spamassassin-users mailing list archives

Site index · List index
Message view « Date » · « Thread »
Top « Date » · « Thread »
From Joseph Brennan <bren...@columbia.edu>
Subject Re: Points for missing MX Records
Date Thu, 24 Feb 2011 14:43:24 GMT

Multiple comments ...


> I just want Spamassassin to check if there is a MX Record in DNS for
> the sender.

I have no sense of how productive this would be.  Have you looked up
a good sample of sender domains and found that spammers are significantly
less likely to have an MX?  That would make it interesting to check.



> It would  also be cool if Spamassassin could compare senderdomain
> and helo name.

Helo should match the hostname, but that's all.  There are many
instances where the sender address is a different domain.  Vanity
domains, third-party mailings, and merged companies lead the list.
Much of it is legitimate mail.  Check any online bank or credit
statements you might have, for example.



> reject_unknown_sender_domain
>
>  Reject the request when Postfix is not final destination for the sender
> address, and the MAIL FROM address has no DNS A or MX record,

I assume that, like Sendmail, it has already converted CNAMEs
when it does this test.  Sendmail rejects for having none of MX, A,
or AAAA.  That hits 3% of mail thrown at our system.



> The problem, is that a MX record is NOT required for a sending host.

Who proposed checking that?  The question was about checking for an
MX record for the sender address, not the host.



Joseph Brennan
Columbia University Information Technology


Mime
View raw message