Mailing-List: contact users-help@spamassassin.apache.org; run by ezmlm
Precedence: bulk
Received-SPF: pass (athena.apache.org: domain of andrzej.filip@gmail.com
 designates 209.85.161.46 as permitted sender)
From: Andrzej Adam Filip <andrzej.filip@gmail.com>
To: users@spamassassin.apache.org
Subject: Re: Autowhitelist based on Return-Path: (envelope sender) for mailing
 list
References: <gidh1mc18g+B78@jeana.huge.strangled.net>
	<20110708191111.GF9759@michelle1>
Date: Fri, 08 Jul 2011 23:14:33 +0200
In-Reply-To: <20110708191111.GF9759@michelle1> (Michelle Konzack's message of
	"Fri, 8 Jul 2011 21:11:11 +0200")
Message-ID: <injv7uw29h+B78@jeana.huge.strangled.net>
MIME-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii

Michelle Konzack <linux4michelle@tamay-dogan.net> wrote:
> Hello Andrzej Adam Filip,
>
> Am 2011-07-08 18:05:11, hacktest Du folgendes herunter:
>> Would not it make sense to add autowhitelisting based on Return-Path:
>> header (envelope sender) to auto whitelist mailing lists?
>> [ It may be triggered only when List-Id: header is present. ]
>
> Not even the half of the Mailinglist I  am  subscribed  (131)  have  the
> "List-Id:" heder...

Some may dislike idea of creating entry for every Return-Path:.

I think I have seen at least one mailing list with varying  envelope
sender (VERP variant) in message I have received.

Could you state your position more clearly?
You for adding "return-path: *only*" whitelisting, are not your?

-- 
[pl>en: Andrew] Andrzej Adam Filip : anfi@onet.eu
Every living thing wants to survive.
  -- Spock, "The Ultimate Computer", stardate 4731.3