spamassassin-users mailing list archives: January 2013

Site index · List index
Message listThread · Author · Date
Re: Request for wiki access
Kevin A. McGrail   Re: Request for wiki access Tue, 01 Jan, 01:14
Fabio Sangiovanni URIDNSBL: how to query certain lists only? Fri, 04 Jan, 10:48
Alexandre Boyer   Re: URIDNSBL: how to query certain lists only? Fri, 04 Jan, 13:22
Kris Deugau     Re: URIDNSBL: how to query certain lists only? Fri, 04 Jan, 14:38
Daniel McDonald   Re: URIDNSBL: how to query certain lists only? Fri, 04 Jan, 15:52
Kris Deugau     Re: URIDNSBL: how to query certain lists only? Fri, 04 Jan, 17:12
Fabio Sangiovanni       Re: URIDNSBL: how to query certain lists only? Mon, 07 Jan, 09:18
Alexandre Boyer         Re: URIDNSBL: how to query certain lists only? Mon, 07 Jan, 19:02
Jeremy Morton Is the SpamAssassin wiki dead? Sun, 06 Jan, 12:49
Jeremy McSpadden   Re: Is the SpamAssassin wiki dead? Sun, 06 Jan, 14:25
Jeremy Morton     Re: Is the SpamAssassin wiki dead? Mon, 07 Jan, 22:41
dar...@chaosreigns.com       Re: Is the SpamAssassin wiki dead? Mon, 07 Jan, 22:49
s.@yacc.co.uk Does anyone recognise this? Mon, 07 Jan, 17:04
Ned Slider FPs on AXB_XMAILER_MIMEOLE_OL_B054A Mon, 07 Jan, 17:29
Kris Deugau   Re: FPs on AXB_XMAILER_MIMEOLE_OL_B054A Tue, 08 Jan, 16:27
Kevin A. McGrail     Re: FPs on AXB_XMAILER_MIMEOLE_OL_B054A Tue, 08 Jan, 16:31
Ned Slider       Re: FPs on AXB_XMAILER_MIMEOLE_OL_B054A Tue, 08 Jan, 20:08
Ned Slider     Re: FPs on AXB_XMAILER_MIMEOLE_OL_B054A Tue, 08 Jan, 19:20
ANNOUNCEMENT: update to ivmURI regarding surge in rarely-blacklisted domains spammers use from legit site that are "compromised"
Rob McEwen   ANNOUNCEMENT: update to ivmURI regarding surge in rarely-blacklisted domains spammers use from legit site that are "compromised" Mon, 07 Jan, 18:15
dar...@chaosreigns.com     Re: ANNOUNCEMENT: update to ivmURI regarding surge in rarely-blacklisted domains spammers use from legit site that are "compromised" Mon, 07 Jan, 18:53
Rob McEwen       Re: ANNOUNCEMENT: update to ivmURI regarding surge in rarely-blacklisted domains spammers use from legit site that are "compromised" Mon, 07 Jan, 19:19
Re: HELO_DYNAMIC_IPADDR2 & HELO_DYNAMIC_SPLIT_IP hitting ham
Kevin A. McGrail   Re: HELO_DYNAMIC_IPADDR2 & HELO_DYNAMIC_SPLIT_IP hitting ham Mon, 07 Jan, 19:40
Re: the sa-rules tarball http://spamassassin.apache.org/ is ancient
Kevin A. McGrail   Re: the sa-rules tarball http://spamassassin.apache.org/ is ancient Mon, 07 Jan, 19:42
Re: Understanding KAM_MXURI
Kevin A. McGrail   Re: Understanding KAM_MXURI Mon, 07 Jan, 22:14
Jeremy Morton Added me to wiki contributors? Tue, 08 Jan, 22:25
Karsten Br├Ąckelmann   Re: Added me to wiki contributors? Wed, 23 Jan, 02:28
Karsten Br├Ąckelmann     Re: Added me to wiki contributors? Wed, 23 Jan, 02:50
Kevin A. McGrail       Re: Added me to wiki contributors? Wed, 23 Jan, 03:34
Jeremy Morton Problem with SpamAssassin wiki formatting Wed, 09 Jan, 00:07
Ben Johnson Calling spamassassin directly yields very different results than calling spamassassin via amavis-new Wed, 09 Jan, 22:14
Marius Gavrilescu   Re: Calling spamassassin directly yields very different results than calling spamassassin via amavis-new Wed, 09 Jan, 22:29
RW   Re: Calling spamassassin directly yields very different results than calling spamassassin via amavis-new Wed, 09 Jan, 22:36
Ben Johnson     Re: Calling spamassassin directly yields very different results than calling spamassassin via amavis-new Thu, 10 Jan, 00:03
wolfgang       Re: Calling spamassassin directly yields very different results than calling spamassassin via amavis-new Thu, 10 Jan, 00:36
Ben Johnson         Re: Calling spamassassin directly yields very different results than calling spamassassin via amavis-new Thu, 10 Jan, 01:58
John Hardin           Re: Calling spamassassin directly yields very different results than calling spamassassin via amavis-new Thu, 10 Jan, 02:13
Ben Johnson             Re: Calling spamassassin directly yields very different results than calling spamassassin via amavis-new Thu, 10 Jan, 16:43
RW               Re: Calling spamassassin directly yields very different results than calling spamassassin via amavis-new Thu, 10 Jan, 16:49
Ben Johnson                 Re: Calling spamassassin directly yields very different results than calling spamassassin via amavis-new Thu, 10 Jan, 17:18
Ben Johnson                   Re: Calling spamassassin directly yields very different results than calling spamassassin via amavis-new Thu, 10 Jan, 17:48
RW                     Re: Calling spamassassin directly yields very different results than calling spamassassin via amavis-new Thu, 10 Jan, 18:06
Ben Johnson                       Re: Calling spamassassin directly yields very different results than calling spamassassin via amavis-new Thu, 10 Jan, 18:55
Tom Hendrikx                         Re: Calling spamassassin directly yields very different results than calling spamassassin via amavis-new Thu, 10 Jan, 20:13
Ben Johnson                           Re: Calling spamassassin directly yields very different results than calling spamassassin via amavis-new Fri, 11 Jan, 21:27
Ben Johnson                             Re: Calling spamassassin directly yields very different results than calling spamassassin via amavis-new Mon, 14 Jan, 18:24
RW                               Re: Calling spamassassin directly yields very different results than calling spamassassin via amavis-new Mon, 14 Jan, 19:49
Ben Johnson                                 Re: Calling spamassassin directly yields very different results than calling spamassassin via amavis-new Mon, 14 Jan, 20:59
jdow                                   Re: Calling spamassassin directly yields very different results than calling spamassassin via amavis-new Mon, 14 Jan, 23:41
Noel                                   Re: Calling spamassassin directly yields very different results than calling spamassassin via amavis-new Tue, 15 Jan, 00:48
Ben Johnson                                     Re: Calling spamassassin directly yields very different results than calling spamassassin via amavis-new Tue, 15 Jan, 15:27
jdow                                       Re: Calling spamassassin directly yields very different results than calling spamassassin via amavis-new Tue, 15 Jan, 23:33
John Hardin                                   Re: Calling spamassassin directly yields very different results than calling spamassassin via amavis-new Tue, 15 Jan, 01:16
Ben Johnson                                     Re: Calling spamassassin directly yields very different results than calling spamassassin via amavis-new Tue, 15 Jan, 16:26
John Hardin                                       Re: Calling spamassassin directly yields very different results than calling spamassassin via amavis-new Tue, 15 Jan, 18:55
Ben Johnson                                         Re: Calling spamassassin directly yields very different results than calling spamassassin via amavis-new Tue, 15 Jan, 20:39
Ben Johnson                                           Re: Calling spamassassin directly yields very different results than calling spamassassin via amavis-new Tue, 15 Jan, 20:47
Bowie Bailey                                             Re: Calling spamassassin directly yields very different results than calling spamassassin via amavis-new Tue, 15 Jan, 21:05
Ben Johnson                                               Re: Calling spamassassin directly yields very different results than calling spamassassin via amavis-new Tue, 15 Jan, 21:27
Bowie Bailey                                                 Re: Calling spamassassin directly yields very different results than calling spamassassin via amavis-new Tue, 15 Jan, 21:39
Ben Johnson                                                   Re: Calling spamassassin directly yields very different results than calling spamassassin via amavis-new Tue, 15 Jan, 21:50
John Hardin                                           Re: Calling spamassassin directly yields very different results than calling spamassassin via amavis-new Tue, 15 Jan, 22:22
Ben Johnson                                             Re: Calling spamassassin directly yields very different results than calling spamassassin via amavis-new Wed, 16 Jan, 15:49
John Hardin                                               Re: Calling spamassassin directly yields very different results than calling spamassassin via amavis-new Wed, 16 Jan, 16:00
Ben Johnson                                                 Re: Calling spamassassin directly yields very different results than calling spamassassin via amavis-new Wed, 16 Jan, 18:18
John Hardin                                                   Re: Calling spamassassin directly yields very different results than calling spamassassin via amavis-new Wed, 16 Jan, 19:15
Bowie Bailey                                                   Re: Calling spamassassin directly yields very different results than calling spamassassin via amavis-new Wed, 16 Jan, 19:22
Ben Johnson                                                     Re: Calling spamassassin directly yields very different results than calling spamassassin via amavis-new Wed, 16 Jan, 21:31
Ben Johnson                                                       Re: Calling spamassassin directly yields very different results than calling spamassassin via amavis-new Fri, 18 Jan, 16:51
Alex                                                   Re: Calling spamassassin directly yields very different results than calling spamassassin via amavis-new Wed, 16 Jan, 21:18
Bowie Bailey                                               Re: Calling spamassassin directly yields very different results than calling spamassassin via amavis-new Wed, 16 Jan, 16:04
Noel                                               Re: Calling spamassassin directly yields very different results than calling spamassassin via amavis-new Wed, 16 Jan, 17:05
Ben Johnson                                             Re: Calling spamassassin directly yields very different results than calling spamassassin via amavis-new Thu, 31 Jan, 18:16
John Hardin                                               Re: Calling spamassassin directly yields very different results than calling spamassassin via amavis-new Thu, 31 Jan, 20:12
RW                                                 Re: Calling spamassassin directly yields very different results than calling spamassassin via amavis-new Thu, 31 Jan, 22:50
jdow                                       Re: Calling spamassassin directly yields very different results than calling spamassassin via amavis-new Tue, 15 Jan, 23:38
John Hardin                                         Re: Calling spamassassin directly yields very different results than calling spamassassin via amavis-new Wed, 16 Jan, 01:23
jdow                                           Re: Calling spamassassin directly yields very different results than calling spamassassin via amavis-new Wed, 16 Jan, 04:45
Tom Hendrikx                                       Re: Calling spamassassin directly yields very different results than calling spamassassin via amavis-new Wed, 16 Jan, 07:02
Ben Johnson                                         Re: Calling spamassassin directly yields very different results than calling spamassassin via amavis-new Wed, 16 Jan, 15:58
jdow                               Re: Calling spamassassin directly yields very different results than calling spamassassin via amavis-new Mon, 14 Jan, 23:36
John Hardin                         Re: Calling spamassassin directly yields very different results than calling spamassassin via amavis-new Thu, 10 Jan, 21:12
Ben Johnson                           Re: Calling spamassassin directly yields very different results than calling spamassassin via amavis-new Fri, 11 Jan, 20:25
RW                         Re: Calling spamassassin directly yields very different results than calling spamassassin via amavis-new Fri, 11 Jan, 11:29
Ned Slider       Re: Calling spamassassin directly yields very different results than calling spamassassin via amavis-new Thu, 10 Jan, 04:51
Tom Hendrikx spamc exit code for exceeding max size Thu, 10 Jan, 11:41
Kevin A. McGrail   Re: spamc exit code for exceeding max size Thu, 10 Jan, 13:49
Tom Hendrikx     Re: spamc exit code for exceeding max size Thu, 10 Jan, 14:59
Kevin A. McGrail       Re: spamc exit code for exceeding max size Thu, 10 Jan, 15:03
Martin Gregorie       Re: spamc exit code for exceeding max size Thu, 10 Jan, 16:26
Kevin A. McGrail         Re: spamc exit code for exceeding max size Thu, 10 Jan, 16:51
Martin Gregorie           Re: spamc exit code for exceeding max size Thu, 10 Jan, 18:51
Tom Hendrikx           Re: spamc exit code for exceeding max size Thu, 10 Jan, 20:16
Kevin A. McGrail             Re: spamc exit code for exceeding max size Thu, 10 Jan, 21:43
Tom Hendrikx               Re: spamc exit code for exceeding max size Thu, 10 Jan, 22:16
Kevin A. McGrail                 Re: spamc exit code for exceeding max size Thu, 10 Jan, 22:33
Martin Gregorie                 Re: spamc exit code for exceeding max size Thu, 10 Jan, 23:17
jdow                 Re: spamc exit code for exceeding max size Fri, 11 Jan, 01:46
Kevin A. McGrail                   Re: spamc exit code for exceeding max size Fri, 11 Jan, 17:37
John Hardin                     Re: spamc exit code for exceeding max size Fri, 11 Jan, 18:10
John Hardin                       Re: spamc exit code for exceeding max size Fri, 11 Jan, 18:25
Kevin A. McGrail                       Re: spamc exit code for exceeding max size Fri, 11 Jan, 18:45
Tom Hendrikx                         Re: spamc exit code for exceeding max size Fri, 11 Jan, 19:25
jdow                         Re: spamc exit code for exceeding max size Sat, 12 Jan, 00:37
Tom Hendrikx         Re: spamc exit code for exceeding max size Thu, 10 Jan, 23:20
Martin Gregorie           Re: spamc exit code for exceeding max size Fri, 11 Jan, 00:18
Kevin A. McGrail             Re: spamc exit code for exceeding max size Fri, 11 Jan, 00:49
Martin Gregorie               Re: spamc exit code for exceeding max size Fri, 11 Jan, 12:52
Kevin A. McGrail                 Re: spamc exit code for exceeding max size Fri, 11 Jan, 17:34
Kevin A. McGrail                   Re: spamc exit code for exceeding max size Fri, 11 Jan, 21:35
Martin Gregorie                     Re: spamc exit code for exceeding max size Fri, 11 Jan, 22:30
Kevin A. McGrail                       Re: spamc exit code for exceeding max size Fri, 11 Jan, 22:44
Martin Gregorie SHA1 verification failure during sa_update Fri, 18 Jan, 10:25
Kevin A. McGrail   Re: SHA1 verification failure during sa_update Fri, 18 Jan, 10:28
Kevin A. McGrail     Re: SHA1 verification failure during sa_update Fri, 18 Jan, 12:02
Martin Gregorie       Re: SHA1 verification failure during sa_update Fri, 18 Jan, 13:11
Kevin A. McGrail         Re: SHA1 verification failure during sa_update Fri, 18 Jan, 18:04
Martin Gregorie           Re: SHA1 verification failure during sa_update Fri, 18 Jan, 18:28
Niamh Holding sa-stats.pl illegal division by zero Mon, 21 Jan, 17:25
Kevin A. McGrail   Re: sa-stats.pl illegal division by zero Mon, 21 Jan, 18:33
Niamh Holding     Re: sa-stats.pl illegal division by zero Mon, 21 Jan, 19:23
Kevin A. McGrail       Re: sa-stats.pl illegal division by zero Mon, 21 Jan, 19:30
Niamh Holding         Re: sa-stats.pl illegal division by zero Tue, 22 Jan, 06:46
Kevin A. McGrail           Re: sa-stats.pl illegal division by zero Tue, 22 Jan, 12:17
Niamh Holding             Re: sa-stats.pl illegal division by zero Tue, 22 Jan, 13:00
Kevin A. McGrail               Re: sa-stats.pl illegal division by zero Tue, 22 Jan, 15:19
Niamh Holding             Re: sa-stats.pl illegal division by zero Tue, 22 Jan, 17:32
Kevin A. McGrail               Re: sa-stats.pl illegal division by zero Wed, 23 Jan, 03:44
Niamh Holding                 Re: sa-stats.pl illegal division by zero Wed, 23 Jan, 06:43
Kevin A. McGrail                   Re: sa-stats.pl illegal division by zero Wed, 23 Jan, 14:18
Kevin A. McGrail                     Re: sa-stats.pl illegal division by zero Wed, 23 Jan, 14:26
Niamh Holding                       Re: sa-stats.pl illegal division by zero Thu, 24 Jan, 06:40
Kevin A. McGrail                         Re: sa-stats.pl illegal division by zero Thu, 24 Jan, 13:48
Alexey Galkin Rules on UPGRADE Wed, 23 Jan, 04:50
Kevin A. McGrail   Re: Rules on UPGRADE Wed, 23 Jan, 04:52
Alexey Galkin     RE: Rules on UPGRADE Wed, 23 Jan, 05:15
Kevin A. McGrail       Re: Rules on UPGRADE Wed, 23 Jan, 05:16
tony sudden increase in spam Thu, 24 Jan, 09:41
Robert Schetterer   Re: sudden increase in spam Thu, 24 Jan, 12:19
Martin Gregorie   Re: sudden increase in spam Thu, 24 Jan, 12:48
Marc Perkel   Re: sudden increase in spam Fri, 25 Jan, 12:46
Walter Hurry SpamAsassin can't find dccproc Thu, 24 Jan, 22:33
David B Funk   Re: SpamAsassin can't find dccproc Fri, 25 Jan, 07:50
Walter Hurry     Re: SpamAsassin can't find dccproc Fri, 25 Jan, 08:29
Greg Troxel whitelist rules should specify the IP address/domain/etc. Fri, 25 Jan, 01:21
Greg Troxel returnpath rules considered harmful Fri, 25 Jan, 01:22
RW   Re: returnpath rules considered harmful Fri, 25 Jan, 12:55
Benny Pedersen   Re: returnpath rules considered harmful Fri, 25 Jan, 17:22
Cedric Knight spameatingmonkey.net down? Fri, 25 Jan, 13:12
Tom Kinghorn   Re: spameatingmonkey.net down? Fri, 25 Jan, 13:20
Cedric Knight     Re: spameatingmonkey.net down? Fri, 25 Jan, 17:20
Cedric Knight   Re: spameatingmonkey.net down? Sun, 27 Jan, 13:03
Lutz Petersen     Re: spameatingmonkey.net down? Sun, 27 Jan, 17:00
mario21 Whitelist and DNS blacklists in SpamAssassin Fri, 25 Jan, 18:06
Ted Hatfield   Re: Whitelist and DNS blacklists in SpamAssassin Fri, 25 Jan, 18:23
Robert Schetterer   Re: Whitelist and DNS blacklists in SpamAssassin Fri, 25 Jan, 19:09
mario21     Re: Whitelist and DNS blacklists in SpamAssassin Fri, 25 Jan, 20:53
Ted Hatfield       Re: Whitelist and DNS blacklists in SpamAssassin Fri, 25 Jan, 21:12
Benny Pedersen       Re: Whitelist and DNS blacklists in SpamAssassin Fri, 25 Jan, 21:15
mario21         Re: Whitelist and DNS blacklists in SpamAssassin Fri, 25 Jan, 22:57
Ted Hatfield           Re: Whitelist and DNS blacklists in SpamAssassin Sat, 26 Jan, 00:14
Robert Schetterer           Re: Whitelist and DNS blacklists in SpamAssassin Sat, 26 Jan, 07:26
Robert Schetterer       Re: Whitelist and DNS blacklists in SpamAssassin Sat, 26 Jan, 07:22
Margot Romary re: returnpath rules considered harmful Sat, 26 Jan, 01:48
Message listThread · Author · Date
Box list
Oct 2014491
Sep 2014513
Aug 2014577
Jul 2014540
Jun 2014383
May 2014273
Apr 2014213
Mar 2014144
Feb 2014316
Jan 2014211
Dec 2013105
Nov 2013240
Oct 2013331
Sep 2013222
Aug 2013290
Jul 2013236
Jun 2013335
May 2013320
Apr 2013308
Mar 2013241
Feb 2013284
Jan 2013163
Dec 2012185
Nov 2012231
Oct 2012283
Sep 2012183
Aug 2012231
Jul 2012117
Jun 2012210
May 2012113
Apr 2012215
Mar 2012416
Feb 2012300
Jan 2012178
Dec 2011328
Nov 2011421
Oct 2011493
Sep 2011173
Aug 2011292
Jul 2011366
Jun 2011380
May 2011232
Apr 2011310
Mar 2011519
Feb 2011323
Jan 2011366
Dec 2010467
Nov 2010349
Oct 2010403
Sep 2010375
Aug 2010452
Jul 2010417
Jun 2010484
May 2010348
Apr 2010663
Mar 2010872
Feb 2010779
Jan 2010904
Dec 2009800
Nov 2009569
Oct 20091015
Sep 2009743
Aug 2009814
Jul 20091312
Jun 20091048
May 20091220
Apr 2009840
Mar 2009857
Feb 2009635
Jan 2009698
Dec 2008758
Nov 2008549
Oct 2008741
Sep 2008782
Aug 2008539
Jul 2008675
Jun 2008875
May 2008733
Apr 2008815
Mar 2008963
Feb 20081006
Jan 2008735
Dec 2007445
Nov 2007491
Oct 2007751
Sep 2007739
Aug 20071604
Jul 20071566
Jun 20071243
May 20071156
Apr 2007790
Mar 20071076
Feb 20071252
Jan 20071284
Dec 20061679
Nov 20062061
Oct 20062019
Sep 20061123
Aug 20062057
Jul 20061152
Jun 20061315
May 20061294
Apr 20061039
Mar 20061321
Feb 20061434
Jan 20061005
Dec 20051182
Nov 2005997
Oct 2005821
Sep 20051152
Aug 20051027
Jul 20051239
Jun 20051267
May 20051795
Apr 2005956
Mar 20051283
Feb 20051205
Jan 20051400
Dec 20041379
Nov 20041323
Oct 20041702
Sep 20041983
Aug 20041472
Jul 20041844
Jun 20042022
May 20041974
Apr 20042478
Mar 20042830
Feb 20042380
Jan 200426