Return-Path: Delivered-To: apmail-spamassassin-users-archive@www.apache.org Received: (qmail 24062 invoked from network); 5 May 2010 13:23:32 -0000 Received: from unknown (HELO mail.apache.org) (140.211.11.3) by 140.211.11.9 with SMTP; 5 May 2010 13:23:32 -0000 Received: (qmail 81745 invoked by uid 500); 5 May 2010 13:23:28 -0000 Delivered-To: apmail-spamassassin-users-archive@spamassassin.apache.org Received: (qmail 81721 invoked by uid 500); 5 May 2010 13:23:28 -0000 Mailing-List: contact users-help@spamassassin.apache.org; run by ezmlm Precedence: bulk list-help: list-unsubscribe: List-Post: List-Id: Delivered-To: mailing list users@spamassassin.apache.org Received: (qmail 81714 invoked by uid 99); 5 May 2010 13:23:28 -0000 Received: from nike.apache.org (HELO nike.apache.org) (192.87.106.230) by apache.org (qpsmtpd/0.29) with ESMTP; Wed, 05 May 2010 13:23:28 +0000 X-ASF-Spam-Status: No, hits=2.2 required=10.0 tests=FREEMAIL_ENVFROM_END_DIGIT,FREEMAIL_FROM,RCVD_IN_DNSWL_NONE,SPF_PASS X-Spam-Check-By: apache.org Received-SPF: pass (nike.apache.org: local policy) Received: from [77.238.184.69] (HELO smtp138.mail.ukl.yahoo.com) (77.238.184.69) by apache.org (qpsmtpd/0.29) with SMTP; Wed, 05 May 2010 13:23:22 +0000 Received: (qmail 81058 invoked from network); 5 May 2010 13:23:01 -0000 DomainKey-Signature: a=rsa-sha1; q=dns; c=nofws; s=s1024; d=yahoo.co.uk; h=Received:X-Yahoo-SMTP:X-YMail-OSG:X-Yahoo-Newman-Property:From:To:References:In-Reply-To:Subject:Date:Message-ID:MIME-Version:Content-Type:Content-Transfer-Encoding:X-Mailer:Thread-Index:Content-Language; b=PRnu3izMMqVabeVJzGL6nc254Iow5FyiA2e13vPw+LBUdbC3NzP9K7eay4fc62B1sTVlgWNs86bgEoQeqzmAYn33Pvpgji2VgbVUBxOW1hnhVaKta+Wo40CN9qGcLlYP+llFBBQrXaUd/2ONl/DSeHw6xRvyN9R90V/QdDof8To= ; Received: from (batpower83@93.91.200.194 with login) by smtp138.mail.ukl.yahoo.com with SMTP; 05 May 2010 13:23:00 +0000 GMT X-Yahoo-SMTP: 0Chs54CswBBRzAb4T7.hTGMh8Cc3M88- X-YMail-OSG: YhUvJiUVM1mHg5qTkltGsAs68DbRpnQ4m5VinKnUJTsoysusOjpVlijGUigwGLu5eYgeTTAUQZMByIVNR7lX_ppoOJlsM1wDKOORTSbTCnbJt52_26BoJLTTjeYt5InYXdT84HyP4XUqSiAHGO_QDbdi6QJjd0xh_YdWyvRUeF_DEDEarfCRfw_mC1SgfIMskm.swHqFLraS9zYnyMSZqbZoxHFMVRpCMe56aPMb0EZBr2vll_k8b499kSpkfA-- X-Yahoo-Newman-Property: ymail-3 From: "Alans" To: "'Frank Heydlauf'" , References: <03cc01caec26$d0d65420$7282fc60$@co.uk> <1273061380.18136.92.camel@darkstar.netcore.co.in> <000b01caec4f$ce058440$6a108cc0$@co.uk> <20100505131019.GA70673@velo.LF.net> In-Reply-To: <20100505131019.GA70673@velo.LF.net> Subject: RE: Scanning Outbound emails Date: Wed, 5 May 2010 16:22:54 +0300 Message-ID: <001601caec56$15aecbc0$410c6340$@co.uk> MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset="us-ascii" Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit X-Mailer: Microsoft Office Outlook 12.0 Thread-Index: AcrsVGF1GIisezzbTYy1stMzBkt+XgAAaGXg Content-Language: en-us X-Virus-Checked: Checked by ClamAV on apache.org Frank, Bernd, Thank you all. Regards, Alans -----Original Message----- From: Frank Heydlauf [mailto:fh-sa2004@lf.net] Sent: Wednesday, May 05, 2010 4:10 PM To: users@spamassassin.apache.org Subject: Re: Scanning Outbound emails Hi, On Wed, May 05, 2010 at 03:38:01PM +0300, Alans wrote: ... > We are about to close port 25 and tell customers to switch to our smtp relay > and scan it with spamassasin (I still don't know if possible or no!). As Bernd Petrovitsch already told you: Yes, that's possible. To close port 25 is a good idea. Use 587 with smtp-auth instead. > We want to reject all spam emails and send notification back to sender about > his/her activity. That part of the job is for your MTA, not for spamassassin. -- Regards Frank __________ NOD32 5087 (20100505) Information __________ This message was checked by NOD32 antivirus system. http://www.eset.com