spamassassin-users mailing list archives

Site index · List index
Message view « Date » · « Thread »
Top « Date » · « Thread »
From Marc Perkel <supp...@junkemailfilter.com>
Subject Re: SPF technical problems (was Re: email address forgery)
Date Sat, 20 Nov 2010 23:02:58 GMT


On 11/18/2010 9:55 AM, RW wrote:
> On Thu, 18 Nov 2010 16:00:48 +0100
> Benny Pedersen<me@junc.org>  wrote:
>
>> On tor 18 nov 2010 12:59:38 CET, Matus UHLAR - fantomas wrote
>>> On 16.11.10 07:48, Marc Perkel wrote:
>>>> Spammer can and do use SPF so it's not a good white list either.
>>>> If SPF is correct and the domain is in my white list then I'll
>>>> pass it as white.
>>> we call this "shitting into one's own mouth".
>> Marc have you seen spf scores in spamassassin ?
>>
>> why is spf_pass not giving -100 as default ?
> What he actually wrote was "If SPF is correct and the domain is in my
> white list" which is is equivalent to USER_IN_SPF_WHITELIST. That does
> score -100 and has no scatological implications.


Spammers can and do set SPF records too.

-- 
Marc Perkel - Sales/Support
support@junkemailfilter.com
http://www.junkemailfilter.com
Junk Email Filter dot com
415-992-3400


Mime
View raw message