UHLAR - fantomas         Re: Check only last Received line Fri, 12 Apr, 11:57
Benny Pedersen           Re: Check only last Received line Fri, 12 Apr, 12:16
Matus UHLAR - fantomas             Re: Check only last Received line Fri, 12 Apr, 12:26
Benny Pedersen               Re: Check only last Received line Fri, 12 Apr, 12:32
Matus UHLAR - fantomas                 Re: Check only last Received line Fri, 12 Apr, 12:36
Benny Pedersen                   Re: Check only last Received line Fri, 12 Apr, 12:56
Matus UHLAR - fantomas                     Re: Check only last Received line Fri, 12 Apr, 18:35
haman...@t-online.de   Re: Check only last Received line Fri, 12 Apr, 17:36
Axb 20_sought_fraud.cf Fri, 12 Apr, 08:17
Benny Pedersen   Re: 20_sought_fraud.cf Fri, 12 Apr, 11:25
Justin Mason     Re: 20_sought_fraud.cf Fri, 12 Apr, 12:50
Axb       Re: 20_sought_fraud.cf Fri, 12 Apr, 12:53
John Hardin       Re: 20_sought_fraud.cf Fri, 12 Apr, 14:43
nelsonste...@hushmail.com Biggest Fake Conference in Computer Science Fri, 12 Apr, 17:24
Marc Perkel Need rule to catch lots of font changes Mon, 15 Apr, 00:46
Martin Gregorie   Re: Need rule to catch lots of font changes Mon, 15 Apr, 07:21
Martin Gregorie     Re: Need rule to catch lots of font changes Mon, 15 Apr, 07:51
Alexandre Boyer   Re: Need rule to catch lots of font changes Wed, 17 Apr, 16:02
Alex     Re: Need rule to catch lots of font changes Thu, 18 Apr, 23:32
Alexandre Boyer       Re: Need rule to catch lots of font changes Fri, 19 Apr, 16:06
Bowie Bailey       Re: Need rule to catch lots of font changes Fri, 19 Apr, 16:08
Alex         Re: Need rule to catch lots of font changes Fri, 19 Apr, 19:55
Re: Calling spamassassin directly yields very different results than calling spamassassin via amavis-new
Ben Johnson   Re: Calling spamassassin directly yields very different results than calling spamassassin via amavis-new Tue, 16 Apr, 19:59
Daniel McDonald   Re: Calling spamassassin directly yields very different results than calling spamassassin via amavis-new Tue, 16 Apr, 21:01
Ben Johnson     Re: Calling spamassassin directly yields very different results than calling spamassassin via amavis-new Wed, 17 Apr, 19:40
Kris Deugau       Re: Calling spamassassin directly yields very different results than calling spamassassin via amavis-new Wed, 17 Apr, 21:05
Ben Johnson         Re: Calling spamassassin directly yields very different results than calling spamassassin via amavis-new Wed, 17 Apr, 22:47
Ben Johnson           Re: Calling spamassassin directly yields very different results than calling spamassassin via amavis-new Thu, 18 Apr, 02:04
John Hardin             Re: Calling spamassassin directly yields very different results than calling spamassassin via amavis-new Thu, 18 Apr, 02:15
Ben Johnson               Re: Calling spamassassin directly yields very different results than calling spamassassin via amavis-new Thu, 18 Apr, 16:18
Axb                 Re: Calling spamassassin directly yields very different results than calling spamassassin via amavis-new Thu, 18 Apr, 16:26
Ben Johnson                   Re: Calling spamassassin directly yields very different results than calling spamassassin via amavis-new Thu, 18 Apr, 17:55
Alex                     Re: Calling spamassassin directly yields very different results than calling spamassassin via amavis-new Thu, 18 Apr, 18:21
Ben Johnson                 Re: Calling spamassassin directly yields very different results than calling spamassassin via amavis-new Fri, 19 Apr, 15:09
Alex                   Re: Calling spamassassin directly yields very different results than calling spamassassin via amavis-new Fri, 19 Apr, 15:36
Alex                     Re: Calling spamassassin directly yields very different results than calling spamassassin via amavis-new Fri, 19 Apr, 15:42
Ben Johnson                       Re: Calling spamassassin directly yields very different results than calling spamassassin via amavis-new Fri, 19 Apr, 16:02
Axb                         Re: Calling spamassassin directly yields very different results than calling spamassassin via amavis-new Fri, 19 Apr, 16:12
Ben Johnson                           Re: Calling spamassassin directly yields very different results than calling spamassassin via amavis-new Sat, 20 Apr, 02:40
Benny Pedersen                             Re: Calling spamassassin directly yields very different results than calling spamassassin via amavis-new Sat, 20 Apr, 19:08
Benny Pedersen                         Re: Calling spamassassin directly yields very different results than calling spamassassin via amavis-new Fri, 19 Apr, 17:54
Ben Johnson                           Re: Calling spamassassin directly yields very different results than calling spamassassin via amavis-new Sat, 20 Apr, 03:02
Ben Johnson                             Re: Calling spamassassin directly yields very different results than calling spamassassin via amavis-new Sat, 20 Apr, 03:08
Ben Johnson                               Re: Calling spamassassin directly yields very different results than calling spamassassin via amavis-new Sat, 20 Apr, 17:01
Benny Pedersen                                 Re: Calling spamassassin directly yields very different results than calling spamassassin via amavis-new Sat, 20 Apr, 19:36
Benny Pedersen                             Re: Calling spamassassin directly yields very different results than calling spamassassin via amavis-new Sat, 20 Apr, 19:20
Ben Johnson                               Re: Calling spamassassin directly yields very different results than calling spamassassin via amavis-new Mon, 22 Apr, 15:05
Benny Pedersen               Re: Calling spamassassin directly yields very different results than calling spamassassin via amavis-new Fri, 19 Apr, 17:41
Tom Hendrikx       Re: Calling spamassassin directly yields very different results than calling spamassassin via amavis-new Wed, 17 Apr, 21:39
Ben Johnson         Re: Calling spamassassin directly yields very different results than calling spamassassin via amavis-new Thu, 18 Apr, 03:16
Mark A. Olbert Custom Score Being Reset? Tue, 16 Apr, 22:15
John Horne Using sa-compile are local rules compiled? Wed, 17 Apr, 20:40
RW   Re: Using sa-compile are local rules compiled? Thu, 18 Apr, 13:08
John Horne     Re: Using sa-compile are local rules compiled? Sun, 21 Apr, 18:47
RW       Re: Using sa-compile are local rules compiled? Sun, 21 Apr, 21:08
Joe Acquisto-j4 local score ignored Thu, 18 Apr, 10:11
Axb   Re: local score ignored Thu, 18 Apr, 10:15
Joe Acquisto-j4     Re: local score ignored Thu, 18 Apr, 10:23
Axb       Re: local score ignored Thu, 18 Apr, 10:38
Joe Acquisto-j4         Re: local score ignored Thu, 18 Apr, 10:45
Jari Fredriksson           Re: local score ignored Thu, 18 Apr, 11:04
Matus UHLAR - fantomas           Re: local score ignored Thu, 18 Apr, 11:21
Joe Acquisto-j4             Re: local score ignored Fri, 19 Apr, 01:45
Dave Warren               Re: local score ignored Fri, 19 Apr, 03:35
John Hardin               Re: local score ignored Fri, 19 Apr, 04:06
Joe Acquisto-j4                 Re: local score ignored Fri, 19 Apr, 10:09
Matus UHLAR - fantomas                   Re: local score ignored Fri, 19 Apr, 10:35
Joe Acquisto-j4                     Re: local score ignored Fri, 19 Apr, 11:10
John Hardin                       Re: local score ignored Fri, 19 Apr, 14:41
Joe Acquisto-j4                         Re: local score ignored Fri, 19 Apr, 23:47
Matus UHLAR - fantomas                         Re: local score ignored Sat, 20 Apr, 11:20
Bowie Bailey                       Re: local score ignored Fri, 19 Apr, 16:11
Benny Pedersen                       Re: local score ignored Fri, 19 Apr, 17:33
Matus UHLAR - fantomas               Re: local score ignored Fri, 19 Apr, 10:29
Joe Acquisto-j4                 Re: local score ignored Fri, 19 Apr, 11:02
Niamh Holding                   Re: local score ignored Fri, 19 Apr, 11:09
Joe Acquisto-j4                     Re: local score ignored Fri, 19 Apr, 13:22
Matus UHLAR - fantomas                       Re: local score ignored Fri, 19 Apr, 13:55
Matus UHLAR - fantomas                   Re: local score ignored Fri, 19 Apr, 12:55
John Hardin                   Re: local score ignored Fri, 19 Apr, 14:38
John Traweek CCNA, Sec+ sa-exim Terse Rules Fri, 19 Apr, 00:24
Benny Pedersen   Re: sa-exim Terse Rules Fri, 19 Apr, 16:28
Karsten Bräckelmann   Reporting matched Rules and Scores (was: Re: sa-exim Terse Rules) Sat, 20 Apr, 02:39
Joe Acquisto-j4 bayes - large message Sat, 20 Apr, 00:26
Joe Acquisto-j4   Re: bayes - large message Sat, 20 Apr, 00:33
Joe Acquisto-j4     re-learning ? was - bayes - large message Sat, 20 Apr, 13:10
RW       Re: re-learning ? was - bayes - large message Sat, 20 Apr, 14:22
Matus UHLAR - fantomas       Re: re-learning ? was - bayes - large message Sat, 20 Apr, 14:38
Jeff Mincy       Re: re-learning ? was - bayes - large message Sat, 20 Apr, 14:38
Joe Acquisto-j4         Re: re-learning ? was - bayes - large message Sat, 20 Apr, 14:58
John Hardin           Re: re-learning ? was - bayes - large message Sat, 20 Apr, 18:00
Joe Acquisto-j4             Re: re-learning ? was - bayes - large message Sat, 20 Apr, 19:18
John Hardin               Re: re-learning ? was - bayes - large message Sat, 20 Apr, 21:54
Matus UHLAR - fantomas               Re: re-learning ? was - bayes - large message Sun, 21 Apr, 18:19
RW         Re: re-learning ? was - bayes - large message Sun, 21 Apr, 17:48
Joe Acquisto-j4 Re: re-learning ? was - bayes - large message Sun, 21 Apr, 11:56
Dave Funk   Re: re-learning ? was - bayes - large message Sun, 21 Apr, 20:31
Joe Acquisto-j4   Re: re-learning ? was - bayes - large message Sun, 21 Apr, 22:11
Frank Gadegast rule problem basing on X-Spam-ASN Wed, 24 Apr, 14:45
Benny Pedersen   Re: rule problem basing on X-Spam-ASN Wed, 24 Apr, 22:32
John Hardin     Re: rule problem basing on X-Spam-ASN Wed, 24 Apr, 22:42
Karsten Bräckelmann     Re: rule problem basing on X-Spam-ASN Wed, 24 Apr, 23:04
Karsten Bräckelmann       Re: rule problem basing on X-Spam-ASN Wed, 24 Apr, 23:16
Benny Pedersen       Re: rule problem basing on X-Spam-ASN Wed, 24 Apr, 23:38
Frank Gadegast       Re: rule problem basing on X-Spam-ASN - not a rule problem Thu, 25 Apr, 05:56
Christian Recktenwald         Re: rule problem basing on X-Spam-ASN - not a rule problem Thu, 25 Apr, 06:56
Frank Gadegast           Re: rule problem basing on X-Spam-ASN - not a rule problem Thu, 25 Apr, 08:18
Christian Recktenwald             Re: rule problem basing on X-Spam-ASN - not a rule problem Thu, 25 Apr, 09:11
Frank Gadegast               Re: rule problem basing on X-Spam-ASN - not a rule problem Thu, 25 Apr, 09:42
Dave Funk                 Re: rule problem basing on X-Spam-ASN - not a rule problem Thu, 25 Apr, 20:05
Benny Pedersen             Re: rule problem basing on X-Spam-ASN - not a rule problem Sat, 27 Apr, 01:47
Benny Pedersen           Re: rule problem basing on X-Spam-ASN - not a rule problem Sat, 27 Apr, 01:39
Frank Gadegast       Re: rule problem basing on X-Spam-ASN - not a rule problem - proof Thu, 25 Apr, 06:09
RW   Re: rule problem basing on X-Spam-ASN Thu, 25 Apr, 12:57
Karsten Bräckelmann     Re: rule problem basing on X-Spam-ASN Fri, 26 Apr, 00:03
RW       Re: rule problem basing on X-Spam-ASN Fri, 26 Apr, 00:36
Benny Pedersen       Re: rule problem basing on X-Spam-ASN Sat, 27 Apr, 01:57
Karsten Bräckelmann         Re: rule problem basing on X-Spam-ASN Sat, 27 Apr, 02:37
hospice admin Seminar Spam Wed, 24 Apr, 16:12
Axb   Re: Seminar Spam Wed, 24 Apr, 16:30
Martin Gregorie   Re: Seminar Spam Wed, 24 Apr, 16:56
Ben Johnson   Re: Seminar Spam Wed, 24 Apr, 17:13
hospice admin   RE: Seminar Spam Tue, 30 Apr, 17:05
Andrew Talbot More longer rules or fewer shorter ones? Wed, 24 Apr, 16:32
John Hardin   Re: More longer rules or fewer shorter ones? Wed, 24 Apr, 16:57
Andrew Talbot     RE: More longer rules or fewer shorter ones? Wed, 24 Apr, 17:31
John Hardin       RE: More longer rules or fewer shorter ones? Wed, 24 Apr, 17:53
Andrew Talbot         RE: More longer rules or fewer shorter ones? Wed, 24 Apr, 18:16
John Hardin           RE: More longer rules or fewer shorter ones? Wed, 24 Apr, 20:05
Axb           Re: More longer rules or fewer shorter ones? Wed, 24 Apr, 20:23
Martin Gregorie   Re: More longer rules or fewer shorter ones? Wed, 24 Apr, 19:02
Andrew Talbot     Re: More longer rules or fewer shorter ones? Thu, 25 Apr, 22:45
John Hardin       Re: More longer rules or fewer shorter ones? Thu, 25 Apr, 23:28
Martin Gregorie       Re: More longer rules or fewer shorter ones? Fri, 26 Apr, 00:08
Andrew Talbot         RE: More longer rules or fewer shorter ones? Fri, 26 Apr, 20:04
Martin Gregorie           Re: More longer rules or fewer shorter ones? Sat, 27 Apr, 00:06
John Hardin             Re: More longer rules or fewer shorter ones? Sat, 27 Apr, 00:44
Martin Gregorie               Re: More longer rules or fewer shorter ones? Sat, 27 Apr, 01:00
psychobyte SQL error: Duplicate entry Wed, 24 Apr, 18:42
Ben Johnson   Re: SQL error: Duplicate entry Wed, 24 Apr, 21:09
psychobyte     Re: SQL error: Duplicate entry Thu, 25 Apr, 00:01
Matus UHLAR - fantomas       Re: SQL error: Duplicate entry Thu, 25 Apr, 11:47
Matthias Leisi         Re: SQL error: Duplicate entry Thu, 25 Apr, 14:36
Matus UHLAR - fantomas           Re: SQL error: Duplicate entry Thu, 25 Apr, 15:55
Ben Johnson             Re: SQL error: Duplicate entry Thu, 25 Apr, 18:16
Giampaolo Tomassoni               RE: SQL error: Duplicate entry Thu, 25 Apr, 20:28
psychobyte               Re: SQL error: Duplicate entry Fri, 26 Apr, 18:13
Blason rock PreRBL with spamassasdon Thu, 25 Apr, 19:09
Raymond Dijkxhoorn   Re: PreRBL with spamassasdon Thu, 25 Apr, 19:15
Blason rock     Re: PreRBL with spamassasdon Thu, 25 Apr, 19:20
Raymond Dijkxhoorn       Re: PreRBL with spamassasdon Thu, 25 Apr, 19:25
Tony Nelson         RE: PreRBL with spamassasdon Thu, 25 Apr, 19:31
Blason rock           RE: PreRBL with spamassasdon Thu, 25 Apr, 19:40
Karsten Bräckelmann             RE: PreRBL with spamassasdon Thu, 25 Apr, 21:19
Quanah Gibson-Mount               RE: PreRBL with spamassasdon Thu, 25 Apr, 22:02
Benny Pedersen               RE: PreRBL with spamassasdon Sat, 27 Apr, 01:31
Blason rock                 RE: PreRBL with spamassasdon Sat, 27 Apr, 04:20
Matus UHLAR - fantomas                   Re: PreRBL with spamassasdon Sat, 27 Apr, 12:30
Benny Pedersen             RE: PreRBL with spamassasdon Sat, 27 Apr, 01:28
Benny Pedersen   Re: PreRBL with spamassasdon Sat, 27 Apr, 01:16
Axb .pw / Palau URL domains in spam Fri, 26 Apr, 15:56
Axb   Re: .pw / Palau URL domains in spam Fri, 26 Apr, 16:01
Jason Haar     Re: .pw / Palau URL domains in spam Tue, 30 Apr, 00:37
John Levine   Re: .pw / Palau URL domains in spam Tue, 30 Apr, 01:17
Joe Acquisto-j4 BAYES question Fri, 26 Apr, 23:38
John Hardin   Re: BAYES question Fri, 26 Apr, 23:50
Joe Acquisto-j4     Re: BAYES question Sat, 27 Apr, 01:25
Karsten Bräckelmann       Re: BAYES question Sat, 27 Apr, 01:54
Jari Fredriksson         Re: BAYES question Sat, 27 Apr, 08:59
Axb           Re: BAYES question Sat, 27 Apr, 09:03
Jari Fredriksson             Re: BAYES question Sat, 27 Apr, 10:09
Benny Pedersen           Re: BAYES question Sat, 27 Apr, 15:24
Jari Fredriksson             Re: BAYES question Sat, 27 Apr, 17:02
Karsten Bräckelmann           Re: BAYES question Sat, 27 Apr, 20:15
Jari Fredriksson             Re: BAYES question Sat, 27 Apr, 22:15
John Hardin       Re: BAYES question Sat, 27 Apr, 17:20
Joe Acquisto-j4         Re: BAYES question Sat, 27 Apr, 22:55
Niamh Holding     Re: BAYES question Sat, 27 Apr, 16:25
Benny Pedersen       Re: BAYES question Sat, 27 Apr, 16:30
John Hardin       Re: BAYES question Sat, 27 Apr, 18:23
Alex     Re: BAYES question Sat, 27 Apr, 22:27
John Hardin       Re: BAYES question Sun, 28 Apr, 00:12
Karsten Bräckelmann   Re: BAYES question Sat, 27 Apr, 02:26
Joe Acquisto-j4     Re: BAYES question Sat, 27 Apr, 11:37
Matus UHLAR - fantomas       Re: BAYES question Sat, 27 Apr, 12:28
Benny Pedersen       Re: BAYES question Sat, 27 Apr, 15:17
Joe Acquisto-j4         Re: BAYES question Sat, 27 Apr, 23:00
John Hardin           Re: BAYES question Sun, 28 Apr, 00:13
Karsten Bräckelmann           Re: BAYES question Sun, 28 Apr, 00:38
Matus UHLAR - fantomas           Re: BAYES question Sun, 28 Apr, 11:15
Benny Pedersen   Re: BAYES question Sat, 27 Apr, 15:13
Alex RabinKarpAccel and v3.4 Sat, 27 Apr, 04:09
Benny Pedersen   Re: RabinKarpAccel and v3.4 Sat, 27 Apr, 04:44
Axb   Re: RabinKarpAccel and v3.4 Sat, 27 Apr, 07:06
Alex     Re: RabinKarpAccel and v3.4 Sat, 27 Apr, 14:43
Alex       Re: RabinKarpAccel and v3.4 Sat, 27 Apr, 14:49
Benny Pedersen     Re: RabinKarpAccel and v3.4 Sat, 27 Apr, 14:56
Alain Kelder RP rules helping spam get through Sat, 27 Apr, 11:26
Giampaolo Tomassoni   RE: RP rules helping spam get through Sat, 27 Apr, 12:01
Matus UHLAR - fantomas   Re: RP rules helping spam get through Sat, 27 Apr, 12:33
Benny Pedersen   Re: RP rules helping spam get through Sat, 27 Apr, 15:02
Greg Troxel   Re: RP rules helping spam get through Sun, 28 Apr, 00:48
Karsten Bräckelmann     Re: RP rules helping spam get through Sun, 28 Apr, 01:11
Margot Romary   Re: RP rules helping spam get through Tue, 30 Apr, 04:00
Margot Romary     Re: RP rules helping spam get through Tue, 30 Apr, 04:13
Rick Cone sa-lean Sun, 28 Apr, 16:31
Matus UHLAR - fantomas   Re: sa-lean Mon, 29 Apr, 07:10
Matus UHLAR - fantomas     Re: sa-lean Mon, 29 Apr, 08:23
Rick Cone       RE: sa-lean Mon, 29 Apr, 16:14
Matus UHLAR - fantomas         Re: sa-lean Mon, 29 Apr, 18:05
Rick Cone           RE: sa-lean Tue, 30 Apr, 00:07
Matus UHLAR - fantomas             Re: sa-lean Tue, 30 Apr, 07:08
Blason rock Filter against newsletters Mon, 29 Apr, 02:16
Martin Gregorie   Re: Filter against newsletters Mon, 29 Apr, 10:58
Matus UHLAR - fantomas     Re: Filter against newsletters Mon, 29 Apr, 11:06
Martin Gregorie       Re: Filter against newsletters Mon, 29 Apr, 11:42
John Hardin       Re: Filter against newsletters Mon, 29 Apr, 13:57
Alex         Re: Filter against newsletters Mon, 29 Apr, 16:46
John Hardin           Re: Filter against newsletters Mon, 29 Apr, 17:21
Martin Gregorie           Re: Filter against newsletters Mon, 29 Apr, 17:51
Message listThread · Author · Date
Box list
Aug 2016341
Jul 2016220
Jun 2016437
May 2016330
Apr 2016202
Mar 2016310
Feb 2016263
Jan 2016258
Dec 2015383
Nov 2015278
Oct 2015312
Sep 2015366
Aug 2015162
Jul 2015257
Jun 2015380
May 2015215
Apr 2015317
Mar 2015491
Feb 2015461
Jan 2015286
Dec 2014308
Nov 2014547
Oct 2014643
Sep 2014513
Aug 2014577
Jul 2014540
Jun 2014383
May 2014273
Apr 2014213
Mar 2014144
Feb 2014316
Jan 2014211
Dec 2013105
Nov 2013240
Oct 2013331
Sep 2013222
Aug 2013290
Jul 2013236
Jun 2013335
May 2013320
Apr 2013308
Mar 2013241
Feb 2013284
Jan 2013163
Dec 2012185
Nov 2012231
Oct 2012283
Sep 2012183
Aug 2012231
Jul 2012117
Jun 2012210
May 2012113
Apr 2012215
Mar 2012416
Feb 2012300
Jan 2012178
Dec 2011328
Nov 2011421
Oct 2011493
Sep 2011173
Aug 2011292
Jul 2011366
Jun 2011380
May 2011232
Apr 2011310
Mar 2011519
Feb 2011323
Jan 2011366
Dec 2010467
Nov 2010349
Oct 2010403
Sep 2010375
Aug 2010452
Jul 2010417
Jun 2010484
May 2010348
Apr 2010663
Mar 2010872
Feb 2010779
Jan 2010904
Dec 2009800
Nov 2009569
Oct 20091015
Sep 2009743
Aug 2009814
Jul 20091312
Jun 20091048
May 20091220
Apr 2009840
Mar 2009857
Feb 2009635
Jan 2009698
Dec 2008758
Nov 2008549
Oct 2008741
Sep 2008782
Aug 2008539
Jul 2008675
Jun 2008875
May 2008733
Apr 2008815
Mar 2008963
Feb 20081006
Jan 2008735
Dec 2007445
Nov 2007491
Oct 2007751
Sep 2007739
Aug 20071604
Jul 20071566
Jun 20071243
May 20071156
Apr 2007790
Mar 20071076
Feb 20071252
Jan 20071284
Dec 20061679
Nov 20062061
Oct 20062019
Sep 20061123
Aug 20062057
Jul 20061152
Jun 20061315
May 20061294
Apr 20061039
Mar 20061321
Feb 20061434
Jan 20061005
Dec 20051182
Nov 2005997
Oct 2005821
Sep 20051152
Aug 20051027
Jul 20051239
Jun 20051267
May 20051795
Apr 2005956
Mar 20051283
Feb 20051205
Jan 20051400
Dec 20041379
Nov 20041323
Oct 20041702
Sep 20041983
Aug 20041472
Jul 20041844
Jun 20042022
May 20041974
Apr 20042478
Mar 20042830
Feb 20042380
Jan 200426