Mailing list archives

Site index · List index
Message view « Date » · « Thread »
Top « Date » · « Thread »
From Justin Mason <..@jmason.org>
Subject Re: [sa] Re: FH_DATE_PAST_20XX
Date Fri, 01 Jan 2010 21:04:34 GMT
Damn -- mea culpa.  When we fixed the bug in SVN trunk in bug 5852, I
should have immediately backported it to the 3.2.x sa-update channel
when I commited that patch, but I didn't.

It's now fixed in updates, but that won't help the admins who've been
paged to deal with high FP rates on a holiday.  :(  Sorry folks...

--j.

On Fri, Jan 1, 2010 at 19:01, Martin Gregorie <martin@gregorie.org> wrote:
> On Fri, 2010-01-01 at 10:04 -0500, Thomas Harold wrote:
>> On 1/1/2010 9:59 AM, Frank DeChellis DSL wrote:
>> > would commenting out FH_DATE_PAST_20XX in 72_active.cf help until it's
>> > fixed?
>> >
>>
>> My temporary fix was to override the score and set it to 0.001 in SA's
>> local.cf file.
>>
> Mine was to edit the regex in the latest sa_updates ruleset. I simply
> made a 1 character edit to change the 3rd digit pattern to [2-9] from
> [1-9]. I tested the change, natch.
>
>> # Turn down score on broken date testing rule
>> score FH_DATE_PAST_20XX 0.001
>>
> I deliberately broke the "don't edit the default or sa_update ruleset"
> injunction so that my patch will vanish when the official update
> arrives. This means that I don't have to remember to undo any temporary
> changes.
>
> Martin
>
>
>



-- 
--j.

Mime
View raw message