spamassassin-users mailing list archives

Site index · List index
Message view « Date » · « Thread »
Top « Date » · « Thread »
From Raymond Dijkxhoorn <raym...@prolocation.net>
Subject Re: URIBL_BLACK
Date Fri, 10 Oct 2008 22:11:11 GMT
Hi!

>> I am very tempted to bump the score of it to 6.0 or higher, as it would
>> drastically reduce spam, but I'd like to get any false positive feedback
>> on doing that first.  I haven't seen any so far, but I figure others must
>> be doing this.

> meta URIBL_BLACK_ADJ (URIBL_BLACK)
> describe URIBL_BLACK_ADJ Meta: i trust uribl more :)
> score URIBL_BLACK_ADJ 1.5
>
> that way you still benefit from score adjust on sa-rules

Huh, why not simply:

score URIBL_BLACK 6

Inside your local.cf? This is wasting CPU... ?

Bye,
Raymond.

Mime
View raw message