spamassassin-users mailing list archives

Site index · List index
Message view « Date » · « Thread »
Top « Date » · « Thread »
From Matus UHLAR - fantomas <uh...@fantomas.sk>
Subject Re: fork is vfork? (was Re: "With similar rules, rspamd is about ten times faster than SpamAssassin.")
Date Thu, 07 Mar 2013 12:47:55 GMT
>On Thu, 7 Mar 2013 08:57:28 +0100
>"Giampaolo Tomassoni" <Giampaolo@Tomassoni.biz> wrote:
>> I don't see too many differences with running more SA
>> processes with linuxes (in which a fork() is actually a vfork()).

On 07.03.13 07:01, David F. Skoll wrote:
>I don't believe that's true.  Do you have evidence to back up that claim?
>fork() and vfork() have very different semantics and vfork() would not
>work at all for spamd.

the implementation of fork() in linux makes it nearly the same as vfork().
-- 
Matus UHLAR - fantomas, uhlar@fantomas.sk ; http://www.fantomas.sk/
Warning: I wish NOT to receive e-mail advertising to this address.
Varovanie: na tuto adresu chcem NEDOSTAVAT akukolvek reklamnu postu.
WinError #99999: Out of error messages.

Mime
View raw message