spamassassin-users mailing list archives

Site index · List index
Message view « Date » · « Thread »
Top « Date » · « Thread »
From Matus UHLAR - fantomas <uh...@fantomas.sk>
Subject Re: [OT] Re: SpamAssassin is EXTREMLY slow
Date Wed, 08 Apr 2009 16:04:12 GMT
> On Wed, Apr 8, 2009 at 11:21 AM, Matus UHLAR - fantomas
> <uhlar@fantomas.sk> wrote:
> >> On Sat, Apr 4, 2009 at 5:48 AM, Matus UHLAR - fantomas
> >> <uhlar@fantomas.sk> wrote:
> >> >> On Wed, Apr 1, 2009 at 5:52 PM, John Hardin <jhardin@impsec.org>
wrote:
> >> >> > How fast are non-SA DNS queries on that box? If they take ten
seconds to
> >> >> > return an answer, SA is not the culprit.
> >> >
> >> > On 01.04.09 17:53, alexus wrote:
> >> >> without dns they are 0.1 - 1.5s, with DNS they are ~7s
> >> >
> >> > by "non-SA DNS" he did not mean SA without DNS, but DNS without SA... just
> >> > FYI.
> >
> > On 08.04.09 10:21, alexus wrote:
> >> what I meant is SA without this:
> >>
> >> v320.pre:loadplugin Mail::SpamAssassin::Plugin::DNSEval
> >
> > what HE (Josh Hardin) meant, is:
> >
> > dig www.microsoft.com.
> > dig 66.36.168.195.zen.spamhaus.org
> > dig mx surbl.org
> >
> > and look at the "Query time" result.

On 08.04.09 11:40, alexus wrote:
> root@mx1 ~ 503$ time dig www.microsoft.com.
> ;; Query time: 0 msec

> root@mx1 ~ 504$ time dig 66.36.168.195.zen.spamhaus.org
> ;; Query time: 288 msec

> root@mx1 ~ 505$ time dig mx surbl.org
> ;; Query time: 80 msec

seems good. But I think that your problem has been solved or am I wrong? 
At least you have learned what means "dns without spamassassin" :-)-- 
Matus UHLAR - fantomas, uhlar@fantomas.sk ; http://www.fantomas.sk/
Warning: I wish NOT to receive e-mail advertising to this address.
Varovanie: na tuto adresu chcem NEDOSTAVAT akukolvek reklamnu postu.
Fighting for peace is like fucking for virginity...

Mime
View raw message