spamassassin-users mailing list archives: May 2009

Site index · List index
Message list1 · 2 · 3 · 4 · Next »Thread · Author · Date
Re: Almost no score
Chris   Re: Almost no score Fri, 01 May, 00:34
Jean-Paul Natola     RE: Almost no score Fri, 01 May, 15:03
Matus UHLAR - fantomas     Re: Almost no score Sun, 03 May, 17:12
Adam Katz   Re: Almost no score Fri, 01 May, 00:47
LuKreme     Re: Almost no score Fri, 01 May, 02:02
Charles Gregory       Re: Almost no score Fri, 01 May, 14:52
Raymond Dijkxhoorn   Re: Almost no score Fri, 01 May, 09:10
John Hardin     Re: Almost no score Fri, 01 May, 16:33
John Hardin     Re: Almost no score Fri, 01 May, 16:42
Adam Katz       Re: [SA] Almost no score Fri, 01 May, 18:04
Martin Gregorie         Re: [SA] Almost no score Fri, 01 May, 18:26
LuKreme         Re: Almost no score Fri, 01 May, 20:20
Adam Katz           Re: Almost no score Sat, 02 May, 06:03
Charles Gregory   Re: Almost no score Fri, 01 May, 14:48
Craig     Re: Almost no score Fri, 01 May, 15:16
Jeff Mincy     Re: Almost no score Fri, 01 May, 15:52
LuKreme     Re: Almost no score Fri, 01 May, 19:59
Ned Slider   Re: Almost no score Fri, 01 May, 22:56
John Hardin     Re: Almost no score Fri, 01 May, 23:09
Ned Slider       Re: Almost no score Fri, 01 May, 23:24
Re: Bombed by PNG spam and spamassassin say its HAM <argh>
Bob Proulx   Re: Bombed by PNG spam and spamassassin say its HAM <argh> Fri, 01 May, 03:41
Dave Funk     Re: Bombed by PNG spam and spamassassin say its HAM <argh> Fri, 01 May, 04:26
Bob Proulx       Re: Bombed by PNG spam and spamassassin say its HAM <argh> Fri, 01 May, 16:09
Michelle Konzack     Re: Re: Bombed by PNG spam and spamassassin say its HAM <argh> Fri, 01 May, 17:34
Benny Pedersen       Re: Re: Bombed by PNG spam and spamassassin say its HAM <argh> Sat, 02 May, 17:41
Michelle Konzack         Re: Re: Re: Bombed by PNG spam and spamassassin say its HAM <argh> Sat, 02 May, 18:40
fatuglymoomoo   Re: Bombed by PNG spam and spamassassin say its HAM <argh> Mon, 18 May, 23:53
John Hardin     Re: Bombed by PNG spam and spamassassin say its HAM <argh> Tue, 19 May, 00:01
Karsten Bräckelmann       Re: Bombed by PNG spam and spamassassin say its HAM <argh> Tue, 19 May, 00:45
LuKreme         Re: Bombed by PNG spam and spamassassin say its HAM <argh> Tue, 19 May, 03:15
Re: sa with spamass-milter UNPARSEABLE_RELAY problem - fixed
mark   Re: sa with spamass-milter UNPARSEABLE_RELAY problem - fixed Fri, 01 May, 04:18
Dave Funk     Re: sa with spamass-milter UNPARSEABLE_RELAY problem - fixed Fri, 01 May, 04:54
dave_c00 ifspamh error logs Fri, 01 May, 08:38
Karsten Bräckelmann   Re: ifspamh error logs Fri, 01 May, 16:14
vibi spamassassin block *.png Fri, 01 May, 09:56
Dennis Davis   Re: spamassassin block *.png Fri, 01 May, 11:10
vibi     Re: spamassassin block *.png Fri, 01 May, 13:37
Matus UHLAR - fantomas   Re: spamassassin block *.png Sat, 02 May, 22:14
Michelle Konzack   Re: spamassassin block *.png Sat, 02 May, 23:28
John Hardin     Re: spamassassin block *.png Sun, 03 May, 03:46
Bob Proulx       Re: spamassassin block *.png Sun, 03 May, 07:12
Michelle Konzack       Re: spamassassin block *.png Mon, 04 May, 22:34
RE: my emailBL is live!
Jeff Moss   RE: my emailBL is live! Fri, 01 May, 12:43
Adam Katz     emailBL code Fri, 01 May, 13:56
Yet Another Ninja       Re: emailBL code Fri, 01 May, 14:12
Mike Cardwell         Re: emailBL code Fri, 01 May, 14:25
Adam Katz           Re: emailBL code Fri, 01 May, 14:46
John Hardin             Re: emailBL code Fri, 01 May, 16:37
Adam Katz               Re: [SA] emailBL code Fri, 01 May, 17:13
John Hardin                 Re: [SA] emailBL code Fri, 01 May, 17:37
Jesse Thompson               Re: emailBL code Fri, 01 May, 19:36
Adam Katz                 Re: emailBL code Sat, 02 May, 06:24
Henrik K                 Re: emailBL code Sat, 02 May, 07:23
Jesse Thompson         Re: emailBL code Fri, 01 May, 14:52
Yet Another Ninja           Re: emailBL code Fri, 01 May, 15:24
John Hardin             Re: emailBL code Fri, 01 May, 16:44
Mandy           Re: emailBL code Fri, 01 May, 20:58
Adam Katz             Re: emailBL code Fri, 01 May, 22:37
Adam Katz               Re: emailBL code Sat, 02 May, 06:43
Mandy               Re: emailBL code Mon, 04 May, 16:21
Adam Katz                 Anti-phishing outside of just detection Mon, 04 May, 17:03
Re: 'anti' AWL
Charles Gregory   Re: 'anti' AWL Fri, 01 May, 14:45
James Wilkinson     Re: 'anti' AWL Sat, 02 May, 19:05
Gene Heskett Looks like sa-learn --spam troubles Fri, 01 May, 15:23
Theo Van Dinter   Re: Looks like sa-learn --spam troubles Fri, 01 May, 15:57
Gene Heskett     Re: Looks like sa-learn --spam troubles Fri, 01 May, 20:52
Gene Heskett     Re: Looks like sa-learn --spam troubles Fri, 01 May, 21:34
Karsten Bräckelmann   Re: Looks like sa-learn --spam troubles Fri, 01 May, 16:02
Gene Heskett     Re: Looks like sa-learn --spam troubles Fri, 01 May, 21:38
jason_quick Virtual Postfix Users move SPAM to .Junk Fri, 01 May, 17:23
Evan Platt   Re: Virtual Postfix Users move SPAM to .Junk Fri, 01 May, 17:39
John Hardin   Re: Virtual Postfix Users move SPAM to .Junk Fri, 01 May, 17:40
John Hardin     Re: Virtual Postfix Users move SPAM to .Junk Fri, 01 May, 17:46
Dave Walker   Re: Virtual Postfix Users move SPAM to .Junk Fri, 01 May, 17:40
LuKreme   Re: Virtual Postfix Users move SPAM to .Junk Fri, 01 May, 20:29
mouss   Re: Virtual Postfix Users move SPAM to .Junk Fri, 01 May, 20:36
Benny Pedersen   Re: Virtual Postfix Users move SPAM to .Junk Sat, 02 May, 17:37
jason_quick     Re: Virtual Postfix Users move SPAM to .Junk Mon, 04 May, 02:07
Adam Katz       Re: [SA] Virtual Postfix Users move SPAM to .Junk Mon, 04 May, 02:26
mouss         Re: [SA] Virtual Postfix Users move SPAM to .Junk Mon, 04 May, 20:44
Re: Image spam and failing rule
Charles Gregory   Re: Image spam and failing rule Sat, 02 May, 12:38
James Wilkinson     Re: Image spam and failing rule Sat, 02 May, 18:21
Micah Anderson Local rules math problem Sat, 02 May, 15:27
RW   Re: Local rules math problem Sat, 02 May, 15:53
RW     Re: Local rules math problem Sat, 02 May, 17:11
mouss   Re: Local rules math problem Sun, 03 May, 13:33
Micah Anderson bayes training doesn't seem to have any affect Sat, 02 May, 15:28
Dave Walker   Re: bayes training doesn't seem to have any affect Sat, 02 May, 18:15
Micah Anderson     Re: bayes training doesn't seem to have any affect Mon, 04 May, 06:02
Adam Katz       Re: bayes training doesn't seem to have any affect Mon, 04 May, 14:28
Micah Anderson         Re: bayes training doesn't seem to have any affect Tue, 05 May, 21:40
Theo Van Dinter           Re: bayes training doesn't seem to have any affect Tue, 05 May, 22:40
Karsten Bräckelmann       Re: bayes training doesn't seem to have any affect Mon, 04 May, 23:17
Micah Anderson         Re: bayes training doesn't seem to have any affect Tue, 05 May, 21:44
Gene Heskett Restarting bayes Sat, 02 May, 18:34
Theo Van Dinter   Re: Restarting bayes Sat, 02 May, 19:30
Gene Heskett     Re: Restarting bayes Sat, 02 May, 19:57
Gene Heskett     Re: Restarting bayes Sat, 02 May, 21:10
Gene Heskett       Re: Restarting bayes Sun, 03 May, 14:01
Michael Monnerie False positive with FRT_VALIUM1 Sun, 03 May, 01:15
Benny Pedersen   Re: False positive with FRT_VALIUM1 Sun, 03 May, 01:40
Michael Monnerie     Re: False positive with FRT_VALIUM1 Mon, 04 May, 05:47
John Hardin   Re: False positive with FRT_VALIUM1 Sun, 03 May, 04:04
Michael Monnerie   Re: False positive with FRT_VALIUM1 Mon, 04 May, 05:58
Raymond Dijkxhoorn     Re: False positive with FRT_VALIUM1 Mon, 04 May, 06:03
Michael Monnerie       Re: False positive with FRT_VALIUM1 Mon, 04 May, 09:19
Justin Mason         Re: False positive with FRT_VALIUM1 Mon, 04 May, 13:56
Michael Monnerie           Re: False positive with FRT_VALIUM1 Mon, 04 May, 18:51
John Hardin             Re: False positive with FRT_VALIUM1 Mon, 04 May, 19:00
Justin Mason               Re: False positive with FRT_VALIUM1 Mon, 04 May, 19:17
Re: emailBL
mouss   Re: emailBL Sun, 03 May, 01:19
Adam Katz     Re: emailBL Sun, 03 May, 02:14
mouss   Re: 419 emailBL? Sun, 03 May, 01:40
Henrik K     Re: 419 emailBL? Sun, 03 May, 08:02
mouss       Re: 419 emailBL? Sun, 03 May, 13:14
Henrik K         Re: 419 emailBL? Sun, 03 May, 13:58
mouss           Re: 419 emailBL? Sun, 03 May, 16:25
Benny Pedersen             Re: 419 emailBL? Sun, 03 May, 16:42
mouss               Re: 419 emailBL? Sun, 03 May, 19:53
Henrik K             Re: 419 emailBL? Mon, 04 May, 03:38
mouss               Re: 419 emailBL? Mon, 04 May, 20:51
Henrik K                 Re: 419 emailBL? Tue, 05 May, 03:59
Mike Cardwell     Re: 419 emailBL? Sun, 03 May, 08:17
Chris Can't locate File/Scan/ClamAV.pm Sun, 03 May, 16:05
Theo Van Dinter   Re: Can't locate File/Scan/ClamAV.pm Sun, 03 May, 17:39
Chris     Re: Can't locate File/Scan/ClamAV.pm Sun, 03 May, 20:05
Re: Spam from windows live
Magnus Holmgren   Re: Spam from windows live Sun, 03 May, 18:48
RW     Re: Spam from windows live Mon, 04 May, 16:12
Karsten Bräckelmann       Re: Spam from windows live Mon, 04 May, 17:20
Theo Van Dinter         Re: Spam from windows live Mon, 04 May, 19:49
Karsten Bräckelmann           Re: Spam from windows live Mon, 04 May, 20:38
RW             Re: Spam from windows live Mon, 04 May, 21:09
Karsten Bräckelmann               Re: Spam from windows live Mon, 04 May, 21:55
Theo Van Dinter             Re: Spam from windows live Mon, 04 May, 21:18
Karsten Bräckelmann               Re: Spam from windows live Mon, 04 May, 22:21
Adam Katz Properly integrating clamAV into SpamAssassin Sun, 03 May, 22:47
Brent Kennedy   RE: Properly integrating clamAV into SpamAssassin Mon, 04 May, 00:06
Adam Katz     Re: Properly integrating clamAV into SpamAssassin Mon, 04 May, 01:50
Matus UHLAR - fantomas       Re: Properly integrating clamAV into SpamAssassin Mon, 04 May, 14:26
Adam Katz         Re: Properly integrating clamAV into SpamAssassin Mon, 04 May, 15:05
Matus UHLAR - fantomas           Re: Properly integrating clamAV into SpamAssassin Mon, 04 May, 15:20
Henrik K   Re: Properly integrating clamAV into SpamAssassin Mon, 04 May, 04:01
Jeff Mincy   Re: Properly integrating clamAV into SpamAssassin Mon, 04 May, 14:41
Henrik K     Re: Properly integrating clamAV into SpamAssassin Mon, 04 May, 15:01
Jodizzz The weirdest problem I have ever met Dear all, Please help me with this very weird problem. I have a client with this user who's is suddenly having a problem sending out emails. When I checked the logs, the email is stopped by qmailscanner with a very high spam rating. SA:SPAM-DELETE:RC:0(xxx.xx.xxx.xxx):SA:1(1528.3/5.5) He couldn't sent to anyone at all. Every email was stopped by qmail-scanner. The diagnostics I have done (1) Set up the same email account on another computer in the same LAN. - Problem still exists on this other computer (2) Set up another email account on this user's computer - This other email account can send out with no problem. (3) Got him to use roundcube webmail to send email out - No problem sending (4) I set up his email account on my computer which is outside of their LAN - No problem sending. (5) Put his email address in whitelist at /etc/mail/spamassassin/local.cf - problem still exists. Any idea where else I can check? Is there any way to know why anti-spam is blocking? Thanks a lot. Edit/Delete Message Reply With Quote Multi-Quote This Message Mon, 04 May, 04:55
Evan Platt   Re: The weirdest problem I have ever met <SNIP> Mon, 04 May, 05:07
John Hardin   Re: The weirdest problem I have ever met Dear all, Please help me with this very weird problem. I have a client with this user who's is suddenly having a problem sending out emails. When I checked the logs, the email is stopped by qmailscan Mon, 04 May, 13:52
Charles Gregory     Re: [sa] Re: The weirdest problem ..... Mon, 04 May, 14:44
Karsten Bräckelmann       Re: [sa] Re: The weirdest problem ..... Mon, 04 May, 16:00
Charles Gregory         Re: [sa] Re: The weirdest problem ..... Mon, 04 May, 16:16
Theo Van Dinter           Re: [sa] Re: The weirdest problem ..... Mon, 04 May, 16:45
Adam Katz             Re: The weirdest problem Mon, 04 May, 17:27
Theo Van Dinter               Re: The weirdest problem Mon, 04 May, 19:51
Karsten Bräckelmann           Re: [sa] Re: The weirdest problem ..... Mon, 04 May, 16:52
Charles Gregory             Re: The weirdest problem ..... Mon, 04 May, 18:45
Jodizzz         Re: [sa] Re: The weirdest problem ..... Tue, 05 May, 05:13
RobertH           RE: [sa] Re: The weirdest problem ..... Tue, 05 May, 05:54
Jodizzz             RE: [sa] Re: The weirdest problem ..... Tue, 05 May, 06:46
Karsten Bräckelmann     Re: The weirdest problem I have ever met Tue, 05 May, 13:52
Jodizzz       Re: The weirdest problem I have ever met Thu, 07 May, 03:26
Jodizzz         Re: The weirdest problem I have ever met Thu, 07 May, 09:33
Jonas Eckerman           Re: The weirdest problem I have ever met Thu, 07 May, 11:16
John Hardin           Re: The weirdest problem I have ever met Thu, 07 May, 15:51
Jodizzz             Re: The weirdest problem I have ever met Fri, 08 May, 02:28
John Hardin               Re: The weirdest problem I have ever met Fri, 08 May, 05:16
Jonas Eckerman                 Re: The weirdest problem I have ever met Fri, 08 May, 14:17
Re: Personal SPF
Matus UHLAR - fantomas   Re: Personal SPF Mon, 04 May, 11:19
Charles Gregory     Re: Personal SPF Mon, 04 May, 14:31
Matus UHLAR - fantomas       Re: Personal SPF Mon, 04 May, 15:17
Charles Gregory         Re: Personal SPF Mon, 04 May, 15:40
LuKreme           Re: Personal SPF Mon, 04 May, 21:37
Charles Gregory             Re: Personal SPF Tue, 05 May, 13:25
Matus UHLAR - fantomas               Re: Personal SPF Tue, 05 May, 14:07
Adam Katz                 Re: [SA] Personal SPF Tue, 05 May, 14:45
Matus UHLAR - fantomas                   Re: [SA] Personal SPF Tue, 05 May, 16:05
Jonas Eckerman       Re: Personal SPF Mon, 04 May, 19:08
Charles Gregory         Re: Personal SPF Mon, 04 May, 20:43
Matus UHLAR - fantomas           Re: Personal SPF Tue, 05 May, 06:55
Mike Cardwell             Re: Personal SPF Tue, 05 May, 08:33
Benny Pedersen               Re: Personal SPF Tue, 05 May, 13:25
Charles Gregory               Re: Personal SPF Tue, 05 May, 14:39
Matus UHLAR - fantomas                 Re: Personal SPF Tue, 05 May, 16:36
LuKreme                 Re: Personal SPF Tue, 05 May, 18:39
Mike Cardwell                   Re: Personal SPF Tue, 05 May, 19:41
Charles Gregory                   Re: Personal SPF Tue, 05 May, 20:43
Charles Gregory                   Re: Personal SPF Tue, 05 May, 20:48
Charles Gregory                     Re: Personal SPF Tue, 05 May, 20:53
Jonas Eckerman             Re: Personal SPF Tue, 05 May, 12:34
Charles Gregory               Re: Personal SPF Tue, 05 May, 14:48
Matus UHLAR - fantomas                 Re: Personal SPF Tue, 05 May, 15:53
Charles Gregory                   Re: Personal SPF Tue, 05 May, 16:44
Charles Gregory             Re: Personal SPF Tue, 05 May, 14:32
Matus UHLAR - fantomas               Re: Personal SPF Tue, 05 May, 16:35
Charles Gregory                 Re: Personal SPF Tue, 05 May, 20:33
Mark                   RE: Personal SPF Tue, 05 May, 21:39
Charles Gregory                     Re: [sa] RE: Personal SPF Wed, 06 May, 13:50
Mike Cardwell                       Re: [sa] RE: Personal SPF Wed, 06 May, 14:23
Charles Gregory                         Re: [sa] RE: Personal SPF Wed, 06 May, 15:30
LuKreme                       Re: Personal SPF Wed, 06 May, 21:13
Bill Landry                         Re: Personal SPF Wed, 06 May, 21:25
Jonas Eckerman               Re: Personal SPF Tue, 05 May, 21:25
John Hardin                 Re: Personal SPF Tue, 05 May, 23:06
J.D. Falk                   Re: Personal SPF Tue, 05 May, 23:36
Jonas Eckerman   Re: Personal SPF Tue, 05 May, 18:51
Charles Gregory Honeypot opportunity? Spammers treating tertiary DNS as MX Mon, 04 May, 18:53
Michael Scheidell   Re: Honeypot opportunity? Spammers treating tertiary DNS as MX Mon, 04 May, 21:23
Charles Gregory     Re: [sa] Re: Honeypot opportunity? Spammers treating tertiary DNS as MX Mon, 04 May, 21:47
mouss       Re: [sa] Re: Honeypot opportunity? Spammers treating tertiary DNS as MX Sat, 09 May, 12:44
Alexander Hoogerhuis     Re: Honeypot opportunity? Spammers treating tertiary DNS as MX Mon, 04 May, 21:51
Alejandro Cabrera Obed Error: "spamc: connection attempt to spamd aborted after 3 retries" Mon, 04 May, 18:57
Karsten Bräckelmann   Re: Error: "spamc: connection attempt to spamd aborted after 3 retries" Mon, 04 May, 19:10
Theo Van Dinter   Re: Error: "spamc: connection attempt to spamd aborted after 3 retries" Mon, 04 May, 19:53
Alejandro Cabrera Obed     Re: Error: "spamc: connection attempt to spamd aborted after 3 retries" Tue, 05 May, 15:17
Yet Another Ninja       Re: Error: "spamc: connection attempt to spamd aborted after 3 retries" Tue, 05 May, 15:29
Karsten Bräckelmann       Re: Error: "spamc: connection attempt to spamd aborted after 3 retries" Tue, 05 May, 15:39
Alejandro Cabrera Obed         Re: Error: "spamc: connection attempt to spamd aborted after 3 retries" Tue, 05 May, 16:10
Duane Hill           Re: Error: "spamc: connection attempt to spamd aborted after 3 retries" Tue, 05 May, 16:33
Karsten Bräckelmann           Re: Error: "spamc: connection attempt to spamd aborted after 3 retries" Tue, 05 May, 17:14
Alejandro Cabrera Obed             Re: Error: "spamc: connection attempt to spamd aborted after 3 retries" Tue, 05 May, 17:49
Theo Van Dinter               Re: Error: "spamc: connection attempt to spamd aborted after 3 retries" Tue, 05 May, 18:02
Jack Raats Errors during installation spamassasssin Tue, 05 May, 08:58
Theo Van Dinter   Re: Errors during installation spamassasssin Tue, 05 May, 17:52
John Thompson   Re: Errors during installation spamassasssin Tue, 05 May, 20:23
Mark     RE: Errors during installation spamassasssin Tue, 05 May, 22:33
Nicolas Letellier dcc reports Tue, 05 May, 10:51
Matt Kettler   Re: dcc reports Tue, 05 May, 11:57
Nicolas Letellier     Re: dcc reports Tue, 05 May, 12:42
"Adam Cécile (Le_Vert)" Flooded by a SPAM always containing the same picture Tue, 05 May, 12:16
Matus UHLAR - fantomas   Re: Flooded by a SPAM always containing the same picture Tue, 05 May, 12:44
RW     Re: Flooded by a SPAM always containing the same picture Tue, 05 May, 13:46
"Adam Cécile (Le_Vert)"       Re: Flooded by a SPAM always containing the same picture Tue, 05 May, 14:17
Randy         Re: Flooded by a SPAM always containing the same picture Tue, 05 May, 15:26
Martin Gregorie   Re: Flooded by a SPAM always containing the same picture Tue, 05 May, 12:49
Randy   Re: Flooded by a SPAM always containing the same picture Tue, 05 May, 13:23
Charles Gregory     Re: Flooded by a SPAM always containing the same picture Tue, 05 May, 14:36
Randy       Re: Flooded by a SPAM always containing the same picture Tue, 05 May, 15:14
Ned Slider         Re: Flooded by a SPAM always containing the same picture Wed, 06 May, 01:08
McDonald, Dan           RE: Flooded by a SPAM always containing the same picture Wed, 06 May, 01:13
Ned Slider             Re: Flooded by a SPAM always containing the same picture Wed, 06 May, 02:03
McDonald, Dan               RE: Flooded by a SPAM always containing the same picture Wed, 06 May, 02:31
LuKreme           Re: Flooded by a SPAM always containing the same picture Wed, 06 May, 01:45
Martin Gregorie           Re: Flooded by a SPAM always containing the same picture Wed, 06 May, 01:53
Ned Slider             Re: Flooded by a SPAM always containing the same picture Wed, 06 May, 02:52
Ned Slider               Re: Flooded by a SPAM always containing the same picture Fri, 08 May, 13:08
Randy                 Re: Flooded by a SPAM always containing the same picture Fri, 08 May, 13:27
Martin Gregorie                   Re: Flooded by a SPAM always containing the same picture Fri, 08 May, 14:06
Adam Katz           Re: Flooded by a SPAM always containing the same picture Wed, 06 May, 01:58
John Hardin   Re: Flooded by a SPAM always containing the same picture Tue, 05 May, 15:54
ermille1979 Spamassassin White_list problem Tue, 05 May, 13:59
Matus UHLAR - fantomas   Re: Spamassassin White_list problem Tue, 05 May, 14:11
Matt Kettler   Re: Spamassassin White_list problem Tue, 05 May, 23:42
ermille1979   Re: Spamassassin White_list problem Wed, 06 May, 07:21
Matt Kettler     Re: Spamassassin White_list problem Wed, 06 May, 10:43
ermille1979       Re: Spamassassin White_list problem Wed, 06 May, 11:13
John Hardin         Re: Spamassassin White_list problem Wed, 06 May, 14:55
vism...@email.it Rule to detect same address in sender and receiver Tue, 05 May, 14:30
Benny Pedersen   Re: Rule to detect same address in sender and receiver Tue, 05 May, 14:57
jida...@jidanni.org     Re: Rule to detect same address in sender and receiver Wed, 06 May, 19:59
Matus UHLAR - fantomas       Re: Rule to detect same address in sender and receiver Thu, 07 May, 12:11
Benny Pedersen         Re: Rule to detect same address in sender and receiver Fri, 08 May, 10:05
McDonald, Dan           Re: Rule to detect same address in sender and receiver Fri, 08 May, 12:47
Benny Pedersen             Re: Rule to detect same address in sender and receiver Sat, 09 May, 01:20
Karsten Bräckelmann               Re: Rule to detect same address in sender and receiver Sat, 09 May, 02:13
LuKreme               Re: Rule to detect same address in sender and receiver Thu, 21 May, 05:10
Benny Pedersen                 Re: Rule to detect same address in sender and receiver Thu, 21 May, 11:36
Benny Pedersen       Re: Rule to detect same address in sender and receiver Fri, 08 May, 09:48
Sean Leinart Blocking email with a valid internal destination address from outside. Tue, 05 May, 14:56
Benny Pedersen   Re: Blocking email with a valid internal destination address from outside. Tue, 05 May, 15:10
Sean Leinart     RE: Blocking email with a valid internal destination address from outside. Tue, 05 May, 15:14
John Hardin   Re: Blocking email with a valid internal destination address from outside. Tue, 05 May, 16:04
Sean Leinart     RE: Blocking email with a valid internal destination address from outside. Tue, 05 May, 16:09
mouss       Re: Blocking email with a valid internal destination address from outside. Tue, 05 May, 18:22
Lucio Chiappetti     Re: Blocking email with a valid internal destination address from outside. Wed, 06 May, 08:34
vibi whitelist problem :( Wed, 06 May, 07:15
Matt Kettler   Re: whitelist problem :( Wed, 06 May, 08:52
ermille1979   Re: whitelist problem :( Wed, 06 May, 09:50
vibi   Re: whitelist problem :( Wed, 06 May, 17:37
ɹןʇnqן sa-learn process overhwelming the server Wed, 06 May, 07:43
RW   Re: sa-learn process overhwelming the server Wed, 06 May, 12:13
LuKreme     Re: sa-learn process overhwelming the server Wed, 06 May, 20:23
Karsten Bräckelmann       Re: sa-learn process overhwelming the server Wed, 06 May, 21:01
Kevin Parris       Re: sa-learn process overhwelming the server Thu, 07 May, 14:53
John GALLET   Re: sa-learn process overhwelming the server Wed, 06 May, 12:35
Karsten Bräckelmann   Re: sa-learn process overhwelming the server Wed, 06 May, 12:50
LuKreme     Re: sa-learn process overhwelming the server Wed, 06 May, 23:34
Karsten Bräckelmann       Re: sa-learn process overhwelming the server Thu, 07 May, 01:46
LuKreme         Re: sa-learn process overhwelming the server Thu, 07 May, 01:55
Karsten Bräckelmann           Re: sa-learn process overhwelming the server Thu, 07 May, 02:37
Matus UHLAR - fantomas       Re: sa-learn process overhwelming the server Thu, 07 May, 12:02
Chris Santerre FW: ALL: SPAM-L will be shutdown Wed, 06 May, 16:17
Clayton Keller DOB Lookup Timeouts Wed, 06 May, 18:09
Raymond Dijkxhoorn   Re: DOB Lookup Timeouts Wed, 06 May, 18:11
Paul Houselander     RE: DOB Lookup Timeouts Wed, 06 May, 18:45
Adam Katz       Re: DOB Lookup Timeouts Wed, 06 May, 19:33
Karsten Bräckelmann         Re: DOB Lookup Timeouts Wed, 06 May, 20:01
Ken A     Re: DOB Lookup Timeouts Wed, 06 May, 19:42
Bazooka Joe Best way to invoke SA? Wed, 06 May, 18:26
Kris Deugau   Re: Best way to invoke SA? Wed, 06 May, 19:23
Adam Katz     Re: Best way to invoke SA? Wed, 06 May, 19:41
John Hardin       Re: Best way to invoke SA? Wed, 06 May, 19:47
mouss         Re: Best way to invoke SA? Fri, 08 May, 23:16
Dave Walker     Re: Best way to invoke SA? Wed, 06 May, 21:18
Simone Morandini Messages piling up in mquque.in Wed, 06 May, 22:45
John Hardin   Re: Messages piling up in mquque.in Wed, 06 May, 23:03
Arvid Ephraim Picciani custom scores not working Thu, 07 May, 12:05
Matt Kettler   Re: custom scores not working Thu, 07 May, 12:21
Arvid Ephraim Picciani     Re: custom scores not working Thu, 07 May, 12:33
LuKreme   Re: custom scores not working Thu, 07 May, 13:28
Karsten Bräckelmann     Re: custom scores not working Thu, 07 May, 13:40
Karsten Bräckelmann       Re: custom scores not working Fri, 08 May, 19:07
LuKreme         Re: custom scores not working Sat, 09 May, 16:20
Kris Deugau     Re: custom scores not working Thu, 07 May, 19:45
John Hardin Image-only spams Thu, 07 May, 16:20
Justin Mason   Re: Image-only spams Thu, 07 May, 18:46
Charles Gregory   Re: Image-only spams Thu, 07 May, 18:55
John Hardin     Re: Image-only spams Thu, 07 May, 19:04
Charles Gregory       Re: Image-only spams Thu, 07 May, 19:40
Bob Proulx       Re: Image-only spams Thu, 07 May, 21:04
Charles Gregory Odd behaviour under load. Thu, 07 May, 19:57
John Hardin   Re: Odd behaviour under load. Thu, 07 May, 20:15
SM     Re: Odd behaviour under load. Fri, 08 May, 05:57
Mark   RE: Odd behaviour under load. Fri, 08 May, 09:52
John Hardin     RE: Odd behaviour under load. Fri, 08 May, 13:50
SM       RE: Odd behaviour under load. Fri, 08 May, 16:23
Mark       RE: Odd behaviour under load. Fri, 08 May, 16:28
Charles Gregory         RE: Odd behaviour under load. Fri, 08 May, 19:00
mouss           Re: Odd behaviour under load. Sun, 10 May, 15:53
Charles Gregory       RE: Odd behaviour under load. Fri, 08 May, 18:50
John Hardin         RE: Odd behaviour under load. Fri, 08 May, 19:13
Charles Gregory           RE: Odd behaviour under load. Sat, 09 May, 04:41
Jonas Eckerman     Re: Odd behaviour under load. Fri, 08 May, 14:12
Charles Gregory     Re: [sa] RE: Odd behaviour under load. Fri, 08 May, 18:34
Michael Scheidell mcafee sees drop in spam? Fri, 08 May, 14:56
Jason Staudenmayer   RE: mcafee sees drop in spam? Fri, 08 May, 15:03
Marc Perkel     Re: mcafee sees drop in spam? Fri, 08 May, 17:51
Michael Scheidell   Re: mcafee sees drop in spam? Fri, 08 May, 15:07
Randy   Re: mcafee sees drop in spam? Fri, 08 May, 15:12
Peter P. Benac     RE: mcafee sees drop in spam? Fri, 08 May, 15:44
Chris Hoogendyk     Re: mcafee sees drop in spam? Fri, 08 May, 16:46
Jonas Eckerman       Re: mcafee sees drop in spam? Sat, 09 May, 00:09
LuKreme     Re: mcafee sees drop in spam? Sat, 09 May, 16:57
Martin Hepworth   Re: mcafee sees drop in spam? Fri, 08 May, 16:02
Randy     Re: mcafee sees drop in spam? Fri, 08 May, 16:36
Tim Connolly Turn on verbose logging in the headers Fri, 08 May, 20:16
Karsten Bräckelmann   Re: Turn on verbose logging in the headers Fri, 08 May, 20:54
fchan Stacked word sentences. Fri, 08 May, 22:04
John Hardin   Re: Stacked word sentences. Fri, 08 May, 22:50
John Hardin     Re: Stacked word sentences. Fri, 08 May, 23:03
Adam Katz     Re: [SA] Stacked word sentences. Fri, 08 May, 23:09
John Hardin       Re: [SA] Stacked word sentences. Fri, 08 May, 23:22
Karsten Bräckelmann       Re: [SA] Stacked word sentences. Fri, 08 May, 23:25
Message list1 · 2 · 3 · 4 · Next »Thread · Author · Date
Box list
Jul 201547
Jun 2015380
May 2015215
Apr 2015317
Mar 2015491
Feb 2015461
Jan 2015286
Dec 2014308
Nov 2014547
Oct 2014643
Sep 2014513
Aug 2014577
Jul 2014540
Jun 2014383
May 2014273
Apr 2014213
Mar 2014144
Feb 2014316
Jan 2014211
Dec 2013105
Nov 2013240
Oct 2013331
Sep 2013222
Aug 2013290
Jul 2013236
Jun 2013335
May 2013320
Apr 2013308
Mar 2013241
Feb 2013284
Jan 2013163
Dec 2012185
Nov 2012231
Oct 2012283
Sep 2012183
Aug 2012231
Jul 2012117
Jun 2012210
May 2012113
Apr 2012215
Mar 2012416
Feb 2012300
Jan 2012178
Dec 2011328
Nov 2011421
Oct 2011493
Sep 2011173
Aug 2011292
Jul 2011366
Jun 2011380
May 2011232
Apr 2011310
Mar 2011519
Feb 2011323
Jan 2011366
Dec 2010467
Nov 2010349
Oct 2010403
Sep 2010375
Aug 2010452
Jul 2010417
Jun 2010484
May 2010348
Apr 2010663
Mar 2010872
Feb 2010779
Jan 2010904
Dec 2009800
Nov 2009569
Oct 20091015
Sep 2009743
Aug 2009814
Jul 20091312
Jun 20091048
May 20091220
Apr 2009840
Mar 2009857
Feb 2009635
Jan 2009698
Dec 2008758
Nov 2008549
Oct 2008741
Sep 2008782
Aug 2008539
Jul 2008675
Jun 2008875
May 2008733
Apr 2008815
Mar 2008963
Feb 20081006
Jan 2008735
Dec 2007445
Nov 2007491
Oct 2007751
Sep 2007739
Aug 20071604
Jul 20071566
Jun 20071243
May 20071156
Apr 2007790
Mar 20071076
Feb 20071252
Jan 20071284
Dec 20061679
Nov 20062061
Oct 20062019
Sep 20061123
Aug 20062057
Jul 20061152
Jun 20061315
May 20061294
Apr 20061039
Mar 20061321
Feb 20061434
Jan 20061005
Dec 20051182
Nov 2005997
Oct 2005821
Sep 20051152
Aug 20051027
Jul 20051239
Jun 20051267
May 20051795
Apr 2005956
Mar 20051283
Feb 20051205
Jan 20051400
Dec 20041379
Nov 20041323
Oct 20041702
Sep 20041983
Aug 20041472
Jul 20041844
Jun 20042022
May 20041974
Apr 20042478
Mar 20042830
Feb 20042380
Jan 200426