Return-Path: Delivered-To: apmail-spamassassin-users-archive@www.apache.org Received: (qmail 25183 invoked from network); 24 Dec 2010 23:58:38 -0000 Received: from unknown (HELO mail.apache.org) (140.211.11.3) by 140.211.11.9 with SMTP; 24 Dec 2010 23:58:38 -0000 Received: (qmail 49297 invoked by uid 500); 24 Dec 2010 23:58:35 -0000 Delivered-To: apmail-spamassassin-users-archive@spamassassin.apache.org Received: (qmail 49268 invoked by uid 500); 24 Dec 2010 23:58:35 -0000 Mailing-List: contact users-help@spamassassin.apache.org; run by ezmlm Precedence: bulk list-help: list-unsubscribe: List-Post: List-Id: Delivered-To: mailing list users@spamassassin.apache.org Received: (qmail 49260 invoked by uid 99); 24 Dec 2010 23:58:35 -0000 Received: from nike.apache.org (HELO nike.apache.org) (192.87.106.230) by apache.org (qpsmtpd/0.29) with ESMTP; Fri, 24 Dec 2010 23:58:35 +0000 X-ASF-Spam-Status: No, hits=1.5 required=10.0 tests=FREEMAIL_FROM,HTML_MESSAGE,RCVD_IN_DNSWL_LOW,SPF_PASS,T_TO_NO_BRKTS_FREEMAIL X-Spam-Check-By: apache.org Received-SPF: pass (nike.apache.org: domain of wtogami@gmail.com designates 74.125.82.178 as permitted sender) Received: from [74.125.82.178] (HELO mail-wy0-f178.google.com) (74.125.82.178) by apache.org (qpsmtpd/0.29) with ESMTP; Fri, 24 Dec 2010 23:58:28 +0000 Received: by wyb42 with SMTP id 42so7492651wyb.37 for ; Fri, 24 Dec 2010 15:58:08 -0800 (PST) DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=gmail.com; s=gamma; h=domainkey-signature:mime-version:received:received:received :in-reply-to:references:date:message-id:subject:from:to:content-type; bh=uAF+B2jBpqrhfgaaIXWBmCJY4cYqJ1Uz9c0G4CZyaDc=; b=HBGSnLQer3RTU1KoPsijXjVjI4KYyMARM11q63GqUZQTFF7rVEiFIRe3cQ9uC+OIEA mVrwW6gBxWeC/ypFg3/z90EYPi9rngT1xkTAcAC78/VKWwcWoOMAbkAyr0LhOGQ7+Mda RFftVoFQt9q13GeYcgPPLtLBOfLOmMF+CQrgs= DomainKey-Signature: a=rsa-sha1; c=nofws; d=gmail.com; s=gamma; h=mime-version:in-reply-to:references:date:message-id:subject:from:to :content-type; b=Rr0q2Xa2RgoT+XDm7cJxGvESjb7GlATeGV1A2VbV004MgmNSuihSJu6uIRRMwZzrKB DM3JUH/QV3c2R13lj+JwjfmcjUEdWYFjRUO9nhY0g5edRSFzJAIYezTrGE5tCXmQDawg ZEPfe9m9hkVTKoqVINNBoatNYiE0Opf8RVaAU= MIME-Version: 1.0 Received: by 10.216.3.3 with SMTP id 3mr13974628weg.57.1293235088725; Fri, 24 Dec 2010 15:58:08 -0800 (PST) Received: by 10.216.52.211 with HTTP; Fri, 24 Dec 2010 15:58:08 -0800 (PST) Received: by 10.216.52.211 with HTTP; Fri, 24 Dec 2010 15:58:08 -0800 (PST) In-Reply-To: References: <20101223174549.GM1656@chaosreigns.com> <1495036499-1293178428-cardhu_decombobulator_blackberry.rim.net-5901174-@b2.c7.bise7.blackberry> <20101224173542.GP1656@chaosreigns.com> <20101224184811.GR1656@chaosreigns.com> Date: Fri, 24 Dec 2010 13:58:08 -1000 Message-ID: Subject: Re: mass-check submissions Re: My attempt at re-calculating test scores From: "Warren Togami Jr." To: users@spamassassin.apache.org Content-Type: multipart/alternative; boundary=0016364d265b13185b049830c24f X-Virus-Checked: Checked by ClamAV on apache.org --0016364d265b13185b049830c24f Content-Type: text/plain; charset=UTF-8 I think what he is failing to understand is the scores are irrelevant, as the masscheck is only determining yes or no for each rule across a corpus. Also "current" is referring to the nightly masscheck snapshot of svn trunk including the latest rules. This does remind me however that there is a serious and confusing problem if people should be using --reuse or not. As it is now, it is misleading and broken for most people due to the chicken and egg problem of missing tags for newer DNSBL's. We should probably tell people to turn off --reuse unless they are sure they know what they are doing. Warren On Dec 24, 2010 1:05 PM, "John Hardin" wrote: --0016364d265b13185b049830c24f Content-Type: text/html; charset=UTF-8 Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable

I think what he is failing to understand is the scores are irrelevant, a= s the masscheck is only determining yes or no for each rule across a corpus= .=C2=A0 Also "current" is referring to the nightly masscheck snap= shot of svn trunk including the latest rules.

This does remind me however that there is a serious and confusing proble= m if people should be using --reuse or not.=C2=A0 As it is now, it is misle= ading and broken for most people due to the chicken and egg problem of miss= ing tags for newer DNSBL's.=C2=A0 We should probably tell people to tur= n off --reuse unless they are sure they know what they are doing.

Warren

On Dec 24, 2010 1:05 PM, "John Hardin"= <jhardin@impsec.org> wrote= :
--0016364d265b13185b049830c24f--