Return-Path: Delivered-To: apmail-spamassassin-users-archive@www.apache.org Received: (qmail 39946 invoked from network); 16 Dec 2010 08:32:57 -0000 Received: from unknown (HELO mail.apache.org) (140.211.11.3) by 140.211.11.9 with SMTP; 16 Dec 2010 08:32:57 -0000 Received: (qmail 1659 invoked by uid 500); 16 Dec 2010 08:32:54 -0000 Delivered-To: apmail-spamassassin-users-archive@spamassassin.apache.org Received: (qmail 1433 invoked by uid 500); 16 Dec 2010 08:32:54 -0000 Mailing-List: contact users-help@spamassassin.apache.org; run by ezmlm Precedence: bulk list-help: list-unsubscribe: List-Post: List-Id: Delivered-To: mailing list users@spamassassin.apache.org Received: (qmail 1426 invoked by uid 99); 16 Dec 2010 08:32:54 -0000 Received: from nike.apache.org (HELO nike.apache.org) (192.87.106.230) by apache.org (qpsmtpd/0.29) with ESMTP; Thu, 16 Dec 2010 08:32:54 +0000 X-ASF-Spam-Status: No, hits=-0.0 required=10.0 tests=SPF_HELO_PASS,SPF_PASS X-Spam-Check-By: apache.org Received-SPF: pass (nike.apache.org: domain of uhlar@fantomas.sk designates 195.168.3.66 as permitted sender) Received: from [195.168.3.66] (HELO fantomas.fantomas.sk) (195.168.3.66) by apache.org (qpsmtpd/0.29) with ESMTP; Thu, 16 Dec 2010 08:32:47 +0000 Received: from fantomas.fantomas.sk (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by fantomas.fantomas.sk (8.14.3/8.14.3/Debian-5+lenny1) with ESMTP id oBG8WQpB000907 for ; Thu, 16 Dec 2010 09:32:26 +0100 Received: (from uhlar@localhost) by fantomas.fantomas.sk (8.14.3/8.14.3/Submit) id oBG8WQb0000906 for users@spamassassin.apache.org; Thu, 16 Dec 2010 09:32:26 +0100 X-Authentication-Warning: fantomas.fantomas.sk: uhlar set sender to uhlar@fantomas.sk using -f Date: Thu, 16 Dec 2010 09:32:26 +0100 From: Matus UHLAR - fantomas To: users@spamassassin.apache.org Subject: Re: Additional sa-update channels Message-ID: <20101216083226.GC32657@fantomas.sk> Mail-Followup-To: users@spamassassin.apache.org References: <4D08F4A8.1030305@BUC.com> <4D090230.2040306@nl.rogers.com> MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii Content-Disposition: inline In-Reply-To: <4D090230.2040306@nl.rogers.com> User-Agent: Mutt/1.5.18 (2008-05-17) X-Virus-Checked: Checked by ClamAV on apache.org >> On 12/15/2010 11:57 AM, Andy Jezierski wrote: >>> Been away from the list for quite some time. Just updated SA from >>> 3.2.5 to 3.3.1. Have been trying to find a list of sa-update channels >>> that are still relevant but not with much success. >>> >>> Does anyone know is such a list exists, or if you know of which >>> additional channels can still be used. I know a lot of them have been >>> merged into SA and some are outdated and recommended not to be used. > On 15/12/2010 1:32 PM, Bowie Bailey wrote: >> All of the good SARE rules have been merged into SA. All of the SARE >> update channels should no longer be used (as the rules are no longer >> being updated). >> >> The best additional channel to use at the moment is the Sought ruleset. On 15.12.10 14:30, Lawrence @ Rogers wrote: > Have to disagree on the Sought rules. I've seen them give quite a few > false positives (mostly on e-mail notifications from social networks > Facebook and Twitter), and hit on hardly any spam at all. I have seen many correct hits on SOUGHT (on mail that would be a FN otherwise) and FPs are usually cut off quite fast. -- Matus UHLAR - fantomas, uhlar@fantomas.sk ; http://www.fantomas.sk/ Warning: I wish NOT to receive e-mail advertising to this address. Varovanie: na tuto adresu chcem NEDOSTAVAT akukolvek reklamnu postu. Linux IS user friendly, it's just selective who its friends are...