spamassassin-users mailing list archives

Site index · List index
Message view « Date » · « Thread »
Top « Date » · « Thread »
From Justin Mason ...@jmason.org>
Subject Re: Mailspike Performance
Date Fri, 15 Apr 2011 10:14:15 GMT
On Thu, Apr 14, 2011 at 22:51, Adam Katz <antispam@khopis.com> wrote:
> RCVD_IN_MSPIKE_BL has 99% overlap with the SA3.3 set and 98% with the
> SA3.2 set.  That leaves 0.6758% of spam uniquely hitting this DNSBL (1%
> of its 67.5822%).  RCVD_IN_SEMBLACK has the same story, resulting in
> 0.5138% unique spam from its 1% non-overlap (though note its lower s/o).

Good point. But what about the ham?  if it hits the same spam, but
less ham, it's a better rule.

--j.

Mime
View raw message