spamassassin-users mailing list archives

Site index · List index
Message view « Date » · « Thread »
Top « Date » · « Thread »
From "Michael Hutchinson" <mhutchin...@manux.co.nz>
Subject RE: antispam comparison by virus bulletin
Date Sun, 06 Sep 2009 23:27:10 GMT
> -----Original Message-----
> From: mouss [mailto:mouss@ml.netoyen.net]
> Sent: Monday, 7 September 2009 9:59 a.m.
> To: Justin Mason
> Cc: users@spamassassin.apache.org
> Subject: Re: antispam comparison by virus bulletin
> 
> Justin Mason a écrit :
> > In fairness, they got in touch to ask for help in setting up a more
> > recent SA, but none of us (ie the PMC) had the spare cycles to help
> > out.  Comparative third-party tests like this always take a lot of
> > hand-holding.  We don't have the same kind of marketing budget as the
> > commercial companies, needless to say.
> >
> > OTOH, I think that McAfee's Email & Web Security Appliance runs on
> > SpamAssassin, or at least it did when I worked there ;)
> >
> 
> they acquired Secure Computing. so I'd say the test involved what was
> called Ironmail. Did Ironmail use SA?


They probably used McAfee SpamAssassin. Other Net-App kit of theirs certainly does:

http://www.mcafee.com/uk/local_content/datasheets/ds_spamkiller_appliances.pdf

I'd say it is probable that McAfee use SpamAssassin in every one of their Anti-Spam devices/software
products. It certainly wouldn't be surprising. When we had errors come from some of their
A/V+AntiSpam products, the existence of Spamassassin "under-the-hood" became apparent (especially
when it moans about not being able to load a 20_something_or_other.cf file :-)

Cheers,
Mike

Mime
View raw message