Return-Path: X-Original-To: apmail-spamassassin-users-archive@www.apache.org Delivered-To: apmail-spamassassin-users-archive@www.apache.org Received: from mail.apache.org (hermes.apache.org [140.211.11.3]) by minotaur.apache.org (Postfix) with SMTP id 12F4BEE67 for ; Thu, 7 Mar 2013 12:01:43 +0000 (UTC) Received: (qmail 92618 invoked by uid 500); 7 Mar 2013 12:01:40 -0000 Delivered-To: apmail-spamassassin-users-archive@spamassassin.apache.org Received: (qmail 92477 invoked by uid 500); 7 Mar 2013 12:01:40 -0000 Mailing-List: contact users-help@spamassassin.apache.org; run by ezmlm Precedence: bulk list-help: list-unsubscribe: List-Post: List-Id: Delivered-To: mailing list users@spamassassin.apache.org Received: (qmail 92450 invoked by uid 99); 7 Mar 2013 12:01:39 -0000 Received: from nike.apache.org (HELO nike.apache.org) (192.87.106.230) by apache.org (qpsmtpd/0.29) with ESMTP; Thu, 07 Mar 2013 12:01:39 +0000 X-ASF-Spam-Status: No, hits=-2.3 required=10.0 tests=RCVD_IN_DNSWL_MED,SPF_PASS X-Spam-Check-By: apache.org Received-SPF: pass (nike.apache.org: domain of dfs@roaringpenguin.com designates 70.38.112.54 as permitted sender) Received: from [70.38.112.54] (HELO colo3.roaringpenguin.com) (70.38.112.54) by apache.org (qpsmtpd/0.29) with ESMTP; Thu, 07 Mar 2013 12:01:34 +0000 Received: from vanadium.roaringpenguin.com ([192.168.10.23]) by colo3.roaringpenguin.com (8.14.3/8.14.3/Debian-9.4) with ESMTP id r27C1CXx021416 for ; Thu, 7 Mar 2013 07:01:12 -0500 Received: from shishi.roaringpenguin.com (dfs@shishi.roaringpenguin.com [192.168.2.3]) by vanadium.roaringpenguin.com (8.14.3/8.14.3/Debian-9.4) with ESMTP id r27C19C4000946 (version=TLSv1/SSLv3 cipher=DHE-RSA-AES128-SHA bits=128 verify=NOT) for ; Thu, 7 Mar 2013 07:01:11 -0500 Date: Thu, 7 Mar 2013 07:01:08 -0500 From: "David F. Skoll" To: users@spamassassin.apache.org Subject: fork is vfork? (was Re: "With similar rules, rspamd is about ten times faster than SpamAssassin.") Message-ID: <20130307070108.6f8ca8f7@shishi.roaringpenguin.com> In-Reply-To: <006301ce1b09$6a5034e0$3ef09ea0$@biz> References: <20130306210932.GV26133@chaosreigns.com> <006301ce1b09$6a5034e0$3ef09ea0$@biz> Organization: Roaring Penguin Software Inc. X-Mailer: Claws Mail 3.7.6 (GTK+ 2.20.1; x86_64-pc-linux-gnu) Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=US-ASCII Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha1; c=relaxed; d=roaringpenguin.com; h=date :from:to:subject:message-id:in-reply-to:references:mime-version :content-type:content-transfer-encoding; s=main; bh=buRJZyJcoby0 bl3e4sAbhlxCW0o=; b=mZjGUbX2ijYxYDe5ci0ehhnKakGePdfyZ+zNzximQ+1f iNNjILKuZEYVHO9CP6Ti8bO9aC4+aTafh+vYfhgUZrGnCLT47Q/dJcIbPpZOeAru TBX2lbTr2ES4fCc7LRMmnD3YBhBBS3p8nKu1rKMsltCT+IkaG2os9mTkK2pndeAg BP1ol/TgGCCi1ybm7q+XtS/swRXVGFHol69NCr/xjD1fYLEUjPgppi/mJpTTy25K 1NjfaHdrG5kGO3deUN8Y2+6q2hm+V4qenyzlvB3GgB+Hg5XLoGLKayTCE1yGpdkt FirORaIvTrjcS3i5TiXwZJEWTs09tzTtRHX+faiX/g== X-Scanned-By: CanIt (www . roaringpenguin . com) X-Scanned-By: MIMEDefang 2.73 on 192.168.10.23 X-Spam-Score: undef - relay 192.168.10.23 marked with skip_spam_scan X-CanIt-Geo: No geolocation information available for 192.168.10.23 X-CanItPRO-Stream: outgoing (inherits from default) X-CanIt-Archive-Cluster: SQVyZJxqklY5buiWXYCN4T/BjiM X-CanIt-Archived-As: base/20130307 / 01J8A1cSy X-Virus-Checked: Checked by ClamAV on apache.org On Thu, 7 Mar 2013 08:57:28 +0100 "Giampaolo Tomassoni" wrote: > I don't see too many differences with running more SA > processes with linuxes (in which a fork() is actually a vfork()). I don't believe that's true. Do you have evidence to back up that claim? fork() and vfork() have very different semantics and vfork() would not work at all for spamd. Regards, David.