spamassassin-users mailing list archives

Site index · List index
Message view « Date » · « Thread »
Top « Date » · « Thread »
From RW <rwmailli...@googlemail.com>
Subject Re: Return Path Whitelists, RP_SAFE, RP_CERTIFIED, RP_MATCHES‏
Date Mon, 21 Nov 2011 13:50:05 GMT
On Mon, 21 Nov 2011 03:11:48 -0800 (PST)
pipjg wrote:

> 
> Hi,
> 
> Was wondering if could have some advice, and I probably know what I'm
> going to do anyway, just wanted a few others opinions..
> 
> I've been analysing a load of mail which is having it's SA score
> reduced by what looks like paid for whitelists. A view of the SA
> scores I'm seeing is:
> 
> Rule  	Total  	Ham  	%  	Spam  	%
> RP_MATCHES_RCVD  	161,165 	142,559 	88.5
> 18,606 	11.5 RCVD_IN_RP_SAFE  	22,405 	22,399
> 	100 	6 	0 RCVD_IN_RP_CERTIFIED  	22,130
> 	22,125 	100 	5 	0 RCVD_IN_RP_RNBL
> 	12,794 	43 	0.3 	12,751 	99.7
> T_RP_MATCHES_RCVD  	7,080 	5,072 	71.6
> 2,008 	28.4
> 
> Now looking at virtualls ALL of these they look like SPAM.

No they don't, you haven't read your own results correctly.
RCVD_IN_RP_SAFE and RCVD_IN_RP_CERTIFIED are ~100% Ham. RCVD_IN_RP_RNBL
is a blacklist rule, so it's supposed to hit spam.

[T_]RP_MATCHES_RCVD are not ReturnPath whitelist rules:

describe RP_MATCHES_RCVD  Envelope sender domain matches handover relay
domain

Everything related to ReturnPath.net/senderscore is working
remarkably well for you.


> For some reason I can't find any scores for T_RP_MATCHES_RCVD. Am I
> being dumn here? Does the T_ mean something I don't know?

T_* rules are under test, so it's an earlier name for RP_MATCHES_RCVD.

Mime
View raw message