spamassassin-users mailing list archives

Site index · List index
Message view « Date » · « Thread »
Top « Date » · « Thread »
From RW <rwmailli...@googlemail.com>
Subject Re: Missed SPAM
Date Sat, 31 Mar 2012 22:27:42 GMT
On Sat, 31 Mar 2012 12:17:52 -0400
joea wrote:


> Beyond that, where can I find the difference, in a SPAM learning
> sense, between "sa-learn --spam filename" and "spamassassin -r <
> filename"?
> 
> If I do the sa-learn on the same file, after doing spamassassin, it
> tells me 0 tokens. If I then do "sa-learn --forget filename", then
> "sa-learn --spam filename" it tells me 1 token learned.

Are you sure that's what it says and not tokens from 1 message? The
reason I ask is that it's practically impossible for Bayes to find only
one token, so it would be a sign that something is wrong if some part
of spamassassin is telling you that.



> I infer from this they perform similar or the same function, from a
> Bayes sense.

spamassassin -r is mainly for reporting spam to SpamCop, Pyzor, etc,
training Bayes is just a side-effect. But there's no grounds for
thinking the training is going to be any different to running sa-learn
or auto-training.


Mime
View raw message