spamassassin-users mailing list archives: January 2013

Site index · List index
Message list1 · 2 · Next »Thread · Author · Date
Kevin A. McGrail Re: Request for wiki access Tue, 01 Jan, 01:14
Fabio Sangiovanni URIDNSBL: how to query certain lists only? Fri, 04 Jan, 10:48
Alexandre Boyer Re: URIDNSBL: how to query certain lists only? Fri, 04 Jan, 13:22
Kris Deugau Re: URIDNSBL: how to query certain lists only? Fri, 04 Jan, 14:38
Daniel McDonald Re: URIDNSBL: how to query certain lists only? Fri, 04 Jan, 15:52
Kris Deugau Re: URIDNSBL: how to query certain lists only? Fri, 04 Jan, 17:12
Jeremy Morton Is the SpamAssassin wiki dead? Sun, 06 Jan, 12:49
Jeremy McSpadden Re: Is the SpamAssassin wiki dead? Sun, 06 Jan, 14:25
Fabio Sangiovanni Re: URIDNSBL: how to query certain lists only? Mon, 07 Jan, 09:18
s.@yacc.co.uk Does anyone recognise this? Mon, 07 Jan, 17:04
Ned Slider FPs on AXB_XMAILER_MIMEOLE_OL_B054A Mon, 07 Jan, 17:29
Rob McEwen ANNOUNCEMENT: update to ivmURI regarding surge in rarely-blacklisted domains spammers use from legit site that are "compromised" Mon, 07 Jan, 18:15
dar...@chaosreigns.com Re: ANNOUNCEMENT: update to ivmURI regarding surge in rarely-blacklisted domains spammers use from legit site that are "compromised" Mon, 07 Jan, 18:53
Alexandre Boyer Re: URIDNSBL: how to query certain lists only? Mon, 07 Jan, 19:02
Rob McEwen Re: ANNOUNCEMENT: update to ivmURI regarding surge in rarely-blacklisted domains spammers use from legit site that are "compromised" Mon, 07 Jan, 19:19
Kevin A. McGrail Re: HELO_DYNAMIC_IPADDR2 & HELO_DYNAMIC_SPLIT_IP hitting ham Mon, 07 Jan, 19:40
Kevin A. McGrail Re: the sa-rules tarball http://spamassassin.apache.org/ is ancient Mon, 07 Jan, 19:42
Kevin A. McGrail Re: Understanding KAM_MXURI Mon, 07 Jan, 22:14
Jeremy Morton Re: Is the SpamAssassin wiki dead? Mon, 07 Jan, 22:41
dar...@chaosreigns.com Re: Is the SpamAssassin wiki dead? Mon, 07 Jan, 22:49
Kris Deugau Re: FPs on AXB_XMAILER_MIMEOLE_OL_B054A Tue, 08 Jan, 16:27
Kevin A. McGrail Re: FPs on AXB_XMAILER_MIMEOLE_OL_B054A Tue, 08 Jan, 16:31
Ned Slider Re: FPs on AXB_XMAILER_MIMEOLE_OL_B054A Tue, 08 Jan, 19:20
Ned Slider Re: FPs on AXB_XMAILER_MIMEOLE_OL_B054A Tue, 08 Jan, 20:08
Jeremy Morton Added me to wiki contributors? Tue, 08 Jan, 22:25
Jeremy Morton Problem with SpamAssassin wiki formatting Wed, 09 Jan, 00:07
Ben Johnson Calling spamassassin directly yields very different results than calling spamassassin via amavis-new Wed, 09 Jan, 22:14
Marius Gavrilescu Re: Calling spamassassin directly yields very different results than calling spamassassin via amavis-new Wed, 09 Jan, 22:29
RW Re: Calling spamassassin directly yields very different results than calling spamassassin via amavis-new Wed, 09 Jan, 22:36
Ben Johnson Re: Calling spamassassin directly yields very different results than calling spamassassin via amavis-new Thu, 10 Jan, 00:03
wolfgang Re: Calling spamassassin directly yields very different results than calling spamassassin via amavis-new Thu, 10 Jan, 00:36
Ben Johnson Re: Calling spamassassin directly yields very different results than calling spamassassin via amavis-new Thu, 10 Jan, 01:58
John Hardin Re: Calling spamassassin directly yields very different results than calling spamassassin via amavis-new Thu, 10 Jan, 02:13
Ned Slider Re: Calling spamassassin directly yields very different results than calling spamassassin via amavis-new Thu, 10 Jan, 04:51
Tom Hendrikx spamc exit code for exceeding max size Thu, 10 Jan, 11:41
Kevin A. McGrail Re: spamc exit code for exceeding max size Thu, 10 Jan, 13:49
Tom Hendrikx Re: spamc exit code for exceeding max size Thu, 10 Jan, 14:59
Kevin A. McGrail Re: spamc exit code for exceeding max size Thu, 10 Jan, 15:03
Martin Gregorie Re: spamc exit code for exceeding max size Thu, 10 Jan, 16:26
Ben Johnson Re: Calling spamassassin directly yields very different results than calling spamassassin via amavis-new Thu, 10 Jan, 16:43
RW Re: Calling spamassassin directly yields very different results than calling spamassassin via amavis-new Thu, 10 Jan, 16:49
Kevin A. McGrail Re: spamc exit code for exceeding max size Thu, 10 Jan, 16:51
Ben Johnson Re: Calling spamassassin directly yields very different results than calling spamassassin via amavis-new Thu, 10 Jan, 17:18
Ben Johnson Re: Calling spamassassin directly yields very different results than calling spamassassin via amavis-new Thu, 10 Jan, 17:48
RW Re: Calling spamassassin directly yields very different results than calling spamassassin via amavis-new Thu, 10 Jan, 18:06
Martin Gregorie Re: spamc exit code for exceeding max size Thu, 10 Jan, 18:51
Ben Johnson Re: Calling spamassassin directly yields very different results than calling spamassassin via amavis-new Thu, 10 Jan, 18:55
Tom Hendrikx Re: Calling spamassassin directly yields very different results than calling spamassassin via amavis-new Thu, 10 Jan, 20:13
Tom Hendrikx Re: spamc exit code for exceeding max size Thu, 10 Jan, 20:16
John Hardin Re: Calling spamassassin directly yields very different results than calling spamassassin via amavis-new Thu, 10 Jan, 21:12
Kevin A. McGrail Re: spamc exit code for exceeding max size Thu, 10 Jan, 21:43
Tom Hendrikx Re: spamc exit code for exceeding max size Thu, 10 Jan, 22:16
Kevin A. McGrail Re: spamc exit code for exceeding max size Thu, 10 Jan, 22:33
Martin Gregorie Re: spamc exit code for exceeding max size Thu, 10 Jan, 23:17
Tom Hendrikx Re: spamc exit code for exceeding max size Thu, 10 Jan, 23:20
Martin Gregorie Re: spamc exit code for exceeding max size Fri, 11 Jan, 00:18
Kevin A. McGrail Re: spamc exit code for exceeding max size Fri, 11 Jan, 00:49
jdow Re: spamc exit code for exceeding max size Fri, 11 Jan, 01:46
RW Re: Calling spamassassin directly yields very different results than calling spamassassin via amavis-new Fri, 11 Jan, 11:29
Martin Gregorie Re: spamc exit code for exceeding max size Fri, 11 Jan, 12:52
Kevin A. McGrail Re: spamc exit code for exceeding max size Fri, 11 Jan, 17:34
Kevin A. McGrail Re: spamc exit code for exceeding max size Fri, 11 Jan, 17:37
John Hardin Re: spamc exit code for exceeding max size Fri, 11 Jan, 18:10
John Hardin Re: spamc exit code for exceeding max size Fri, 11 Jan, 18:25
Kevin A. McGrail Re: spamc exit code for exceeding max size Fri, 11 Jan, 18:45
Tom Hendrikx Re: spamc exit code for exceeding max size Fri, 11 Jan, 19:25
Ben Johnson Re: Calling spamassassin directly yields very different results than calling spamassassin via amavis-new Fri, 11 Jan, 20:25
Ben Johnson Re: Calling spamassassin directly yields very different results than calling spamassassin via amavis-new Fri, 11 Jan, 21:27
Kevin A. McGrail Re: spamc exit code for exceeding max size Fri, 11 Jan, 21:35
Martin Gregorie Re: spamc exit code for exceeding max size Fri, 11 Jan, 22:30
Kevin A. McGrail Re: spamc exit code for exceeding max size Fri, 11 Jan, 22:44
jdow Re: spamc exit code for exceeding max size Sat, 12 Jan, 00:37
Ben Johnson Re: Calling spamassassin directly yields very different results than calling spamassassin via amavis-new Mon, 14 Jan, 18:24
RW Re: Calling spamassassin directly yields very different results than calling spamassassin via amavis-new Mon, 14 Jan, 19:49
Ben Johnson Re: Calling spamassassin directly yields very different results than calling spamassassin via amavis-new Mon, 14 Jan, 20:59
jdow Re: Calling spamassassin directly yields very different results than calling spamassassin via amavis-new Mon, 14 Jan, 23:36
jdow Re: Calling spamassassin directly yields very different results than calling spamassassin via amavis-new Mon, 14 Jan, 23:41
Noel Re: Calling spamassassin directly yields very different results than calling spamassassin via amavis-new Tue, 15 Jan, 00:48
John Hardin Re: Calling spamassassin directly yields very different results than calling spamassassin via amavis-new Tue, 15 Jan, 01:16
Ben Johnson Re: Calling spamassassin directly yields very different results than calling spamassassin via amavis-new Tue, 15 Jan, 15:27
Ben Johnson Re: Calling spamassassin directly yields very different results than calling spamassassin via amavis-new Tue, 15 Jan, 16:26
John Hardin Re: Calling spamassassin directly yields very different results than calling spamassassin via amavis-new Tue, 15 Jan, 18:55
Ben Johnson Re: Calling spamassassin directly yields very different results than calling spamassassin via amavis-new Tue, 15 Jan, 20:39
Ben Johnson Re: Calling spamassassin directly yields very different results than calling spamassassin via amavis-new Tue, 15 Jan, 20:47
Bowie Bailey Re: Calling spamassassin directly yields very different results than calling spamassassin via amavis-new Tue, 15 Jan, 21:05
Ben Johnson Re: Calling spamassassin directly yields very different results than calling spamassassin via amavis-new Tue, 15 Jan, 21:27
Bowie Bailey Re: Calling spamassassin directly yields very different results than calling spamassassin via amavis-new Tue, 15 Jan, 21:39
Ben Johnson Re: Calling spamassassin directly yields very different results than calling spamassassin via amavis-new Tue, 15 Jan, 21:50
John Hardin Re: Calling spamassassin directly yields very different results than calling spamassassin via amavis-new Tue, 15 Jan, 22:22
jdow Re: Calling spamassassin directly yields very different results than calling spamassassin via amavis-new Tue, 15 Jan, 23:33
jdow Re: Calling spamassassin directly yields very different results than calling spamassassin via amavis-new Tue, 15 Jan, 23:38
John Hardin Re: Calling spamassassin directly yields very different results than calling spamassassin via amavis-new Wed, 16 Jan, 01:23
jdow Re: Calling spamassassin directly yields very different results than calling spamassassin via amavis-new Wed, 16 Jan, 04:45
Tom Hendrikx Re: Calling spamassassin directly yields very different results than calling spamassassin via amavis-new Wed, 16 Jan, 07:02
Ben Johnson Re: Calling spamassassin directly yields very different results than calling spamassassin via amavis-new Wed, 16 Jan, 15:49
Ben Johnson Re: Calling spamassassin directly yields very different results than calling spamassassin via amavis-new Wed, 16 Jan, 15:58
John Hardin Re: Calling spamassassin directly yields very different results than calling spamassassin via amavis-new Wed, 16 Jan, 16:00
Bowie Bailey Re: Calling spamassassin directly yields very different results than calling spamassassin via amavis-new Wed, 16 Jan, 16:04
Noel Re: Calling spamassassin directly yields very different results than calling spamassassin via amavis-new Wed, 16 Jan, 17:05
Ben Johnson Re: Calling spamassassin directly yields very different results than calling spamassassin via amavis-new Wed, 16 Jan, 18:18
Message list1 · 2 · Next »Thread · Author · Date
Box list
Oct 2014442
Sep 2014513
Aug 2014577
Jul 2014540
Jun 2014383
May 2014273
Apr 2014213
Mar 2014144
Feb 2014316
Jan 2014211
Dec 2013105
Nov 2013240
Oct 2013331
Sep 2013222
Aug 2013290
Jul 2013236
Jun 2013335
May 2013320
Apr 2013308
Mar 2013241
Feb 2013284
Jan 2013163
Dec 2012185
Nov 2012231
Oct 2012283
Sep 2012183
Aug 2012231
Jul 2012117
Jun 2012210
May 2012113
Apr 2012215
Mar 2012416
Feb 2012300
Jan 2012178
Dec 2011328
Nov 2011421
Oct 2011493
Sep 2011173
Aug 2011292
Jul 2011366
Jun 2011380
May 2011232
Apr 2011310
Mar 2011519
Feb 2011323
Jan 2011366
Dec 2010467
Nov 2010349
Oct 2010403
Sep 2010375
Aug 2010452
Jul 2010417
Jun 2010484
May 2010348
Apr 2010663
Mar 2010872
Feb 2010779
Jan 2010904
Dec 2009800
Nov 2009569
Oct 20091015
Sep 2009743
Aug 2009814
Jul 20091312
Jun 20091048
May 20091220
Apr 2009840
Mar 2009857
Feb 2009635
Jan 2009698
Dec 2008758
Nov 2008549
Oct 2008741
Sep 2008782
Aug 2008539
Jul 2008675
Jun 2008875
May 2008733
Apr 2008815
Mar 2008963
Feb 20081006
Jan 2008735
Dec 2007445
Nov 2007491
Oct 2007751
Sep 2007739
Aug 20071604
Jul 20071566
Jun 20071243
May 20071156
Apr 2007790
Mar 20071076
Feb 20071252
Jan 20071284
Dec 20061679
Nov 20062061
Oct 20062019
Sep 20061123
Aug 20062057
Jul 20061152
Jun 20061315
May 20061294
Apr 20061039
Mar 20061321
Feb 20061434
Jan 20061005
Dec 20051182
Nov 2005997
Oct 2005821
Sep 20051152
Aug 20051027
Jul 20051239
Jun 20051267
May 20051795
Apr 2005956
Mar 20051283
Feb 20051205
Jan 20051400
Dec 20041379
Nov 20041323
Oct 20041702
Sep 20041983
Aug 20041472
Jul 20041844
Jun 20042022
May 20041974
Apr 20042478
Mar 20042830
Feb 20042380
Jan 200426