spamassassin-users mailing list archives

Site index · List index
Message view « Date » · « Thread »
Top « Date » · « Thread »
From "David F. Skoll" <...@roaringpenguin.com>
Subject fork is vfork? (was Re: "With similar rules, rspamd is about ten times faster than SpamAssassin.")
Date Thu, 07 Mar 2013 12:01:08 GMT
On Thu, 7 Mar 2013 08:57:28 +0100
"Giampaolo Tomassoni" <Giampaolo@Tomassoni.biz> wrote:

> I don't see too many differences with running more SA
> processes with linuxes (in which a fork() is actually a vfork()).

I don't believe that's true.  Do you have evidence to back up that claim?
fork() and vfork() have very different semantics and vfork() would not
work at all for spamd.

Regards,

David.

Mime
View raw message