Mailing-List: contact users-help@spamassassin.apache.org; run by ezmlm
Precedence: bulk
Received-SPF: pass (nike.apache.org: domain of lists@nabble.com designates
 216.139.236.158 as permitted sender)
Message-ID: <29223319.post@talk.nabble.com>
Date: Wed, 21 Jul 2010 01:55:56 -0700 (PDT)
From: Daniel Lemke <lemke@jam-software.com>
To: users@spamassassin.apache.org
Subject: Re: Does SpamAssassin perform tests/scans on attachments?
In-Reply-To: <20100721084650.GA13460@smtp.hege.li>
MIME-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii
Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit
References: <29222058.post@talk.nabble.com> <4C468649.8000005@ipinc.net>
 <29222150.post@talk.nabble.com> <29222479.post@talk.nabble.com>
 <20100721084650.GA13460@smtp.hege.li>


Henrik K wrote:
> 
> But make sure you have SA 3.3, you should use the time_limit [2] local.cf
> option. If you have latest SA and there are rules which "hang", you should
> identify them (can't remember the easiest way right now) and maybe post a
> bug.
> 

There wasn't a rule that actually "hang", it were just the regexes that
consumed such a large amount of scantime because of the size of the mail.

I've had a look on the logs, only two (spam) mails out of 20.000 that had a
size of more than 250kb, so I'm ok with that limit now :)

Daniel
-- 
View this message in context: http://old.nabble.com/Does-SpamAssassin-perform-tests-scans-on-attachments--tp29222058p29223319.html
Sent from the SpamAssassin - Users mailing list archive at Nabble.com.