spamassassin-users mailing list archives

Site index · List index
Message view « Date » · « Thread »
Top « Date » · « Thread »
From "Daryl C. W. O'Shea" <>
Subject Re: [sa] Re: habeas - tainted white list
Date Fri, 18 Dec 2009 22:22:36 GMT
On 18/12/2009 4:46 PM, Charles Gregory wrote:
> On Fri, 18 Dec 2009, jdow wrote:
>> I suppose it's not a whole lot of bother to change the 3.2 scores.
>> But, people who feel they have been bitten with a HABEAS score have
>> probably already overridden them.
> Again, I make a note that my concern is for the thousands who install a
> 'pre-canned' Spamassassin install, with a wrapper to handle what happens
> to the messages, etc, etc. If you feel a slight chill at the notion of
> people operating mail servers with so little knowledge, I'm right there
> with you, but I *was* one of these people a few years ago. Stumbling and
> learning. Trial by fire. Fun way to learn. :)

Interestingly this is one of the reasons why we err on the side of
not-tagging mail.


View raw message