Return-Path: Delivered-To: apmail-spamassassin-users-archive@www.apache.org Received: (qmail 13380 invoked from network); 27 Jun 2010 17:27:39 -0000 Received: from unknown (HELO mail.apache.org) (140.211.11.3) by 140.211.11.9 with SMTP; 27 Jun 2010 17:27:39 -0000 Received: (qmail 32480 invoked by uid 500); 27 Jun 2010 17:27:36 -0000 Delivered-To: apmail-spamassassin-users-archive@spamassassin.apache.org Received: (qmail 32433 invoked by uid 500); 27 Jun 2010 17:27:35 -0000 Mailing-List: contact users-help@spamassassin.apache.org; run by ezmlm Precedence: bulk list-help: list-unsubscribe: List-Post: List-Id: Delivered-To: mailing list users@spamassassin.apache.org Received: (qmail 32426 invoked by uid 99); 27 Jun 2010 17:27:35 -0000 Received: from nike.apache.org (HELO nike.apache.org) (192.87.106.230) by apache.org (qpsmtpd/0.29) with ESMTP; Sun, 27 Jun 2010 17:27:35 +0000 X-ASF-Spam-Status: No, hits=-0.7 required=10.0 tests=RCVD_IN_DNSWL_LOW,SPF_HELO_PASS,SPF_PASS X-Spam-Check-By: apache.org Received-SPF: pass (nike.apache.org: domain of danm@prime.gushi.org designates 72.9.101.130 as permitted sender) Received: from [72.9.101.130] (HELO prime.gushi.org) (72.9.101.130) by apache.org (qpsmtpd/0.29) with ESMTP; Sun, 27 Jun 2010 17:27:28 +0000 Received: from prime.gushi.org (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by prime.gushi.org (8.14.1/8.14.1) with ESMTP id o5RHR59f003701 (version=TLSv1/SSLv3 cipher=DHE-RSA-AES256-SHA bits=256 verify=NO) for ; Sun, 27 Jun 2010 13:27:06 -0400 (EDT) (envelope-from danm@prime.gushi.org) X-DKIM: Sendmail DKIM Filter v2.8.3 prime.gushi.org o5RHR59f003701 DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=simple/simple; d=prime.gushi.org; s=primegushiorg; t=1277662218; bh=tEy1lzWxWrC43GJ/E9V/ax+X0WtruadwA59unjIOTQ4=; h=Date:From:To:Subject:Message-ID:MIME-Version:Content-Type; b=WXjPzUxRK2aT4THjK2+OQv5tXBBk4QCL6mVa0Y/9e/zAmLOeyFkTZzU6yRiT2rktv lkRbRGZY6t8yYq8Qr8p8A== X-DomainKeys: Sendmail DomainKeys Filter v1.0.2 prime.gushi.org o5RHR59f003701 DomainKey-Signature: a=rsa-sha1; s=primegushiorg; d=prime.gushi.org; c=nofws; q=dns; h=received:date:from:to:subject:message-id:user-agent: x-openpgp-key-id:mime-version:content-type; b=McqsukfNL3M/ZR71klwQxcooZSgbwCY25boVnPDd9FrH7REldHF+WSxbqFXHnf87Z zbcrHbuidLa7MFEnlsxlA== Received: (from danm@localhost) by prime.gushi.org (8.14.1/8.14.1/Submit) id o5RHR4xw003699; Sun, 27 Jun 2010 13:27:04 -0400 (EDT) (envelope-from danm) Date: Sun, 27 Jun 2010 13:27:04 -0400 (EDT) From: "Dan Mahoney, System Admin" To: users@spamassassin.apache.org Subject: Does spamd support ipv6 yet? Message-ID: User-Agent: Alpine 2.00 (BSF 1167 2008-08-23) X-OpenPGP-Key-ID: 0x624BB249 MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: TEXT/PLAIN; format=flowed; charset=US-ASCII X-Greylist: Sender IP whitelisted, not delayed by milter-greylist-4.0.1 (prime.gushi.org [127.0.0.1]); Sun, 27 Jun 2010 14:10:19 -0400 (EDT) X-Virus-Checked: Checked by ClamAV on apache.org I previously asked this question and was told the best answer might be to wait for 3.3. Was there ever support ratified for ipv6 including proper -A ipv6 access lists, and proper ability to listen on both the ipv6 default and the v4 default at the same time, when specifying -i? I'm not sure which bugs to look at to ascertain this. -Dan -- --------Dan Mahoney-------- Techie, Sysadmin, WebGeek Gushi on efnet/undernet IRC ICQ: 13735144 AIM: LarpGM Site: http://www.gushi.org ---------------------------