spamassassin-users mailing list archives

Site index · List index
Message view « Date » · « Thread »
Top « Date » · « Thread »
From Rick Knight <rick_kni...@rlknight.com>
Subject Re: DCCPROC and / or DCCIFD
Date Wed, 14 Oct 2009 17:32:09 GMT
Jari Fredriksson wrote:
>
>
> 14.10.2009 19:52, Rick Knight kirjoitti:
>> Eduardo Casarero wrote:
>>>
>>>
>>> 2009/10/14 Rick Knight <rick_knight@rlknight.com
>>> <mailto:rick_knight@rlknight.com>>
>>>
>>> With the help of people here, I have gotten DCCIFD working. Now I
>>> have another question. Should I use DCCIFD with DCCPROC or instead
>>> of DCCPROC? Can they work together or does one take precedence?
>>>
>>> Thanks,
>>> Rick
>>>
>>>
>>> you have to add a dccifd_home or something like that in SA config, and
>>> SA will use the daemon automatically.
>>>
>> Eduardo, thanks for your reply.
>>
>> I have
>> DCC_HOM /var/dcc
>> DCC_DCCIFD_PATH /var/dcc/dccifd
>> DCC_PATH /usr/bin/dccproc
>>
>> in my local.cf and they are both available. My question is, should I use
>> both DCCPROC and DCCIFD together or should I be using just one of them.
>>
>> Thanks,
>> Rick
>>
>
> SpamAssassin uses dccifd if it is available. dccproc is a backup, used
> only when the daemonised version is not available.
>
> You can and should configure them both, but SA only uses one of them.
>
> -- 
> http://www.iki.fi/jarif/
>
> The human race is a race of cowards; and I am not only marching in that
> procession but carrying a banner.
>         -- Mark Twain
Jari, Stefan, thanks for your replies. I guess my system is good then. 
Since earlier this week when I got Razor2 and DCC working my spam had 
dropped to just about nothing. I almost feel lonely without, almost.

Thanks everyone,
Rick


Mime
View raw message