spamassassin-users mailing list archives

Site index · List index
Message view « Date » · « Thread »
Top « Date » · « Thread »
From AJ Weber <awe...@comcast.net>
Subject Re: rule to test "body" length?
Date Mon, 09 Jan 2012 00:26:57 GMT


> Please don't top-post.

Sorry.  Even though I subscribed, and sent the "confirmation" email, I still
don't get any of the messages in my email, so I'm posting via the "Old
Nabble" web form.  That doesn't allow me to automate indenting/quoting
previous messages, so I will manually put &gt's in front of all the lines if
you want.

>Body tests are run per paragraph, so you would need one of then to
>have 100 chars. 

Wow.  I would've thought I would have run across this info in all the
searching I've done about rules and custom rules.  Good to know, thanks.

>Also they are just run on just the text that the reader
>would see, if that matters to you. If you are intending to give this a
>significant score, then it seems a bit reckless to me. Do you never
>receive terse emails?

I sometimes receive terse emails, but very rarely to the accounts I'm trying
to protect with SA.  Since no spam filter is 100%, this just seems to be a
rule that I could use, with an appropriate score.

>If you are new to SA I would suggest you start with making sure that
>Bayes is properly trained, and you have have the infrastructure to
>keep it trained without much effort. Razor DCC etc are fairly minor
>components compared to BAYES.

I can train Bayes, but keeping it trained might be a bit of effort for the
install size I'm dealing with (small).  Since this is a combination of work-
and non-work mailboxes, the breadth of email types that the users would
consider ham is probably not going to make Bayes training very accurate, but
I would love to be wrong.

Thanks for the reply.
-- 
View this message in context: http://old.nabble.com/rule-to-test-%22body%22-length--tp33092865p33104550.html
Sent from the SpamAssassin - Users mailing list archive at Nabble.com.


Mime
View raw message