spamassassin-users mailing list archives

Site index · List index
Message view « Date » · « Thread »
Top « Date » · « Thread »
From Michelle Konzack <linux4miche...@tamay-dogan.net>
Subject Re: HABEAS_ACCREDITED SPAMMER
Date Wed, 25 Nov 2009 17:16:25 GMT
Am 2009-11-23 17:08:11, schrieb LuKreme:
> On Nov 23, 2009, at 7:39, Matus UHLAR - fantomas <uhlar@fantomas.sk>
> wrote:
> 
> >Yes, why to differ between non-abusing and abusing marketers...
> 
> We've been through this before. On my mail, habeas is a very strong
> indicator of spam. It does not appear in legitimate mail.

Here too.

> I don't know who these legitimate marketers are, but I don't feel
> I'm missing anything.

I do not get very much HABEAS spam, but arround 2000  per  year.  Not  a
singel one was legitimate.  What is th difference between a spamer and a
"legitimate" marketer if I even do not know both?

By definition:  Both are non-welcome @me.

Thanks, Greetings and nice Day/Evening
    Michelle Konzack
    Systemadministrator
    Tamay Dogan Network
    Debian GNU/Linux Consultant

-- 
Linux-User #280138 with the Linux Counter, http://counter.li.org/
##################### Debian GNU/Linux Consultant #####################
<http://www.tamay-dogan.net/>                 Michelle Konzack
<http://www.can4linux.org/>                   Apt. 917
<http://www.flexray4linux.org/>               50, rue de Soultz
Jabber linux4michelle@jabber.ccc.de           67100 Strabourg/France
IRC    #Debian (irc.icq.com)                  Tel. DE: +49 177 9351947
ICQ    #328449886                             Tel. FR: +33  6  61925193

Mime
View raw message