Return-Path: Delivered-To: apmail-spamassassin-users-archive@www.apache.org Received: (qmail 85757 invoked from network); 2 Nov 2010 21:13:04 -0000 Received: from unknown (HELO mail.apache.org) (140.211.11.3) by 140.211.11.9 with SMTP; 2 Nov 2010 21:13:04 -0000 Received: (qmail 59098 invoked by uid 500); 2 Nov 2010 21:13:33 -0000 Delivered-To: apmail-spamassassin-users-archive@spamassassin.apache.org Received: (qmail 59059 invoked by uid 500); 2 Nov 2010 21:13:33 -0000 Mailing-List: contact users-help@spamassassin.apache.org; run by ezmlm Precedence: bulk list-help: list-unsubscribe: List-Post: List-Id: Delivered-To: mailing list users@spamassassin.apache.org Received: (qmail 59050 invoked by uid 99); 2 Nov 2010 21:13:33 -0000 Received: from nike.apache.org (HELO nike.apache.org) (192.87.106.230) by apache.org (qpsmtpd/0.29) with ESMTP; Tue, 02 Nov 2010 21:13:33 +0000 X-ASF-Spam-Status: No, hits=-0.0 required=10.0 tests=SPF_PASS X-Spam-Check-By: apache.org Received-SPF: pass (nike.apache.org: domain of cconn@abacom.com designates 66.129.128.4 as permitted sender) Received: from [66.129.128.4] (HELO mrtg.abacom.com) (66.129.128.4) by apache.org (qpsmtpd/0.29) with ESMTP; Tue, 02 Nov 2010 21:13:24 +0000 Received: from [192.168.0.97] (gw-interne.b2b2c.ca [66.158.129.194]) (authenticated bits=0) by mrtg.abacom.com (8.12.11.20060308/8.12.8) with ESMTP id oA2LD1Md007326 (version=TLSv1/SSLv3 cipher=AES256-SHA bits=256 verify=NO); Tue, 2 Nov 2010 17:13:02 -0400 Message-ID: <4CD07EDF.1020301@abacom.com> Date: Tue, 02 Nov 2010 17:13:03 -0400 From: Chris Conn Organization: B2B2C.ca User-Agent: Mozilla/5.0 (Windows; U; Windows NT 6.1; en-US; rv:1.9.2.12) Gecko/20101027 Thunderbird/3.1.6 MIME-Version: 1.0 To: "Lawrence @ Rogers" CC: users@spamassassin.apache.org Subject: Re: comparing From and Reply-To: References: <4CD07C15.8010409@nl.rogers.com> In-Reply-To: <4CD07C15.8010409@nl.rogers.com> Content-Type: text/plain; charset=ISO-8859-1; format=flowed Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit X-Virus-Checked: Checked by ClamAV on apache.org On 2010-11-02 17:01, Lawrence @ Rogers wrote: > As a sort of follow up to my last message, I was wondering how > complicated it is to write a rule that would compare the From: and > Reply-To: headers, and set it to 0.001 or make it a meta rule that could > be used in conjunction with others? > > Would this plugin suffice? > > http://wiki.apache.org/spamassassin/FromNotReplyTo > > Regards, > Lawrence I use this plugin for precisely that. We have modified the plugin to match particular addresses in order to score highly for phishing and whatnot. Chris