spamassassin-users mailing list archives

Site index · List index
Message view « Date » · « Thread »
Top « Date » · « Thread »
From RW <rwmailli...@googlemail.com>
Subject Re: protocol is caSE sensitive, but should not be
Date Wed, 26 May 2010 17:39:53 GMT
On Tue, 25 May 2010 22:01:12 +0200
Benny Pedersen <me@junc.org> wrote:

> On Tue 25 May 2010 08:38:29 PM CEST, Karsten Br├Ąckelmann wrote
> 
> > On Tue, 2010-05-25 at 14:20 +0200, Benny Pedersen wrote:
> >> i see spam mails that using Http://example.com
> >
> > Yes, it is a known issue. Fixed in SVN already, and will be shipped
> > with the next release 3.3.2.
> 
> super
> 
> # save rule as 99_local_bugs_331.cf
> # SA = 3.3.1
> if (version == 3.003001)
>      uri __PROTOCOL_OK m{^https?://\w+}
>      meta PROTOCOL_FIX (!__PROTOCOL_OK)
>      describe PROTOCOL_FIX protocol in uri is not lowercase
>      score PROTOCOL_FIX 5.0
> endif # sa 3.3.1 only i hope
> 
> above rule is a imidate fix until 3.3.2, works for me

IMO something like this should be added via sa-update and left there as
long as spammers are doing this - not just until 3.3.2 is released.

Mime
View raw message