Return-Path: Delivered-To: apmail-spamassassin-users-archive@www.apache.org Received: (qmail 62627 invoked from network); 16 Oct 2009 20:09:39 -0000 Received: from hermes.apache.org (HELO mail.apache.org) (140.211.11.3) by minotaur.apache.org with SMTP; 16 Oct 2009 20:09:39 -0000 Received: (qmail 17297 invoked by uid 500); 16 Oct 2009 20:09:35 -0000 Delivered-To: apmail-spamassassin-users-archive@spamassassin.apache.org Received: (qmail 17274 invoked by uid 500); 16 Oct 2009 20:09:35 -0000 Mailing-List: contact users-help@spamassassin.apache.org; run by ezmlm Precedence: bulk list-help: list-unsubscribe: List-Post: List-Id: Delivered-To: mailing list users@spamassassin.apache.org Received: (qmail 17266 invoked by uid 99); 16 Oct 2009 20:09:35 -0000 Received: from nike.apache.org (HELO nike.apache.org) (192.87.106.230) by apache.org (qpsmtpd/0.29) with ESMTP; Fri, 16 Oct 2009 20:09:35 +0000 X-ASF-Spam-Status: No, hits=1.2 required=10.0 tests=SPF_NEUTRAL X-Spam-Check-By: apache.org Received-SPF: neutral (nike.apache.org: local policy) Received: from [72.14.220.158] (HELO fg-out-1718.google.com) (72.14.220.158) by apache.org (qpsmtpd/0.29) with ESMTP; Fri, 16 Oct 2009 20:09:24 +0000 Received: by fg-out-1718.google.com with SMTP id 16so1214268fgg.1 for ; Fri, 16 Oct 2009 13:09:03 -0700 (PDT) Received: by 10.86.170.22 with SMTP id s22mr1403696fge.37.1255723743885; Fri, 16 Oct 2009 13:09:03 -0700 (PDT) Received: from verleihnix.local ([81.62.86.207]) by mx.google.com with ESMTPS id d4sm2808463fga.6.2009.10.16.13.09.02 (version=TLSv1/SSLv3 cipher=RC4-MD5); Fri, 16 Oct 2009 13:09:03 -0700 (PDT) Message-ID: <4AD8D2DE.8070509@leisi.net> Date: Fri, 16 Oct 2009 22:09:02 +0200 From: Matthias Leisi User-Agent: Mozilla/5.0 (Macintosh; U; Intel Mac OS X; de; rv:1.8.1.23) Gecko/20090812 Thunderbird/2.0.0.23 Mnenhy/0.7.5.0 MIME-Version: 1.0 To: "users@spamassassin.apache.org" Subject: Re: Constant Contact References: <4AD8A427.9020707@khopis.com> <4AD8A62A.100@invaluement.com> <6B08AFA349784BB7A9CF59CDBABC5BEE@msys1> <4AD8B64D.70202@invaluement.com> In-Reply-To: <4AD8B64D.70202@invaluement.com> Content-Type: text/plain; charset=ISO-8859-1 Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit X-Virus-Checked: Checked by ClamAV on apache.org Rob McEwen schrieb: > Just what I said. If an IP whitelist cause too many spams to get a "free > pass", then instead of using that whitelist as a free pass to the > inbox... instead... use it to bypass all checking of the sender IPs > against blacklists, but still do content spam filtering on the message. That's the recommended usage for dnswl.org data since it's beginning: skip grey/blacklisting for all trust levels, but only bypass spamfilter for medium/high trust levels (and never bypass virus filtering, if you have Windows users). -- Matthias