spamassassin-users mailing list archives

Site index · List index
Message view « Date » · « Thread »
Top « Date » · « Thread »
From "Kevin A. McGrail" <>
Subject Re: DNS{B,W}Ls and blocking (was Re: DNSWL will be disabled by default as of tomorrow)
Date Wed, 14 Dec 2011 15:18:52 GMT
On 12/14/2011 4:24 AM, Benny Pedersen wrote:
> On Tue, 13 Dec 2011 09:21:47 -0500, David F. Skoll wrote:
>> I think we need an informational RFC that specifies best-practices for
>> a DNS{B,W}L to inform clients that they have been blocked.
> good intention, but if dns is blocket there is no result anyway so it 
> does not work
Not quite.  We are working on return codes that lead to the end the 
purposefully wrong answers for DNSBLs so Blocked doesn't mean 
blackholing the requests.  Confusing, I know.


View raw message