Mailing-List: contact users-help@spamassassin.apache.org; run by ezmlm
Precedence: bulk
Received-SPF: pass (nike.apache.org: domain of nigel@blue-canoe.com designates
 217.36.54.209 as permitted sender)
From: Nigel Frankcom <nigel@blue-canoe.com>
To: users@spamassassin.apache.org
Subject: Re: Performance on Spear Phishing?
Date: Fri, 18 Mar 2011 11:28:08 +0000
Organization: Blue Canoe Networks
Message-ID: <c2g6o6dna4oilccui179krhindnmveicov@blue-canoe.net>
References: <COL115-W48719C3CFEEA8303AF817FD5CB0@phx.gbl>
 <4D7AB2CE.5010509@gmail.com>	<20110312142616.0b32bb30@gumby.homeunix.com>
 <Pine.OSX.4.64.1103121445100.289@dave-g5.local>
 <20110313012513.7e512b24@gumby.homeunix.com>
 ,<4D7C3E12.8080803@earthlink.net>
 <COL115-W193AF94896486E8431426BD5B10@phx.gbl>
 <1300333109.4842.49.camel@monkey>
 <5414o6dbj9pbgivn8k4cev8gbaf6hvgjtt@blue-canoe.net>
 <1300418560.4918.77.camel@monkey>
In-Reply-To: <1300418560.4918.77.camel@monkey>
MIME-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: text/plain; charset=ISO-8859-1
Content-Transfer-Encoding: 8bit

On Fri, 18 Mar 2011 04:22:40 +0100, Karsten Br�ckelmann
<guenther@rudersport.de> wrote:

>On Thu, 2011-03-17 at 12:58 +0000, Nigel Frankcom wrote:
>> Unrelated but reminded me I hadn't posted a thanks to all those that
>> responded about the sa-update rules. That's partly because I'm
>> awaiting permission from clients to add their mails to the corpus.
>
>Unrelated indeed. ;)  That short rant of mine was not meant as a broad
>reminder to send your 'thank you's after each post, less so to collect
>them now -- but really triggered by that one particular instance.
>
>There are a bunch of circumstances (some slightly buried down the end)
>outlined in my previous post, which, each on their own, if avoided, are
>likely to not have triggered my reaction in the first place. In other
>words, just try to engage in the community, and don't forget basic
>(old-school) net-iquette, and we all should get along just fine. :)
>
>> So, thanks all. Apologies for forgetting my manners.
>> 
>> Have no clue about Spear Phishing other than it's best to be the one
>> with the spear. :-)
>
>Or the hammer.

Hi Karsten,

Having been using this list for more years than I care to think about
I ought to know my manners better. It was a timely reminder, it's easy
to take the help one gets here for granted. I don't tend to post so
much nowadays with workloads etc, but it's the only list I stay
subscribed to. I do on occasion sit with a beer on a boring evening
and amble through the posts, and, occasionally, I note things with my
setup that seem a bit off.

Without wishing to tempt fate, my setup works well for me and works
well. Often as not because of advice given in the past by list
members; anyway, manners cost nothing and they do have a value for the
recipients.

All the best

Nigel