Return-Path: Delivered-To: apmail-spamassassin-users-archive@www.apache.org Received: (qmail 72277 invoked from network); 4 Jun 2010 07:41:46 -0000 Received: from unknown (HELO mail.apache.org) (140.211.11.3) by 140.211.11.9 with SMTP; 4 Jun 2010 07:41:46 -0000 Received: (qmail 22105 invoked by uid 500); 4 Jun 2010 07:41:43 -0000 Delivered-To: apmail-spamassassin-users-archive@spamassassin.apache.org Received: (qmail 22029 invoked by uid 500); 4 Jun 2010 07:41:40 -0000 Mailing-List: contact users-help@spamassassin.apache.org; run by ezmlm Precedence: bulk list-help: list-unsubscribe: List-Post: List-Id: Delivered-To: mailing list users@spamassassin.apache.org Received: (qmail 22021 invoked by uid 99); 4 Jun 2010 07:41:39 -0000 Received: from athena.apache.org (HELO athena.apache.org) (140.211.11.136) by apache.org (qpsmtpd/0.29) with ESMTP; Fri, 04 Jun 2010 07:41:39 +0000 X-ASF-Spam-Status: No, hits=-0.0 required=10.0 tests=SPF_HELO_PASS,SPF_PASS X-Spam-Check-By: apache.org Received-SPF: pass (athena.apache.org: domain of robert@schetterer.org designates 212.52.224.25 as permitted sender) Received: from [212.52.224.25] (HELO postmailer.nci.de) (212.52.224.25) by apache.org (qpsmtpd/0.29) with ESMTP; Fri, 04 Jun 2010 07:41:33 +0000 Received: from [10.0.0.110] (host-88-217-137-181.customer.m-online.net [88.217.137.181]) (Authenticated sender: robert@schetterer.org) by postmailer.nci.de (Postfix) with ESMTPSA id 1D7FE260011 for ; Fri, 4 Jun 2010 09:41:10 +0200 (CEST) X-DomainKeys: Sendmail DomainKeys Filter v0.6.0 postmailer.nci.de 1D7FE260011 DomainKey-Signature: a=rsa-sha1; s=domkey; d=schetterer.org; c=nofws; q=dns; h=x-dkim:dkim-signature:message-id:date:from:user-agent: mime-version:to:subject:references:in-reply-to:content-transfer-encoding; b=Y8PCJ9Iw4OUmJ+yA1jDOYfAMOG5bhLfIwGFvMnJCBUNTzJhiAq0pbemDW7SUBU1Jv zWuhktNsxtHeqWJKIJdug== X-DKIM: Sendmail DKIM Filter v2.8.1 postmailer.nci.de 1D7FE260011 DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/simple; d=schetterer.org; s=mail; t=1275637271; bh=zVwFvnQnRjlNUTYC2hOLGEWdXYh6d+NdjK+DXwngn94=; h=Message-ID:Date:From:MIME-Version:To:Subject:References: In-Reply-To:Content-Transfer-Encoding; b=kbAJPfo3qZ8ns4DbOdjdPppM+s6HBnEg6ZGgqa1YYp+3mLR6/fSJNe7Uiezgp6fpT /Q7hLQyiPFjgH7t++nFqQ== Message-ID: <4C08AE16.1090406@schetterer.org> Date: Fri, 04 Jun 2010 09:41:10 +0200 From: Robert Schetterer User-Agent: Mozilla/5.0 (X11; U; Linux x86_64; de; rv:1.9.1.9) Gecko/20100317 SUSE/3.0.4-75.5 Lightning/1.0b2pre Thunderbird/3.0.4 MIME-Version: 1.0 To: users@spamassassin.apache.org Subject: Re: Problems with spamass-milter, postfix, spamassassin References: <4C07AFF2.9040800@imelaps.ee> <4C07BF72.2080507@vianet.ca> In-Reply-To: <4C07BF72.2080507@vianet.ca> Content-Type: text/plain; charset=ISO-8859-1 Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit X-Virus-Scanned: clamav-milter 0.96.1 at postmailer X-Virus-Status: Clean Am 03.06.2010 16:42, schrieb Kris Deugau: > Tarvo Kurm wrote: >> Mails coming in thru postfix+spamass-milter+spamassassin have >> drastically lower scores than those checked manually with spamassasin >> or spamc. Specifically, mails taking the milter path will not have >> RCVD_IN rules matched _almost_ never. I'm suspicious of the >> UNPARSABLE_RELAY match, but not sure what causes it. > > Milters typically see the message before any Received: headers are added > by the local MTA. As a result, the milter itself needs to add a > synthetic one that SA can use. > > Unfortunately, this synthetic header seems to be a lot harder to > generate than you might think. I've heard reports now and then for > several years now that spamass-milter still hasn't quite got this ironed > out. My own preferred milter, MIMEDefang, has also had intermittent > problems generating a correct Received: header to pass to SA. > > The fact that RBL rules are not firing, and you're getting > UNPARSEABLE_RELAY, says to me that *something* is wrong with the > generated header you're getting. > > Check and see if there's a way you can get spamass-milter to keep the > message with the generated header somewhere so you can compare what's > actually generated with the live header Postfix adds later, and which > you see in your mailbox. > >> There has been a bug in spamass-milter which might or might not be >> relevant, but as far as i can see, it's been fixed in the debian >> package... >> (See http://bugs.debian.org/cgi-bin/bugreport.cgi?bug=510665 ) > > Fixed in the version you're running, or just unstable/testing? > > -kgd whatever, i am using spamass-milter since years without any trouble with local files, with mysql on test bed also no errors perhaps check all config of all parts -- Best Regards MfG Robert Schetterer Germany/Munich/Bavaria